He is a LUNATIC. Well. Like the time he held up that faked photo of Kilmar Abrego's hand, the time he told that idiot story of his uncle teaching the unabomber at MIT. He sits there and blatantly lies with no trouble at all. Comes naturally to him.

Can someone ask him to point to Portland on a map?

*
when the mad king is discovered

to have dementia

it will be historic.

His Fox News appointees Administration

and the Republican Party

will have a lot to answer for.

*

The 🟠🤡 is not well.
Whither his senility or insecurity makes him easy to manipulate by his "advisors", this unhinged rhetoric proves how unfit for office he really is!
#Resist
#ImpeachTrump
#ReleaseTheEpsteinFiles

Delusional! Can somebody in DC please put a giant TV up for the clown and show him videos of Portland.

Can I just call in a welfare check? Man he is gone. They are gonna milk his m until he is dead

Funny I was in Portland all last week and did a little too much (tax free) shopping. No plywood in sight.

Trump has that glazed look of a Grandpa whose family took away his car keys.

Jan. 6 Capitol riot: Law enforcement didn't share critical information, report says The Government Accountability Office director says it's important "to understand and diagnose what happened."

www.13newsnow.com/article/news...

Republican Political Party sponsored Jan 06 resulting in 5 deaths, over 100 police injured. Property damage estimated to be $2.7 billion, including expenses incurred by Capitol Police, District of Columbia, & federal agencies, & security upgrades. $5MIL to Ashli Babbit Family. Organized Terrorism.

Trump has always sunk his teeth in to something and created a dystopian fiction. From the Central Park 5 to Portland. But the dementia was on full display with PM Carney. Fool thinks he’ll be needed to sign a peace agreement after we helped kill over 18,000 Palestinian children.

1) How is it that the president's world is a constant feed of lies and nothing else?
2) How is it that the president falls for every lie?

Oh this is what you call a "total lie". He just lies all the time.

The Mad King’s lips are moving so that means he’s lying again.

This nutcase is totally over the edge. 25th Amendment time. Resistors can make a difference!

That and the gun deaths…his priorities are mixed up…

In Vatican meeting with El Pasoans, Pope Leo XIV offers support to migrants facing deportation - El Paso Matters During a Vatican meeting, Pope Leo XIV expressed solidarity with migrants after hearing firsthand accounts gathered by El Paso’s Hope Border Institute and La Mujer Obrera about the human toll of U.S. ...

"The Church cannot be silent."

"Pope Leo XIV’s eyes grew misty Wednesday as an El Paso delegation led by Bishop Mark Seitz presented him letters and a video that captured the fears and anxieties of people facing mass deportation in the United States..."

WTF??? First of all, Antifa as an organization, doesn't exist. Second of all, I'm assuming that that IF Antifa did exist, it would be made up of American members. So, is this Noem's way of admitting that they are arresting citizens of this country?

United States v. Luigi Nicholas Mangione, 25 Cr. 176 (MMG) Dear Judge Garnett: The Government writes pursuant to the Court's September 24, 2025 Order (Dkt. No. 53), and in response to the defendant's September 23, 2025 letter (Dkt. No. 52). This submission specifically addresses the defendant's contention that social media reposts attributed to two Department of Justice ("DOJ") personnel violate Local Criminal Rule 23.1. ' While the Government is cognizant of the Court's concerns flagged in the Court's Order, the Government respectfully submits that the statements identified in the September 23 letter do not violate the rule or the Court's Order because the statements were made by persons not associated with this matter.? Rule 23.1(a) applies to lawyers and others who are "associated with" a case: It is the duty of the lawyer or law firm, and of non-lawyer personnel employed by a lawyer's office or subject to a lawyer's supervision, private investigators acting under the supervision of a criminal defense lawyer, and government agents and police officers not to release or authorize the release of non-public information or opinion that a reasonable person would expect to be disseminated by means of public communication, in connection with pending or imminent criminal litigation with which they are associated, if there is a 1 The Government will address, in the Government's principal opposition due October 31, 2025 the defense's arguments regarding the statements made by White House officials. 2 As directed by the Court during the April 25, 2025 conference, and confirmed in the Government's letter of April 30, 2025, Dkt. No. 30, the Government previously communicated the Court's admonition regarding Local Rule 23.1 to the appropriate parties. (Tr. at 17:25-18:3.)

Page 2 substantial likelihood that the dissemination will interfere with a fair trial or otherwise prejudice the due administration of justice. Local Criminal Rule 23.1(a) (emphasis added). The defendant cites to social media posts made by two individuals employed by the DOf who do not appear to meet any of these criteria. These individuals are not members of the prosecution team, or trial counsel or statt supervised by the prosecution team, or otherwise employed by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York. Nor are they law enforcement agents working on this prosecution. They operate entirely outside the scope of the prosecution team, possess no operational role in the investigative or prosecutorial functions of the Mangione matter, and are not "associated" with this litigation within the meaning of Rule 23.1. See, e.g., Gentile v. State Bar of Nevada, 501 U.S. 1030, 1072-73 (1991) (making the "distinction between participants in the litigation and strangers to it" when examining a Nevada local court rule identical to ABA Model Rule of Professional Conduct 3.6 and substantially similar to Rule 23.1). Thus, the statements reposted by these individuals, who are not part of, and do not report to, the prosecution team, did not (and could not) violate Rule 23.1.3 Nonetheless, as reflected in the enclosed Declaration, upon becoming aware of the reposted statements, the Department promptly directed that the posts be removed. Furthermore, the DOJ personnel who made those posts have been informed of the Court's most recent admonitions regarding public statements by DOJ personnel. (See Declaration of Attorney for the United States 15). In a similar vein, and as further evidence to the DOJ's intention to control messaging by Department employees, on September 2, 2025 (prior to the instant motion or this Court's most recent Order), the Executive Office for United States Attorneys (EOUSA") also recently issued new review and approval processes for any pub…

Page 3 prejudice in use of deputy sheriffs, who were also witnesses in the case, as shepherds for the jury). Nor does the defense show the "substantial likelihood of material prejudice" required to regulate participant speech standard that, in any event, applies only to covered speakers, which these officials are not. Gentile 501 U.S. at 1072-73 (upholding restrictions on statements by attorneys representing clients in pending cases and making the "distinction between participants in the litigation and strangers to it."). While Rule 23.1(d)(7) treats opinions on guilt by covered persons as presumptively prejudicial, to establish a violation of the Rule, the defense must establish a concrete nexus between the challenged speech and the fairness of the trial. One relevant factor is the length of time between the challenged statement and the trial, Skilling, 561 U.S. at 383 (no presumed prejudice found because "over four years had elapsed between Enron's collapse and Skilling's trial," and the "decibel level of media attention diminished somewhat"), and, here, trial has not even been scheduled. To the extent the Court considers whether "reposting" constitutes the poster's own statement, at least one court in this district has determined that a reposting is "not necessarily an endorsement of the original tweet, much less an endorsement of the unexpressed belief system of the original tweeter," as a matter of law. Flynn v. Cable News Network, Inc., 621 F. Supp. 3d 432, 439 (S.D.N.Y. 2022). Even assuming the reposting (by individuals outside the prosecution team) of social media messages originally posted by individuals outside of the DOJ could fall under Rule 23.1, the Rule outlines measures that can be taken to address any potential prejudice with respect to the actual venire. See Rule 23.1(h). Sanctions or other extraordinary relief, particularly at this juncture, are simply not warranted. SEANS. BUCKLEY Attorney for the United States ting Under Authority Conferred U.S.…

This letter effectively acknowledges that two DOJ employees posted about the Mangione case. It concedes their posts were removed. It insists none of it matters because they weren’t “covered speakers.”

If that’s the new bar for impartiality, we’re in bigger trouble than we realized.

But the ethical one is different: Trump’s DOJ publicly posting about an active prosecution undermines the integrity of the process before it even starts.

The government cites Gentile v. State Bar of Nevada and Skilling v. U.S. to argue there’s no “substantial likelihood of prejudice” yet, since trial hasn’t begun.

That’s the legal threshold.

That’s the government’s argument…that Trump’s DOJ staff made public posts about an open federal case, but they technically don’t count because they aren’t on the trial team.

That interpretation of “association” should concern every defense attorney in America.

Filed today, the DOJ informed Judge Garnett that the social media posts cited by the defense do not violate Rule 23.1, which restricts public comment by anyone associated with an active criminal case.

Their reasoning: those DOJ employees “aren’t associated” with this prosecution.

What will it take for regular people to understand that if they refuse to stand up against fascism they will not be spared? Fascism is a serial killer with no restrictions on who it targets.

Before Epstein, who reportedly/allegedly was one of the world's most notorious blackmailers, 47 was best friends with Roy Cohn, also one of the world's most notorious blackmailers.

Off topic, I wonder how he decided which law firms and universities and media entities would settle lawsuits for $$.

There’s something magical about the way Sedona’s red rocks meet the cool, rushing water. The contrast of bold, earthy stone and the gentle movement of the creek made it the ideal place to rest, refuel, and soak in the beauty all around us.

‘Hiking Oak Creek’
Softpastel
#art #sedona #redrocks

I don't understand why I see things so differently. I see a health insurance industry that thinks it's entitled to charge people 1/3rd of their income for healthcare. That industry shouldn't be "fixed." It should be burned to the ground and its ashes pissed on.

Such a lovely surprise to have been nominated for the Health Educator Award at ISPID.

Amongst amazing, inspiring company making an incredible difference to families like ours.💙❤️

Ask yourself this before the next vote:
Is your House Representative pushing to release the Epstein files — or protecting the predators they hope you’ll forget?
🧵 ⬇️