Resharing in light of the upcoming First International Network of Trust meeting in Genoa. As ever, happy to add people and hope to see many of you soon!
go.bsky.app/CLK2iNM
@istudytrust.bsky.social
"truly enthusiastic trust nerd" (Möllering, 2023, p. 96)—assoc prof @ Mich State University—EIC @ Journal of Trust Research
Resharing in light of the upcoming First International Network of Trust meeting in Genoa. As ever, happy to add people and hope to see many of you soon!
go.bsky.app/CLK2iNM
#trustresearch
15.05.2025 02:24 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0#trustresearch
09.05.2025 17:51 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0My go-to networks person is Bill McEvily at U Toronto but this looks a little different from what I understand of that work. Cool stuff!
09.05.2025 17:05 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Hope you enjoy it!!
06.05.2025 02:51 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0📣 Are you a psychologist with an interest and passion for #ScienceCommunication research and/or practice in Germany? Join our newly founded DGPs interest group #PsyComm! 📣
28.04.2025 09:20 — 👍 17 🔁 12 💬 0 📌 0#trustresearch
22.04.2025 11:49 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I am hiring a new Lab Manager to help run the NYU Center for Conflict & Cooperation.
We start reviewing apps on MAY 1st and it pays over $58,000. Please share with anyone who might be interested!
Please apply here: apply.interfolio.com/166620
See more details below:
I have some quibbles with the idea that authorities can estimate public trust and some pieces of the experiment but I buy finding a correlation between government support for harm reduction and trust in government. Not sure if it would survive explicit conservative pushback though.
17.04.2025 10:59 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0More great #trustresearch!
10.04.2025 11:45 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0#trustresearch
07.04.2025 11:47 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Tyler told me to attend to treatment over outcome. Mayer introduced me vulnerability while Holling showed me balance. Ostrom asked me to trust the people, and Baldwin reminded me why we can’t always do that.
06.04.2025 15:02 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Lineage in academia is more than what school and who trained you. As a team sport, academic ideas necessarily come from somewhere.
My thought lineage is rooted heavily in Tyler and Mayer but also Holling, Ostrom, and Baldwin.
Unpacking them is a fun, intellectually reinvigorating mental break.
Thanks!
23.03.2025 02:13 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Big day :) #trustresearch
21.03.2025 23:37 — 👍 9 🔁 2 💬 1 📌 1How can we rebuild trust in psychology, law, and institutions? Join us for the Friday Plenary, where Drs. Fettig, Hamm, Perillo, and Neal will discuss the erosion of public confidence in government and legal systems and ways to restore faith in justice. #TrustInJustice #PsychologyAndLaw #apls2025
07.03.2025 17:30 — 👍 6 🔁 9 💬 1 📌 1I’ll be there!
19.02.2025 23:45 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Fun story on some recently published work coming out of the #TRUSSTLab.
sociology.msu.edu/news/student...
Instead of listing my publications, as the year draws to an end, I want to shine the spotlight on the commonplace assumption that productivity must always increase. Good research is disruptive and thinking time is central to high quality scholarship and necessary for disruptive research.
20.12.2024 11:18 — 👍 1156 🔁 376 💬 21 📌 57I was hoping more people would ask to be added :/
19.12.2024 03:53 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Job negotiation wishlist:
1) Please don't make me use Outlook
2) Please don't make me use Teams
Absolutely fair, but the paper draws attention to increases in trust in science on the left so my comment was aimed there.
(I neglected to include the title in my original post—very important context that I dropped…)
Hah! I thought that the article title would post. Important context for my musing here. :)
Rapidly diverging public trust in science in the United States.
It’s just my musing. They find the levels of trust diverge, in part, because liberal trust in science is increasing. It could be that science is more trustworthy, but I read it as a motivated response of reporting higher trust because it is under threat.
11.12.2024 01:32 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Interesting new piece on #trustinscience at PUS.
The authors argue that existing theory falls flat in explaining this and it left me wondering if this is—on average—an individual-level motivated trust/threat response for liberals as well as conservatives.
doi.org/10.1177/0963...
New #TrustResearch Paper Drop Day!
Schulz finds that, in response to the pandemic, pro-incumbent partisans are more motivated to offer their trust.
Subsequent declines trust however were equally explained by increased social (not individual) vulnerability across parties.
doi.org/10.1080/2151...
Right there with you 😂😩
10.12.2024 02:44 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0No, something happened recently. Not sure if it’s a bug or their new normal though…
09.12.2024 13:10 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0New TRUSST Lab Paper Drop Day
If trust is a willingness to accept vulnerability, it’s important to know what people feel vulnerable to. In multilevel institutions like #highred, we suggest that a place to start is capturing and cataloguing experienced harm.
#trustresearch
doi.org/10.1007/s107...
💯
06.12.2024 12:44 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0