Klemens Jo

1. Misogamy is dislike of or aversion to marriage.
2. You are being misogynistic in thinking women can't handle the typical banter of the Commons.

I can't find a good overview link but you can look up his work on birthmarks and also past-life memories among children (work carried on by his colleague Jim Tucker, following Stevenson's death).

That's what it sounds like: I don't want it and it can't stop me so it's okay.

Abortion is a woman not only announcing but enacting oppressive power on the most vulnerable and innocent. That is most certainly not a right.

It is a child. Yes I'm keen on human beings not being killed.

Might makes right

Morality is all about agreeing general rules for everyone's business.

Ian Stevenson has shown that consciousness survives the physical body. AI will become conscious like us only when our minds will be able to plug into it.

So do you think it's bad in all other circumstances? I'm glad that we agree.

By the way, a child cannot survive an ectopic pregnancy so there's no moral quandary there.

How did Western culture end up here, with the idea that it is a legitimate expression of freedom and the proof of equality for a woman to be able to kill her own child. A depraved and broken society, I'm afraid.

A foetus can only be said to be non-viable when it's been removed. Killing it in the womb can't prove its non-viability. C-sections and vaginal delivery are preferred because a) they're quicker b) less chance of infection c) the baby is given a chance. The mother likely hopes the child can survive.

The greater the use of contraception the greater the 'need' for abortion. This is quite obvious. A better society would be fighting to reduce abortions because no woman goes into a relationship wanting an abortion.

The names of abortion pills within a heart and stuck on the wall as something to be proud of...extraordinary. Love does not equal killing.

Not sure if true but one can only hope that this might one day happen and all human beings' lives can be protected and valued.

The right to life must be extended to all human beings across the United States and across the world. Only then can anyone truly say their lives have value.

outraging conservatives and killing the unborn.

Abortion/birth can likewise be seen as a metaphor for immigration and to what extent we welcome the weak and vulnerable even if it costs us something.

Healthcare is the opposite of abortion. You are so far on the wrong side of history you can't even see the dividing line with a Hubble telescope.

Why in the 21st century are we still doing these barbaric things? Our ignorance is only matched by our abuse of power.

Why? How about we don't kill human beings.

'Post-birth abortion' is where a child is either killed or allowed to die if born during a failed abortion. It's been documented to have happened and not just a couple of times. It is only because you are blind to the immorality of abortion that you can't conceive that sth like this can happen.

Given that exceptions for the mother's life exist do you agree that women are not being killed by abortion laws?

I guess therefore that the chart is wrong throughout.

As a test I looked up Mississippi's abortion law and they do allow for life-saving care for the mother and yet on your link it says there are "none stated" (exceptions). Same for Texas, whose law I have read. They have an exception but your chart says "none stated".

It's not necessarily relevant but there are trans-supporting bits in the Gospels, not that they're right either.

I choose to follow science and logic. That normally works well. There's no guarantee that one's conscious thoughts reflects the subconscious; the definition does not match your or general trans claims.

That definition doesn't work. You must come up with one that does.

You can't even define it. Look at how Dawkins grounds male and female in The Selfish Gene. BTW gender can't be defined divorced from sex.

I'm Norwegian. Those examples are in parts of those countries and most of them don't include trans in the gender binary as they fashion a third gender for instance.

Are you saying someone's self-ID might be wrong because they subconsciously identify otherwise?