@parkernfc.bsky.social
Passionate about stopping global warming & putting a spine back into Australian manufacturing. Ex President Aust. Nuclear Association & ANU Nuclear Masters Grad
We can do it right now with nuclear energy.
Its an essential tool to give us low cost energy+ultra low emissions.
This image shows the mix of wind, hydro, solar & nuclear.
France built 63GW in 22 years & now their emissions are < 30g CO2/kWh
We only need 25.3GW. Think of the environment we save
The utter hypocrisy of the Australian Government pushing to host COP31.
Our government campaigns against our lowest emitting form of energy while Turkey is building a fleet of new nuclear power plants.
We have the same anti-nuke policy as the German Climate Criminals
www.abc.net.au/news/2025-11...
Labor has never really cared about the environment or emissions reductions.
If they did the anti-nuclear legislation would be repealed and we would be building zero carbon nuclear power plants right now.
The total cost including the main project and all transmission could blow out to $25billion.
That's 13 times Malcolm Turnbull's announced cost of $2billion. The same guy who claimed there was no business case for nuclear energy.
youtu.be/gHl2vkwihvA
No Zali you campaign against effective action on climate change by avoiding nuclear energy
In this video we outline the impossibility of achieving deep decarbonisation without nuclear energy
It's a vital part of our energy transition from both an emissions & economic perspective
youtu.be/jWhhR_u8vhI
I cover:
-New nuclear plants in China
-Debacle on the Iberian Peninsular
-Costs of nuclear plants for Australia
-Nuke plants suited to Coalition Policy
-Costs & emissions of nuclear
-Stopping a Spanish style blackout
-Callous indifference of the ALP to low cost + low emissions
youtu.be/j94YjCEsnZk
Its an heroic assumption that EV charging will take place during the day.
Do you have evidence that this is the pattern in any other nation?
I want nuclear because:
a)It is the only proven way to get ultra low carbon energy
b)Its environmental footprint is minuscule compared to W&S
c)Its energy cost will be 1/2 that of excluding it - need 75% nuclear
d) It's an industrial rebirth for our nation
nuclearforclimate.com.au/nuclear-plan...
Except they don't + wind & solar aren't renewable
Here's just one example of the SA debacle that uses four different power sources intermittently to do one job.
This is why SA has the highest electricity prices & still circa 300 gCO2/kWh
W&S use 4 to 5 times more non RE resources than nuclear
In this video we outline the impossibility of achieving deep decarbonisation without nuclear energy.
It will be a vital part of our energy transition for both an emissions and economic perspective
youtu.be/jWhhR_u8vhI
The article says that wind & solar earn nothing during the day & this gets worse as their penetration increases. It then says they then need to rely on high prices from batteries at night
That's the same issue they criticise baseload for.
SA proves it doesn't work with our highest electricity prices
It seems you didn't read the article. It claims that because solar/wind have negative pricing, baseload can't compete - well neither can wind & solar. As W&S increase they eat each others lunch & go broke. Then back comes gas and a vicious cycle is set up.
Worst of all, W&S are not ultra low carbon
Please! Your phrasing is demonstrably false
The coalition policy on nuclear is our only way to achieve deep & long term CO2 reductions
This image shows that by 2120, nuclear will have halved the emissions of wind and solar = 3billion tonne CO2 saving
You know nuclear is vital & yet you oppose it?
In this video we outline the impossibility of achieving deep decarbonisation without nuclear energy.
It will be a vital part of our energy transition for both an emissions and economic perspective
youtu.be/jWhhR_u8vhI
#auspol #ClimateRisk #Energy #Climate #Nuclear
In this video we outline the impossibility of achieving deep decarbonisation without nuclear energy.
It will be a vital part of our energy transition for both an emissions and economic perspective
youtu.be/jWhhR_u8vhI
In this video we outline the impossibility of achieving deep decarbonisation without nuclear energy.
It will be a vital part of our energy transition for both an emissions and economic perspective
youtu.be/jWhhR_u8vhI
In this video we outline the impossibility of achieving deep decarbonisation without nuclear energy.
It will be a vital part of our energy transition for both an emissions and economic perspective
youtu.be/jWhhR_u8vhI
In this video we outline the impossibility of achieving deep decarbonisation without nuclear energy.
It will be a vital part of our energy transition for both an emissions and economic perspective
youtu.be/jWhhR_u8vhI
In this video we outline the impossibility of achieving deep decarbonisation without nuclear energy.
It will be a vital part of our energy transition for both an emissions and economic perspective
youtu.be/jWhhR_u8vhI
In this video we outline the impossibility of achieving deep decarbonisation without nuclear energy.
It will be a vital part of our energy transition for both an emissions and economic perspective
youtu.be/jWhhR_u8vhI
In this video we outline the impossibility of achieving deep decarbonisation without nuclear energy.
It will be a vital part of our energy transition for both an emissions and economic perspective
youtu.be/jWhhR_u8vhI
In this video we outline the impossibility of achieving deep decarbonisation without nuclear energy.
It will be a vital part of our energy transition for both an emissions and economic perspective
youtu.be/jWhhR_u8vhI
#auspol #ClimateRisk #Energy #Climate #Nuclear
Australia goes to the polls in a few weeks
We need to ensure we don't fall into an Energy Blunder
Nuclear is vital for a low cost ultra low carbon energy future Down under
youtu.be/roXLKlelJFA
#auspol #ClimateRisk
Australia goes to the polls in a few weeks
We need to ensure we don't fall into an Energy Blunder
Nuclear is vital for a low cost ultra low carbon energy future Down under
youtu.be/roXLKlelJFA
Data and analysis is provided on this page and others on our website
Please check it out and come back to me if you have questions
nuclearforclimate.com.au/nuclear-plan...
The CSIRO is totally politically compromised.
They certainly don't have any science behind their claims.
Further, we have no political or industry affiliation - unlike CSIRO who are the lackeys of their paymasters
Too much roof top PV & batteries is bad environmentally & cost wise
Analysis shows that a system with about 75% nuclear is 1/2 the cost of Step change & has 1/4 the emissions intensity
Nuclear is vital for our economy & is the ultimate climate protector
The policy will inflate battery costs
#auspol
Too much roof top PV & batteries is bad environmentally & cost wise
Our analysis shows that a system with about 75% nuclear is 1/2 the cost of Step change & has 1/4 the emissions intensity
Nuclear is vital for our economy & is the ultimate climate protector
Govt's policy will inflate battery costs
@sophiescamps.bsky.social
Sophie Scamps please support nuclear energy
Bowen is wrong about the costs in our system
Its not $600B -its only $198B by 2050
Total Nuclear+RE cost is half Step Change at $384B vs $846B
Nuclear stops fossil fuels & has 1/4 the emissions & France proves it works every day
@katechaneymp.bsky.social
Kate Chaney please support nuclear energy
Bowen is wrong about the costs in our system
Its not $600B -its only $198B by 2050
Total Nuclear+RE cost is half Step Change at $384B vs $846B
Nuclear stops fossil fuels & has 1/4 the emissions & France proves it works every day
