Tamara

I’ve donated eggs twice at different clinics both in NSW (one was Monash) and had very different experiences. The entire system is also vastly different state to state so I had to travel both times to donate as due to laws in my state (WA).

Alt text; a tweet from US senator Lindsay Graham reads; ‘Game On. pray For Israel’

Me, running to mum after I backhanded my unsuspecting brother for breathing weird.

Dorinda cox is at it again playing the victim

She is not. She is toxic and I’m just glad she’s albos issue now.

vt.tiktok.com/ZSk5Vj2WR/

Doing a series on ‘why we hate women’, my next candidate was a victim of police ‘over enthusiasm’ to close a case. The case has since been overturned. here’s my issue;

I don’t like the true crime genre. I want to avoid it becoming true crime & focus on the media’s role in the case

Is this doable?

🎶 Hell Yes, the the witch has left, which witch? 🎶

The one who was a horrendous bully and apparently labour are fine with that? She’s running cause she knew she wouldn’t get preselected with the greens. Why take her?!

Ding dong the witch is gone, ratata, hahaha!

vt.tiktok.com/ZSkYYSFFv/

AUSSIES; what’s an election issue you’ve seen in your area that has NOT gotten a lot of attention?

Eg, in WA, the live sheep export ban is going to be a big one, but I’ve not seen anyone talking about it.

Any others?

But that’s the point! It isn’t to help US, it’s to push housing prices up to protect the banks! They literally don’t want us to be able to afford housing, that would crash the speculative housing market.

First time I’ve found myself not cursing the out of touch econ bros with their own special boy version of astrology who run things.

It’s happening

WA Inc.arcerated, Part 1 | 2Girls1GarbageCan 2 Girls 1 Garbage Can · Episode

It’s not just the US of A that has a problem with money in politics

We wrote the playbook over this side of the pond on how to do corruption.

@2girls1garbagecan.bsky.social @mattymohawk.bsky.social

open.spotify.com/episode/2Fw7...

I dont think Angelica is the antagonist of the season…

I think she’s a red herring…

"Just another example of what the WA mining industry wants, the WA government gives – and (separately) what the WA government wants, the Federal government gives."

- Saul Eslake, Independent Economist #auspol

australiainstitute.org.au/post/triple-...

Everyone loved him and all he did was f us over. Sigh

The High court will receive a challenge as these companies can afford to challenge this legislation & the 2nd reading speech specifically stated YouTube would be excluded, which the court must consider under the purposive approach to stat interpretation.

THOUGHTS AND PRAYERS is what I’m sending these billionaires. I’m sure they’ll help 🙃

THOUGHT AND PRAYERS 🙃🙏

Click to Visit #ASafeChoice Network

If you see this post, can you please help spread this information?

#ASafeChoice is a referral network of physicians who provide medication abortion services ACROSS THE US.

People everywhere need to know about this option. These doctors have capacity to help more women!

Let’s spread word! ❤️✊

The Woolies injunction hearing happens tomorrow at 9:30am. In the event that they are successful, it will likely include an injunction that bars @UnitedWorkersOz from calling for a community picket to assemble.

Watch as a whole lot more republicans suddenly start care a whole lot more about gun control.

Things like the second reading speech form part of how legislation is interpreted by the court though, (the purposive approach to stat interpretation) so we can’t outright discount all of it. The second reading speech does specify allowances for exclusions and from memory YouTube was even mentioned

Hey all,

we use the purposive approach to statutory interpretation, which means the purpose of the legislation is considered by the court. This means things like the second reading speech and comments made therein form part of how the court interprets the law

So don’t discount those comments y’all

Evil potato finally getting what’s due to him

My kids school is already doing this at 7 and 8 years old, year 2 and 3! They learned about internet safety before they started typing lessons. There is no need for this nonsense

Abstinence only has never worked ever in the history of forever.

I think I just figured out what this social media ban is really about …

Media loyalty starts young, I was in high school when I started regularly reading the paper. Teens these days don’t need the paper…

Lachy thinks if he takes away TikTok they’ll start reading his shit stain excuse for a paper

When has abstinence only education worked. In our history prohibition has been shown to have reverb effects but oh well!

My kids school is already doing this; why assume it’s possible to keep kids off social media when it’s fair safer to prepare them for it?!

When has abstinence worked? Can anyone, ANYONE tell me?

Period

I guess I just don’t understand why you’re explaining something to me I wasn’t confused about and didn’t ask about.