Mathias Weis Damkjær 's Avatar

Mathias Weis Damkjær

@tweis.bsky.social

MD, PhD Student at Centre of Evidence-Based Medicine, Cochrane/Denmark Personal account. Does not reflect my employer

29 Followers  |  85 Following  |  2 Posts  |  Joined: 26.10.2024  |  1.6518

Latest posts by tweis.bsky.social on Bluesky

Post image

❓ In people with HIV, is using two different rapid tests together ('parallel testing') to diagnose TB more accurate than using only one?

An 'incremental' accuracy question: few Cochrane Reviews have yet addressed such questions.

Adult review: shorturl.at/r9CUG
Child review: shorturl.at/nSosK

13.06.2025 09:27 — 👍 2    🔁 2    💬 0    📌 0
Preview
2025 - ESMARConf

The Evidence Synthesis and Meta-Analysis in R Conference (ESMARConf) is back! It will be held June 11th to the 13th, 2025: esmarconf.org/2025/

Recordings of the talks and workshops from previous years can be found here: esmarconf.org/recordings/

#ESMARConf #MetaAnalysis #EvidenceSynthesis #RStats

06.03.2025 08:45 — 👍 15    🔁 9    💬 0    📌 0
Preview
Should one derive risk difference from the odds ratio? I urge all readers of this thread to read the excellent new preprint from philosopher of science Veli-Pekka Parkkinen, “Choice of effect measure, extrapolation, and decision-making in patient care an...

After two years of trying to avoid this discussion, I just necroed *that thread* on datamethods (discourse.datamethods.org/t/should-one...) in order to share an excellent preprint by philosopher Veli-Pekka Parkkinen (philsci-archive.pitt.edu/24785/1/efme...)

26.02.2025 10:00 — 👍 8    🔁 3    💬 1    📌 0
Preview
A conversation on treatment effects The trial statistician and the clinical investigator took a step back to admire their creation.

Two angels discussing the basics of treatment effects.

(ICYMI)

statsepi.substack.com/p/a-conversa...

09.01.2025 08:15 — 👍 29    🔁 9    💬 1    📌 0

Thanks for making this freely available. It is a great book.

23.12.2024 13:41 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0
Preview
Giant study finds untrustworthy trials pollute gold-standard medical reviews Two-year collaboration aims to create tools to help counter the tide of flawed research.

Nice write up of our study applying potential trustworthiness checks to RCTs in 50 Cochrane Reviews in Nature by @richvn.bsky.social : www.nature.com/articles/d41...

19.12.2024 09:34 — 👍 62    🔁 29    💬 3    📌 4

Nice and important work!

19.12.2024 13:41 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

@tweis is following 20 prominent accounts