Also note that I didn't say one disparaging thing about trans people, LGBTQ in general or you at all.
08.10.2025 02:38 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0@warrocketajaxjr.bsky.social
USMC0311 veteran | GenX | Independent= not Dem/GOP | ANTImfkn-maga-fascist | Comic Book Junkie | Film/TV School Dropout | Comedy Nerd | SciFi Horror Fantasy Fanatic | Foodie | Bi-petual = I love cats AND dogs | Veterans Rights Advocate
Also note that I didn't say one disparaging thing about trans people, LGBTQ in general or you at all.
08.10.2025 02:38 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Now see, that's more like it!
Was it really so hard to provide some quotes/statements to back up your points as opposed to aimlessly ranting?
Providing facts and nuance in a debate lends a lot more (if any at all) credibility to your thoughts and opinions as well as info for others to comprehend.
He also signed this one into law: California SB729: State Sen. Caroline Menjivar, D-San Fernando Valley, called the new law a victory for Californians who were denied coverage because theyโre part of the LGBTQ+ community or their relationship status.
legiscan.com/CA/text/SB72...
AB 2442
legiscan.com/CA/text/AB24...
Put up some [facts] to back up your claims, otherwise you're just pissing against the wind.
leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTe...
He only vetoed TWO other trans gender bills: one that would lead to increased licensing fees that would be passed onto trans people seeking care and another that could have could be used by "other-minded elected officials" to harm vulnerable communities in the future.
08.10.2025 02:12 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0I'd rather get behind something that I get the FACTS on rather than whatever fits my bias', otherwise, if I don't know what I'm talking about then I've always found it wise to keep my mouth shut until I do.
08.10.2025 01:55 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Look mthafka, read the goddamn bill.
The only reason he vetoed it was because there's research being conducted and he wants to postpone voting on it until all the data is in but nah...it's just easier to fly off the handle and be a dick just because someone said something that fits your narrative
You're just another one who's blindly playing right along with trump's playbook as he plays ya'll into viewing them as mindless stormtroopers.
He's directing some of ya'll like a circus ringleader does dancing monkeys in the circus.
Okay, he's not "the guy" for you but he IS "the guy" for others.
See?
It's a "win-win" for everyone.
I know it's a joke but I honestly think that they will either have to bury him someplace secret or assign guards to keep away from pissing/shting on his grave.
08.10.2025 01:01 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Looking forward to seeing that.
07.10.2025 22:54 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0That is a great fucking name/handle.
07.10.2025 22:53 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Cool, hit me up when they throw their hat in the ring.
07.10.2025 22:51 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Sheโs lying (shocker). Itโs a โsee something, say somethingโ app that only shows in real time where ICE currently is based on input via witnesses on the ground. ICE would actually have to provide their home addresses themselves for what she said to be true.
07.10.2025 22:50 โ ๐ 5 ๐ 2 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0So basically he's saying to wait until all the info from the study is complete before voting on it.
07.10.2025 22:32 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Here's the bill; his veto only postponed it until later;
"In a signing message, Newsom said he was vetoing the legislation because he thought the bill should be considered AFTER a state study scrutinizing health curricula was completed"
leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNa...
Yeh, I don't place much stock in idle internet speculation/trolling so I'll trust you won't mind if I take a wait and see attitude.
07.10.2025 22:20 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0But apparently Philly thought Fetterman the better candidate at the time, hence his win so it is relevant that the only choices they had were him or Oz.
And again; until someone else better comes along then I don't think "cutting off one's nose to spite one's face" does any good either.
Oz is who Fetterman beat, yaโll saying that was a mistake = Oz as your alternative.
07.10.2025 21:32 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Depends on who heโs running against. He currently leads double digits in the polls pitting him against Trump and Vance.
07.10.2025 21:31 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Is Fetterman running again?
07.10.2025 21:29 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Iโll let the primary decide but for now heโs the only one fighting like I wish more of them would.
07.10.2025 21:28 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0I guess weโll see.
07.10.2025 21:26 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0For better or worse, I think the upcoming prop 50 vote should give a pretty good indication of where we (Californians) stand regarding Newsom.
07.10.2025 21:26 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0So you think they should have voted for Dr. Oz instead?
07.10.2025 21:23 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Iโm an actual Californian.
Next monthโs vote on Newsomโs Prop 50 should give a pretty good idea of where we stand.
Yeh, because Iโm sure Dr. Oz would have been a much better choiceโฆ
07.10.2025 21:21 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Where is that reported?
07.10.2025 21:19 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0