CheeseheadTV's Avatar

CheeseheadTV

@cheeseheadtv.bsky.social

Devoted to Green Bay Packers fans, worldwide.

7,341 Followers  |  15 Following  |  2,452 Posts  |  Joined: 09.01.2024  |  2.3252

Latest posts by cheeseheadtv.bsky.social on Bluesky

Preview
Cory's Corner: Get Back To The Details The NFL season is now a wrap. The regular season and playoffs were very entertaining. Matthew Stafford won the MVP after passing for 46 touchdowns and eight picks and four of the top five NFL receivers were also in the NFC.  So where do the Packers go from here?  According to DraftKings Sportsbook the Packers are tied for seventh to get to Super Bowl LXI. That means they are behind the Seahawks, Rams and Eagles in the NFC.  That should give you a clue as to how many games the Packers threw away last year. They had a 9-7-1 record and barely snuck into the back door of the playoffs by losing the last four games of the regular season.  Also, let’s not forget about the 13-10 loss to Cleveland, 40-40 tie to Dallas, 16-13 loss to Carolina and 10-7 loss to Philly.  The microcosm of a lack of detail is the 2025 Packers. Presnap penalties, poor clock management, bad quarterback decision making and a lack of defensive communication. It came in waves for the Packers this year.  And yet, the Packers still succeeded. Seventy-seven percent of Josh Jacobs’ yards came after contact. He averaged three yards after contact and had 13 rushing touchdowns. Tucker Kraft was arguably the best tight end for half the season until he tore his ACL.  There is also Micah Parsons, probably the No. 2 defensive game wrecker in the NFL behind Myles Garrett. He was getting doubled, chipped and held on many occasions. Yet, he still led the team with 12.5 sacks. Rashan Gary took second with 7.5 sacks, but this team is desperate to find another guy to pressure the quarterback and it also needs more depth on the defensive line. But most of all, this team just needs to focus on the details. The small stuff. The Patriots made it to the Super Bowl because coach Mike Vrabel turned around a team that went 4-13 the year before. Did they have a soft schedule? Sure. But they went 14-3 in 2025 because they didn’t make a habit of giving away games.  It’s that simple. The Packers are close. Granted, the secondary needs some tender loving care, but they could compete with any NFC team right now besides Seattle. The Seahawks are solid in all three phases. But again, it comes back to the details.    Filed Under: Packers NewsFeaturedGreen Bay PackersCory JennerjohnCory's Corner   PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE. __________________________ Cory Jennerjohn is a graduate from UW-Oshkosh and has been in sports media for over 15 years. He was a co-host on "Clubhouse Live" and has also done various radio and TV work as well. He has written for newspapers, magazines and websites. He currently is a columnist for CHTV and also does various podcasts. He recently earned his Masters degree from the University of Iowa. He can be found on Twitter: @Coryjennerjohn __________________________ NFL Categories: Green Bay PackersTags: Green Bay PackersJordan LoveMicah ParsonsJosh Jacobs Like 0 points
10.02.2026 12:48 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0
Pack-A-Day Podcast - Episode 2756 - Time for the Packers to Upgrade at CB!!! On today's show, Andy & Justis talk Super Bowl, cornerback options, Romeo Doubs, and much, much more. Don't miss it!!!     Filed Under: Pack A Day Podcast   PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE. __________________________ Andy is a graduate of UW-Oshkosh and owns & operates the Pack-A-Day Podcast. Andy has taken multiple courses in NFL scouting and is an Editor for Packer Report. Andy grew up in Green Bay and is a lifelong season ticket holder - follow him on Twitter @AndyHermanNFL! __________________________ NFL Categories: Green Bay PackersTags: Pack-A-Day PodcastPackers podcastPacker PodcastGreen Bay Packers podcastgreen bay packer Like 0 points
10.02.2026 10:51 — 👍 3    🔁 1    💬 0    📌 0
Preview
Packers Must Address Defensive Tackle Early in 2026 NFL Draft When it comes to the NFL Draft, the Packers are not slaves to their immediate needs, often preferring to look ahead to what their needs could be down the road, and viewing their draft picks as long term investments rather than a method of plugging roster holes. It is for that reason that Brian Gutekunst must draft a defensive tackle early in the upcoming draft. The Packers are already not in a strong position on the defensive interior heading into 2026, with Devonte Wyatt far and away their most reliable presence, and a group of inconsistent players behind him, headlined by Karl Brooks, Colby Wooden, Warren Brinson and Nazir Stackhouse. Wooden, Brooks and Brinson, all former day three draft picks, ranked 92nd, 107th and 111th out of 127 qualified defensive tackles at PFF in 2025, and Wyatt actually only ranked 87th, down from 37th the previous year. But the immediate lack of quality in the room is not the reason the Packers need to make an addition in the draft. As has often been the case when Green Bay enters the offseason with a glaring issue, Gutekunst first turns to free agency to address it and hopefully secure an instant solution. Generally, the Packers like to enter the draft not ‘needing’ anything. In fairness to Gutekunst, he would not have known when constructing last year’s roster that he would end up trading Kenny Clark on the eve of the season. At that time, there was no one available to pick up as a free agent who was going to make any kind of tangible difference, so Green Bay understandably rolled with what they had, and expected Micah Parsons to make the front better overall, which he did. Expect Gutekunst to in essence replace Clark in the upcoming free agency period. The real problem is when you look beyond 2026, and this is where the draft comes in. None of Wyatt, Brooks or Wooden are slated to be on the team after next season. The cupboard is absolutely bare when it comes to long term investments on the defensive interior. That should not be all that surprising when analyzing Green Bay’s drafts during Gutekunst’s tenure. Since taking over as general manager in 2018, he has made 29 picks in the first three rounds of the draft. Only one of them has been a defensive tackle (Wyatt in round one back in 2022). It is not exactly shocking that it has become one of the thinnest spots on the team. Something resembling a premium investment at the position was overdue last year, but the Packers were boxed out of any defensive tackles worth drafting in the first two days, as to a man, pretty much every single one was drafted earlier than most people expected. That is a fair enough excuse for why it was not addressed sooner, but the Packers desperately need to add some building blocks for the next few seasons, and they cannot afford to exit this year’s draft, which is another strong one for defensive tackles, without one. A nose tackle in particular could be of use, as Green Bay did not really have one without TJ Slaton this year. Even with their first pick not coming until 52 overall, they should still be in range to nab a Domonique Orange, Dontay Corleone or Darrell Jackson Jr. For all the talk about cornerback and the offensive line, defensive tackle is Green Bay’s most glaring long term need, and barring another unforeseen case of the board not falling the right way, one of their day two picks in the 2026 NFL Draft needs to be reserved for that position. Filed Under: NFL DraftFeaturedGreen Bay PackersMark Oldacres   PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE. __________________________ Mark Oldacres is a sports writer from Birmingham, England and a Green Bay Packers fan. You can follow him on twitter at @MarkOldacres __________________________ NFL Categories: Green Bay PackersTags: Packers newspackers draft 2026Packers rosterdevonte wyattColby Wooden Like 0 points
09.02.2026 23:54 — 👍 7    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0
Preview
Packers Daily: Super Bowl LX Didn't Teach Us Anything We Didn't Already Know Listen to the podcast here: Find all of my daily podcasts here. Filed Under: Featured#PackersDailyPacker Fan Podcasts   PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE. __________________________ Tags: Green Bay PackersSuper Bowl LX Like 0 points
09.02.2026 22:54 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0
Preview
Get to Know Green Bay's Newest Assistant: Noah Pauley Noah Pauley will be joining the Packers as Green Bay’s new wide receivers coach. Head coach Matt LaFleur and the Packers have already experienced many changes to the coaching staff this offseason, but Pauley is the first addition to the offensive side of the ball. Jordan Schultz initially reported last Thursday that the Packers were parting ways with former wide receivers coach Ryan Mahaffey and hiring the 36-year-old Pauley. It's unclear how it all transpired, but it's possible that Mahaffey’s exit could have been a mutual parting of ways, as he is reportedly joining Sean Mannion in Philadelphia as the Eagles’ new run game coordinator and tight ends coach.  Pauley has been described as a "rising star" in the coaching ranks. He's said to have a bright and gifted offensive mind. Unlike Mahaffey, Pauley brings plenty of wide receiver experience to Green Bay. Pauley was a four-year starter at wide receiver for the University of Minnesota-Duluth and has coached the position for nearly ten years. His experience and coaching skill set make this a very encouraging hire for Matt LaFleur, despite a lack of NFL experience.  The #Packers are parting ways with WRs coach Ryan Mahaffey and plan to hire Penn State WRs coach Noah Pauley as his replacement, per sources. Pauley spent the past three years as Matt Campbell’s WRs coach at Iowa State, working with Jayden Higgins, Jaylin Noel, and others, then… pic.twitter.com/PR2agaWKpQ — Jordan Schultz (@Schultz_Report) February 5, 2026 From Duluth to Green Bay Noah Pauley is a Midwesterner through and through. He grew up in Duluth, Minnesota, and then went on to play wide receiver for his hometown school. After his playing career, Pauley joined the University of Minnesota-Duluth staff as a student assistant. He then worked as a graduate assistant for two seasons before becoming the school's offensive coordinator and wide receiver coach, a role he held for three seasons. After five years at UMD, Pauley was hired to be the wide receivers coach at North Dakota State (NDSU). During Pauley’s tenure with the Bison, he helped the team win two FCS championships and two Missouri Valley Conference championships. He also coached current Green Bay Packers wide receiver Christian Watson for multiple seasons, helping Watson become an FCS All-American and three-time all-conference selection. Pauley spent the summer of 2022 working with the Packers as part of the NFL's Bill Walsh Diversity Coaching Fellowship. Pauley most recently served as the pass game coordinator and wide receiver coach at Iowa State University. He was hired in 2023 to coach wide receivers, but added the role of pass game coordinator in 2024. During Pauley’s time with the Cyclones, he helped develop NFL draft picks Jayden Higgins (second round) and Jaylin Noel (third round). Pauley was hired as the wide receivers coach at Penn State after the 2025 season, following head coach Matt Campbell. Pauley only spent a couple of months with the Nittany Lions before making his jump to the NFL with the Packers. Reunited and It Feels So Good The Packers might not have consulted with wide receiver Christian Watson when hiring Noah Pauley, but the addition has Watson's seal of approval. The two were together at North Dakota State from 2019 to 2021. "That's my dawg. I love Coach Pauley," Watson said last week. "Obviously, I'm super excited for the opportunity for him. I'm ready to work with him again." Watson was lightly recruited out of high school, but Pauley helped develop him into a second-round draft pick. "He was definitely one of the coaches who, throughout my lifetime, I'm most grateful for," Watson shared. "He definitely helped me grow as a player and as a man. I'm excited to get to work. I know he's going to get us right in the wide receiver room." Watson led the Bison in receiving for three straight seasons with Pauley as his position coach, including a career-best in receptions (43), yards (801), and touchdowns (7) in 2021. With Watson headed into another contract year, the reunion with Pauley was more than welcome. "I'm super excited. He was a great coach for me. He was probably one of my favorite coaches I've had, if not the favorite," said Watson. "I think he's going to bring a different dynamic to the offense, a different mindset. I know he's going to be dialed in. He's gonna get us right at WR... We'll have a special group next year." Watson's father also gave a glowing review of Pauley. It's safe to say the Watson family is excited for this reunion.  -Young and relatable -Tactical Teacher -Extremely Intelligent -Resolute -Demanding but fair -Players play HARD for him https://t.co/FaZILHb09j — Tazim Wajid Wajed (@NFLHitman33) February 5, 2026 What Pauley Brings to Green Bay Noah Pauley's arrival in Green Bay marks a full-circle moment for the young coach after growing up as a Packers fan. Now the Packers are adding someone who is described as a young, up-and-coming coaching star. Penn State fans were ecstatic when they heard he was joining the Nittany Lions' staff; they were devastated when they heard he was leaving. Instead of rebuilding a wide receiver room in Happy Valley, Pauley will be tasked with helping a young but experienced wide receiver group take the next step in Green Bay. Jaylin Noel, a 2025 third-round draft pick, spoke glowingly of his former position coach. “He’s a connector of people,” Noel said via PennLive. “He knows how to communicate with guys. He’s a competitor as a coach and always wants to see a competitive edge from his players. And my favorite part about his coaching style is the freedom he gives a receiver to grow. He gives you the base fundamentals. And from there, he wants to see you grow into your own player.” Pauley comes to Green Bay with plenty of experience coaching wide receivers, something they haven't had in a while. Neither of Green Bay's last two wide receiver coaches (Ryan Mahaffey and Jason Vrable) had backgrounds or experience coaching the position. Between playing and coaching, almost all of Pauley's experience is with wide receivers, and he's helped develop some good ones. “From the day he stepped in and watched film with me and talked over my game, there were so many tips he gave me," Noel also shared. "It started off with the simple things like footwork at the line of scrimmage, being able to have a multitude of releases, things like that. His football IQ, having played the position, and how smart he is, elevated how I watched film and studied." "He’s a special coach. He’s going to shoot you straight," Noel added. "I appreciated his honesty because that elevates you as a player. He’s going to tell it like it is. And he’s not going to give you any bulls---." Filed Under: Packers NewsFeaturedGreen Bay PackersCarter Semb PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE. __________________________ Carter Semb is a lifelong Packer fan, shareholder, and season ticket holder. He is a contributor for Cheesehead TV and Packers Talk. For commentary surrounding Wisconsin sports, he can be found on X at @cmsemb. __________________________ NFL Categories: Green Bay PackersTags: Matt LaFleurNoah PauleyGreen Bay PackersChristian Watson Like 0 points
09.02.2026 20:45 — 👍 9    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0
Preview
Mock Draft Monday: Trade Up for a CB… or Stockpile Picks? Packers Draft Debate Filed Under: NFL DraftNewt WestenPacker Fan Podcasts   PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE. __________________________ Newt Westen is the Founder of 0-Tech Draft, contributor for The Draft Professor and Lead NFL Draft Analyst for CheeseheadTV.com. He's a lifetime Packers fan and you can follow Newt at @NFLDraft_Westen on X. __________________________ Tags: Green Bay PackersNFL Draft Like 0 points
09.02.2026 14:04 — 👍 6    🔁 1    💬 0    📌 0
Preview
Jonathan Gannon Has A Shot At His Own Personal Redemption Arc. While the Packers are in the middle of a massive coaching changeover, there is still time to stop and ponder the new man at the top of the defense.  We all know the story: Johnathan Gannon takes over as defensive coordinator for the newly departed Jeff Hafley. He brings with him a wealth of experience at defensive coordinator. He’s been able to put together an impressive string of coaching staff changes as well. I look forward to his introductory press conference in Green Bay, for a better idea of the man and the mindset he brings with him to the Packers. There is something bubbling just below the surface, whether he acknowledges it or not.  While he is in Green Bay, Gannon has a shot at his own personal redemption arc. And it might be his last.  Let’s be clear: the Packers did take a risk in bringing Gannon in. Green Bay is betting that Gannon’s experience will ensure a clean transition from one system to another, while in an extremely crucial year of a championship window. Typically, those kinds of scheme changes can take up to a year to really sink into the roster and become effective. The Packers don’t have that kind of time. In his first season with Green Bay, Gannon must: circumnavigate the lack of firepower at CB and maximize the talents of Micah Parsons while cleaning up the defensive line around him, all while effectively installing his own system.  The Packers’ confidence in his ability to do this is why Gannon is in this position. Surely he demonstrated his plan for all that to the Packers during the interview process. If he can pull it off, Gannon might earn himself a shot to prove that the disastrous tenure in Arizona was just a pit stop.  It was only three years ago that Gannon stood on the sidelines of Super Bowl LVII, as the Eagles held a 24-14 lead at halftime. His unit had effectively stymied Patrick Mahomes and the vaunted Chiefs offense to a pair of touchdowns. But it all fell apart from there. Gannon’s defense allowed 24 unanswered points to the Chiefs, and became only the second team in Super Bowl history to blow a double digit halftime lead.  Gannon was introduced as the head coach of the Arizona Cardinals mere days later, a move which raised more than a few eyebrows around the league. It was later revealed that the Cardinals had interviewed Gannon during the no-contact week leading up to the Super Bowl. Arizona was fined draft picks for the move, but more importantly, it cast shade over Gannon’s entire tenure with the Eagles. Had he been too distracted by the Arizona interview to effectively prepare for the Chiefs that year? Ask any Eagles fan about Gannon now, and you’ll hear a lot of blame being laid at his feet for that loss.  Now, I don't know to what extent all of that is true. But what we do have is one of Gannon’s teams being disappointed with the ultimate result of his tenure. Maybe that’s unfair to his total body of work. While Gannon was the DC of the Eagles in 2022, that defense was dominant. Second in total yards allowed, eighth in points allowed, and first in pass defense. Seventy sacks during the regular season, which was third most in NFL history at that point. Four different players with over ten sacks. It goes on.  He had elite talent on that roster, sure. But he also gets credit for developing and maximizing that talent. Players like Darius Slay, Hasson Reddick, Brandon Graham and Josh Sweat had career years under Gannon. Players play, but coaches coach. Gannon’s resume in Philadelphia was more than enough to earn him a head coaching gig.  It just… did not go well. While as head coach in Arizona, Gannon’s Cardinals finished with a 15-36 record, a .294 percentage that lands him as the 200th of 207 coaches with over 50 games under their belt. In 2025, they suffered what might be their worst season in the modern era. A 3-14 finish, 0-6 against their own division, and a franchise record, nine game losing streak. In fact, they lost fourteen of their last fifteen games. Gannon was fined $100,000 for taking a swing at his own player on the sidelines during a disastrous loss to the Tennessee Titans. Gannon’s previously celebrated defense was 30th in several major categories: points allowed, yards allowed, sacks, and completion percentage. To be fair, this was while delegating play calling responsibilities to his own defensive coordinator Nick Rallis. More importantly, the Cardinals were one of the only teams this year that were hit harder by injuries than the Packers. By the end of the season, Arizona had 25 players listed on their season ending IR. Not to mention being handcuffed by his quarterback situation.  Despite all that, Gannon was hired by the Packers mere weeks after being fired. So where does Gannon stand now? Is he the man who coached a #2 defense that reached the Super Bowl? Or is he the coach who just came off a 3-14 record, fought his own player, and lost the locker room?  The answer is probably both. There are plenty of coaches who are really good at being a coordinator. Look at Josh McDaniels, who just coached an offense that reached the Super Bowl, despite failing massively at two separate head coaching stints. There’s Vic Fangio, Steve Spagnola, and countless others. Being a head coach is an entirely new skill set. While in Arizona, Gannon had to delegate play calling and struggled with game management and leading the locker room.  But now that he’s back on the headset, calling plays and leading his own side of things? He’s got the receipts to prove he can get it done. Not only in Philly, but his rich history with franchises such as Indianapolis, Minnesota, Tennessee, and Atlanta. The Packers are betting that he can revert to this version of himself, and provide a top ten defense for the Packers championship run next season.  If he can’t, it might not be hyperbole to say this would be his last shot. Coaches rarely get a third chance in the NFL, and despite only being 44 years old, the reputation might hold him back for the rest of his time in the NFL.  But if Gannon can complete his redemption arc? If he can deliver on the defense’s potential, he can prove that his shortcomings were rooted in roster deficiencies rather than personal. He’ll assuredly get another shot at being a head coach in the process too.  Personally, I’ll admit that Gannon was not among my first choices for the job. But the more I’ve researched the pairing, the more I like it. I like how his scheme fits with our roster, and I think he’s got a great shot to revitalize some shortcomings on the roster, particularly in the secondary.  And now, I love that Gannon has personal stakes in the game. As fans, we love when players have a chip on their shoulder, and something to prove to their doubters. Now, we’ve got a coach that fits that mold too. Gannon has personal stakes in Green Bay’s success that lie beyond a performance bonus or contract extension. I hope we get this version of Gannon instead of this one.  He’ll be instrumental to whatever outcome the Packers get out of the 2026 season. I can only hope that in a year from now, we can look back on this hire as the difference in what was a championship run for the Packers.    Filed Under: FeaturedKalani Jones PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE. __________________________ Co-Owner of the thirteen time world champion Green Bay Packers. Sometimes I write about them. Follow me on Twitter at https://x.com/kjones_in_co and on Substack for film breakdowns! __________________________   NFL Categories: Green Bay PackersTags: Green Bay PackersJohnathan GannonNFC NorthNFLNFL Defense Like 0 points
09.02.2026 11:44 — 👍 8    🔁 2    💬 1    📌 0
Pack-A-Day Podcast - Episode 2755 - The Packers Most Likely Free Agent Signings!!! On today's show, Andy goes position-by-position to discuss his most likely free agent addition for each. You won't want to miss it!     Filed Under: Pack A Day Podcast   PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE. __________________________ Andy is a graduate of UW-Oshkosh and owns & operates the Pack-A-Day Podcast. Andy has taken multiple courses in NFL scouting and is an Editor for Packer Report. Andy grew up in Green Bay and is a lifelong season ticket holder - follow him on Twitter @AndyHermanNFL! __________________________ NFL Categories: Green Bay PackersTags: Pack-A-Day PodcastPackers podcastPacker PodcastGreen Bay Packers podcastgreen bay packer Like 0 points
09.02.2026 10:46 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0
Preview
Ranking the 2026 NFL Draft Quarterbacks: Tiers, Traits, And Why the Board Gets Weird Filed Under: NFL DraftNewt Westen   PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE. __________________________ Newt Westen is the Founder of 0-Tech Draft, contributor for The Draft Professor and Lead NFL Draft Analyst for CheeseheadTV.com. He's a lifetime Packers fan and you can follow Newt at @NFLDraft_Westen on X. __________________________ Tags: Green Bay PackersNFL Draft Like 0 points
08.02.2026 19:10 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0
Preview
How the Packers Build Their Defensive Draft Board: Thresholds, Tendencies & Fits Filed Under: Newt WestenPacker Fan Podcasts   PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE. __________________________ Tags: Green Bay PackersPackers DraftNFL Draft Like 0 points
08.02.2026 18:11 — 👍 3    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0
Preview
Returning to Glory Within 1-2 Seasons "Return to Glory." Any Green Bay Packers fan who was around for the 1996 Super Bowl-winning season may remember that this was basically the title given to that historical season. The Packers returned to the Super Bowl for the first time in almost 30 years and won. That season snapped a 29-year run, with the Lombardi era being the only era in the Packers' history to deliver a Super Bowl appearance. Finally, Packers fans weren't living in the 60s anymore when they talked about the Packers actually having some relevance in the NFL. Life was good.  After losing Super Bowl 32 in 1998, Packers fans didn't have to wait 30 more years to make it to the big dance again, for only 13 years later, the Packers were victorious in Super Bowl 45. The return to the promised land with Aaron Rodgers gave Packers fans confidence that they weren't going to return to the dark ages after the departure of legendary quarterback Brett Favre. That Rodgers, the new legendary QB, would keep the hope alive year after year. And indeed, the hope was there, but the Packers would not return to the Super Bowl with Rodgers despite four NFC Championship appearances.  The 2026 season will mark 30 years since the Packers '96 "Return to Glory" season. I'm sure that makes many of you who were around to remember it, including myself, feel old. But fear not, we at least have the Super Bowl 32 appearance and Super Bowl 45 victory since then to fall back on. But despite that little buffer, it's still been 15 years since Super Bowl 45. Those back to the dark ages fears are starting to creep up again, and the Packers need to do everything they can to stomp them out.  What is going "all in"? We hear that phrase all over the sports world that teams went "all in" on winning a championship. Since that phrase became a thing, Packers fans have repeatedly commented on their wishes for the team to do just that. Arguably, the team did just that with the 2021 season when they retained Aaron Rodgers and kept most of the team intact via roster restructures and kicking the salary cap can far down the road. But they fell short. Many fans wouldn't even consider this going "all in" because the Packers didn't exactly bring anyone new into the mix. Just the same roster in their eyes, and they expected better results. They didn't have that "huge addition" that could constitute as going "all in." Well, just before the season started in 2025, the Packers made arguably one of the biggest moves in their franchise history by trading for Micah Parsons. I can't imagine a more "all-in" move than the Parsons trade, and even though the Packers were a bit lacking in some other areas and the 2025 season also fell short, that "all-in" move was for more than just 2025. That move was for 2026 and 2027 as well. But the Packers need to make sure they don't squander it, and they make the right moves needed to ensure it pays off.  When you talk to Brian Gutekunst or Matt LaFleur, they'll tell you that injuries sustained in the 2025 season were no excuse. That can be true, but it can also be a "no use in crying over spilled milk" comment. If you ask me, if you put a healthy Micah Parsons, Tucker Kraft, Devonte Wyatt, Zach Tom, and maybe even Elgton Jenkins on the field for the remainder of the season, which they missed out on, the Packers are probably reigning North division champions, and either they would've made a deeper playoff run, or they would be playing in the Super Bowl tonight. But the past is the past, and it's time to move forward.  Continuing to go "All in." The Micah Parsons trade was outstanding. It instantly made the Packers Super Bowl contenders. But the team cannot be happy with just that if they want to ensure they compete for a title next year.  Free agency may be a place to grab a contributor or two, but the Packers aren't going to break the bank. If anything, they may lose more than they gain in free agency this year. With players like Romeo Doubs, Rasheed Walker, Elgton Jenkins, and possibly Quay Walker all not expected to return next year, they may have a few more starting jobs to fill than they'd like to use on free agents. Center could be a priority in free agency. The Elgton Jenkins playing center experiment failed. Not just because of injury, but it just didn't seem to click, especially in the running game. Sean Rhyan filled in amicably, but not to the level the Packers may need to win a championship. But minus a bargain bin signing here or there, that could be the only place the Packers willingly spend a lot of money.   Without any first-round picks in the next two drafts as a result of the Parsons trade, the Packers need to focus on grabbing some first-year contributors in the draft on days 2 and 3. That means, they need to abandon a draft philosophy that has basically been in place for over 15 years. Instead of drafting players who could develop and contribute down the road, they need to grab players ready to hit the ground running now. No project pass rushers, no offensive linemen who could maybe switch positions and be serviceable mid-way through the season. Players who can push for playing time now over those who could use a year or two.  Everyone will say cornerback is the top draft priority, and they're somewhat right. The Packers could use a new promising face in that room. Gutekunst seems to be satisfied with Keisean Nixon and is optimistic about a Nate Hobbs year 2 breakout, but that can't be relied on. The 2026 draft boasts a strong cornerback class, and there's a chance the Packers could grab one or two good ones to compete for snaps right away in the mid-rounds.  Another place of need is the interior defensive line. After Devonte Wyatt went down, it was like the Packers had no answers. That could be a good place for a low-risk/high-ceiling free agent and also a place for a mid-round pick.  For so long, the Packers have tried to simply plug holes in free agency and use the draft to mainly re-stock their prospects. It's time they do both in the draft. The Green Bay Packers are not going to return to glory with the same old same old philosophy. It's time to think outside the box a bit. Grabbing someone in the early rounds who may be good in 2027 or 2028 makes no sense for the Packers at this time.  Don't just go all in by trading for Micah Parsons and hoping for the best; go all in by switching up the philosophy altogether.      Filed Under: FeaturedGreg Meinholz PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE. __________________________ Greg Meinholz is a lifelong devoted Packer fan. A contributor to CheeseheadTV as well as PackersTalk. Follow him on Twitter @gmeinholz and Bluesky @gmeinholz.bsky.social for Packers commentary, random humor, beer endorsements, and occasional Star Wars and Marvel ramblings. __________________________ NFL Categories: Green Bay PackersTags: Green Bay PackersBrian GutekunstMicah Parsons2026 free agency2026 NFL Draft Like 0 points
08.02.2026 11:40 — 👍 6    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 1
Pack-A-Day Podcast - Episode 2754 - Under the Radar Free Agents the Packers Should Consider!!! Join Andy Herman as he looks at what free agents and trade candidates the Packers should consider outside of their three biggest areas of need. Don't miss it!!!     Filed Under: Pack A Day Podcast   PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE. __________________________ Andy is a graduate of UW-Oshkosh and owns & operates the Pack-A-Day Podcast. Andy has taken multiple courses in NFL scouting and is an Editor for Packer Report. Andy grew up in Green Bay and is a lifelong season ticket holder - follow him on Twitter @AndyHermanNFL! __________________________ NFL Categories: Green Bay PackersTags: Pack-A-Day PodcastPackers podcastPacker PodcastGreen Bay Packers podcastgreen bay packer Like 0 points
08.02.2026 10:41 — 👍 3    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0
Preview
Packers Offensive Draft Thresholds: How Green Bay Builds Its Board Filed Under: Newt WestenPacker Fan Podcasts   PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE. __________________________ Newt Westen is the Founder of 0-Tech Draft, contributor for The Draft Professor and Lead NFL Draft Analyst for CheeseheadTV.com. He's a lifetime Packers fan and you can follow Newt at @NFLDraft_Westen on X. __________________________ Tags: Green Bay PackersNFL Draft Like 0 points
07.02.2026 19:01 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0
Preview
Ask Maggie: Kicking Special Teams to the Curb Welcome back to another edition of Ask Maggie: Your Packers Mailbag! It’s the mailbag you, the readers, help me write each and every week by submitting your questions to chtvmailbag@gmail.com. I couldn’t do this without you. Let’s kick (pun very much intended) things off with a question that isn’t about special teams, because that’s coming later.  “Do you have any concerns about Gannon staying for 2 years and leaving again for a head coaching job? Yes he did poorly in AZ, but with the talent he has here I could see him follow a Hafley route and then the team has to start from square one to learn a new system etc. Should longevity play any role in the hiring of coordinator positions or should you just pick the person you think is best and let the chips fall where they may?” - Tony I think you answered your question there at the very end. They say the NFL stands for “Not For Long” for a reason. Depending on your thoughts on the current Packers team, you may think their Super Bowl window is closed. You may think they have two years left. You may think they have longer than two years. However you feel, if Green Bay thinks Gannon is the guy to lead the defense in that time span, that’s why you make the hire. Even if he’s only with the Packers for a single season and then lands a head coaching job in 2027, you still make the selection given what you think you can get out of him right now.  Look at a team like the Rams. Sean McVay has been with the team since 2017. In that time he had Matt LaFleur, Kevin O’Connell, Liam Coen, and Mike LaFleur as his offensive coordinators, and all of them are now head coaches in the NFL. On defense he had Wade Phillips, Brandon Staley, Raheem Morris, and Chris Shula (who had plenty of interviews for a head coaching job of his own). And yet despite all of that turnover, the Rams have made the playoffs seven times and appeared in two Super Bowls, winning one. The most successful teams are always going to have a high turnover rate because success breeds opportunity. Any team that didn’t have a successful season is going to be looking at the ones that did and trying to figure out what they can replicate. So no, I don’t have any concerns about Gannon possibly only being around for two years. Hopefully by the time he’s offered another crack at a head coaching gig, he’s got some shiny new hardware to bring with him.  “How do we like international games? As a Berliner (Germany) I’m really hoping for a Berlin game with the Packers. But I get that it’s unfavorable by the base.” - Teerohr I personally love international games. I know that I’m spoiled living in Wisconsin and I don’t take it for granted that I’m fortunate enough to get to at least one Packers game a season at Lambeau Field. I suppose I can understand the argument that Green Bay doesn’t want to give up home games given how much they do for the local economy, but with the 17th game added onto the schedule, giving up the ninth and “extra” home game feels like a fair trade. Regardless, I love any opportunity for fans to get to see their favorite team. I’ve talked to a ton of international fans and the dedication you all show your team is unreal. The time zone difference to watch your team in the middle of the night or early hours of the morning is one thing. But I’ve also heard plenty of stories about how hard it was to even find information about the Packers before things like the internet and streaming services made that a little bit easier. Relying on newspapers or tickers on the bottom of TV screens to even try to catch the score of the most recent game. Talk about diehards. The only negative I could think of would be that I can see why it would be a bummer for fans that live in other parts of the U.S. to have Packers road games flexed, simply because the Packers may not be in their location often. For example, if the Packers vs Steelers game had been the Ireland game this past season, I could understand why that would be a bummer for fans that live in the Pittsburgh area or within driving distance. That’s a trip they’d likely make knowing it only happens once every eight years. That said, a trip somewhere like Berlin would happen even less likely, I’d have to think, so I’m always in support of international fans getting to see their team in-person. I know how much the Brazil game meant to fans in 2024, even with the extended flight times. The NFL is getting better at managing logistics to make these trips easier for teams, too. So that is an incredibly long answer to say hell yeah, I am always down for international games and for as many fans as possible to get to cheer on their team in-person. For some people it might really be a “once in a lifetime” opportunity.  “What, if anything, stood out to you in Gutey’s press conference? Anything make you go “hmmm”?” - Jim  We’ll save his comments about special teams for a little bit later on, but something I thought was interesting was his comment about Jordan Morgan at left tackle, specifically when he said "I thought he played really well in the preseason at that spot, probably did enough to win that job, but then we had some injuries and had to do what was best for the team.” I never felt like Rasheed Walker was going to be back in Green Bay this offseason, but for Gute to say Morgan probably did enough to win the LT job coming out of camp, only for the Packers to not utilize him there, was telling. I know the Packers love offensive linemen who cross-train and can play everywhere, which Morgan did do in 2025 (he made a start everywhere but center), but it certainly sounds like he’ll have every opportunity to be the team’s left tackle of the future, which we expected when he was drafted in the first round in 2024.  It maybe wasn’t surprising, but Gutekunst also said he feels good about where the team is at regarding cap space going into free agency, should they wish to spend. I think we all have our thoughts on players the team may move on from (ahem, Rashan Gary) to free up some money, so it’ll be interesting to see if the Packers take any swings at positions of need like they did last season with Aaron Banks and Nate Hobbs.  “What are fans being reasonable about this offseason? What are fans being unreasonable about?” - Sam Sam, you’re trying to get me in trouble. But I’ll be honest, I haven’t seen too many inflammatory takes floating around. I’m sure they exist, though. I would say concerns about the coaching staff are all reasonable. I get that there’s a portion of the fanbase that doesn’t think LaFleur is the right guy for the job and they think as long as he’s head coach, the Super Bowl window is closed. I don’t agree with that take, but given the recent losses in back-to-back Wild Card games, I don’t fault anyone for their feelings. I also understand why fans have concerns about the coaching staff, even if they do think LaFleur is the right guy as head coach. It’s impossible not to be frustrated with the results we’ve seen on special teams. It’s fair to question why the offensive line has regressed, even beyond the unfortunate injury luck this past season. A lot of that comes down to coaching, so it’s completely reasonable for the fans to want more from a front office that’s spoken a lot about the urgency to win a championship.  I guess if I had to pick a recent example of an unreasonable take, it’s anyone thinking Jordan Love isn’t the guy at quarterback. I’m not sure how anyone can watch the Packers offense and think Love is ever the problem. He had a couple of ugly interceptions this season, but that’s really the only thing I’d nitpick about, and we had a quarterback in Green Bay for 16 years who’s in the Hall of Fame and threw what felt like one ugly pick per game. Love threw for 323 yards and four touchdowns in the Wild Card game. If there was anything to dislike about the offense’s productivity down the stretch, I would argue it stemmed from playcalling and decision-making (like handoffs on second and long), not who’s throwing the ball.  Just for comparison’s sake, I thought these numbers were fun. Through his first three seasons as Green Bay’s starter (47 games), Love has a record of 27-19-1. He’s thrown for 10,929 yards with a completion percentage of 64.5%. He has 80 touchdowns and 28 interceptions.  In Aaron Rodgers’ first three seasons as a starter (47 games), he went 27-20. He threw for 12,394 yards with a completion percentage of 64.6%. He had 86 touchdowns and 31 picks.  Finally, in Brett Favre’s first three seasons as a starter (45 games), he went 26-19. He threw for 10,412 yards with a completion percentage of 62.4%. He had 70 touchdowns and 51 interceptions.  So there we have it. See you in Canton, Jordan. Anyone that doesn’t think you’re the guy isn’t invited to your jersey retirement at Lambeau. “Re: Bisaccia - why?” - Tony This made me audibly laugh when I opened the email. It paired perfectly with Jim’s question above about things from Gutey’s presser that gave me pause. I don’t love calling for anyone’s job. It’s simply not my style. But repeated special teams blunders sure are hard to watch each season. And I understand the argument that the coaches aren’t the ones executing each week, so if Romeo Doubs can’t secure an onside kick that isn’t entirely Rich’s fault, but I’m not sure how anyone at 1265 Lombardi can watch Green Bay’s special teams and think the product on the field is capable of winning championships.  Take kickoffs for example. I’m not sure why it was such an issue for McManus all season to kick the ball between the end zone and the 20-yard line. Instead, he was consistently kicking the ball into the end zone, giving opposing teams the ball at the 35-yard line.  On the year, McManus was 18/18 on field goals inside 39 yards and 6/12 on anything over 40 yards. That’s a 50% success rate on kicks of 40+ yards in a league where Jaguars kicker Cam Little just set an NFL record this season with a 68-yard field goal.  I think it has to be Daniel Whelan. He’s been Whelan and dealin’ too much and he’s keeping Bisaccia employed.  But that’ll do it for this week! We’ll be switching to Fridays for the offseason schedule, so you’ll have one less day to get your questions in! Save me from extended special teams conversation (just kidding, kind of) by emailing your questions to chtvmailbag@gmail.com. Filed Under: FeaturedMaggie Loney   PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE. __________________________ Maggie Loney is a writer for Cheesehead TV and podcaster for the Pack-A-Day Podcast and Pack's What She Said. Find her on Twitter at @MaggieJLoney. __________________________ NFL Categories: Green Bay PackersTags: Rich BisacciaSpecial TeamsJordan LoveBrian GutekunstJonathan Gannon Like 0 points
07.02.2026 18:38 — 👍 10    🔁 4    💬 0    📌 1
Preview
Are the Packers Good Enough at Cornerback to Compete for a Super Bowl? Green Bay Packers general manager Brian Gutekunst addressed the media on Wednesday for his season-ending press conference. As always with these events, fans have to read between the lines and cut through the cliches to figure out what is really being said or hinted at. But Gutekunst surprised many observers when he indicated that fans should not expect major chances at the cornerback position this offseason. Gutekunst fielded a question about overhauling the cornerback room. His answer was direct. “We had some injuries there. Hobbs missed most of the season, never really got going,” Gutekunst said. “I thought Carrington [Valentine] stepped in and did a great job; he’s a young player that’s still getting better. Keisean [Nixon] had a very, very good year, he was in the top three in PBUs and did some really good things. So, do we need wholesale changes? No. I do think it’s an area though that those guys can get hurt, they’re the smaller guys on the field, we ask a lot of those guys in run support, so depth there for me is important that we have answers.” The Packers cornerback room had a very uneven season in 2025, and it went beyond injuries. For the entire season, the team’s top three cornerbacks combined for one interception and that was the game-clinching pick by Nixon in the Packers win over the Bears at Lambeau Field. The team’s top cover corner was Nixon, but few NFL scouts would grade him as a legitimate CB1 or as an elite cover corner. Of the 112 cornerbacks who played enough snaps to be ranked, Nixon did not grade out in the top 32. His season proved to be uneven. Yes, he got off to a good start. Nixon broke up five passes in one game in Week 2 against the Commanders. He did set a career high with 17 passes broken up for the season. In his first six seasons in the NFL, he had a combined total of 16. But the improvement was largely tied to the improved early season pass rush and the addition of Micah Parsons to the Green Bay defense. Because Nixon and the other Packers corners knew opposing quarterbacks would be forced to get rid of the ball quickly, they could concentrate of denying the short pass. But when the pass rush slowed down after both Devonte Wyatt and Parsons were lost for the season, Nixon and the other Packers cornerbacks were exposed. Opposing quarterbacks had success throwing to receivers covered by Nixon this season. According to pro-football-reference.com, they completed 64.4 percent of their passes and had a quarterback rating of 105.1 when throwing to receivers covered by Nixon. Valentine improved a bit in coverage but still has more room to improve. His tackling remains a major liability, and he needs to at least become average in this area. In no way can he be considered a CB1. If he continues to work hard, he could develop into a reliable CB2. Hobbs did struggle with injuries, but the questions surrounding him go beyond that. During his first four NFL seasons, Hobbs played best in the slot. When the Packers signed him to a four-year, $48 million free agent contract last offseason, they did so with the belief he could also play well on the boundary. But when he was on the field last season, Hobbs struggled on the boundary. The Packers must determine whether his disappointing play was due to injuries or if he’s just not suited to play on the boundary. If he can’t play outside, he becomes a player without a position and a very expensive depth piece. He would be the team’s third best player in the slot behind Javon Bullard and Nixon, and their third best boundary corner at best. If injuries were to strike any of the top three corners on the depth chart, the team would have to give extensive playing time to unproven players at the position. The Packers have not selected a cornerback before the seventh round of the NFL Draft since 2021 when they chose Eric Stokes in the first round. If the Packers truly want to compete for a Super Bowl, having an elite cover would be a big help. Contending teams usually have talented and productive wide receivers. Containing them becomes critical for any defense. Right now, the Packers lack a bona fide CB1. Adding one this offseason, whether via free agency, trade, or the draft, could add another strong dimension to the defense. Was Gutekunst trying to downplay the need to distract opposing teams, or does he seriously believe this team has enough talent and depth at the position? We’ll find out this offseason. Filed Under: FeaturedGil Martin   PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE. __________________________ You can follow Gil Martin on Twitter @GilPackers __________________________ NFL Categories: Green Bay PackersTags: Green Bay PackersBrian GutekunstKeisean NixonCarrington ValentineNate Hobbs Like 0 points
07.02.2026 15:38 — 👍 4    🔁 0    💬 2    📌 0
Preview
Cory's Corner: It's Time To Lock Up Tuck The Packers’ top priority this offseason is Tuck.  Green Bay has to lock up Tucker Kraft. The tight end had 32 catches for 489 and six touchdowns in eight games before tearing his right ACL. He was arguably the best tight end in the NFL and was quickly becoming his own highlight reel.  He enters the final year of his rookie contract in 2026 and now is the time for the Packers to reward him. “Tuck means a lot,” said Jordan Love. “His leadership role and then obviously his play on the field. He’s been playing at a high level.” Kraft, 25, is a pillar of the team’s culture. He goes out every play — no matter if he gets the ball or not. He is a very good blocker and most importantly, isn’t taking anything for granted.  I was a big fan of the third round pick coming out of South Dakota State because he never shied away from hard work. He had his draft party at the AirKraft Spraying hangar in his hometown of Timber Lake, S.D.  He’s always been a perfect match for the Packers and he was actually my favorite pick the Packers made in the 2023 NFL Draft. That’s ahead of tight end Luke Musgrave and wide receiver Jayden Reed — both were taken in the second round.  The key with Kraft is that he has proven that he will put the team over himself. He has already led by example and now the team needs him to be even more vocal after this next contract.  It may sound weird, but I think Kraft can be a focal point of this offense. That doesn’t make any sense because tight ends aren’t usually the focal point of anything in the NFL. More often than not, they are just a forgotten footnote or a security blanket that the quarterback always seems to find when the pocket has vanished.  “He’s a powerful dude, he runs extremely hard, I love how he finishes,” said Packers coach Matt LaFleur. Believe it or not, Kraft tallied 15.3 yards per reception this past season, which was easily No. 1 for the best tight end, but Kraft’s smaller sample also beat out Seattle’s Jaxon Smith-Njigba — who Steve Young recently compared to Jerry Rice.  Kraft had six catches over 20 yards and two over 40. Once he gets rolling up to full speed, defensive players don’t want to tackle him because he just turns into fullback mode and wants to run people over.  He’s got the trust not just of the offense, but the entire locker room and everybody is rooting for him to make a strong comeback.  Giving Kraft a long-term deal would mean that the Packers are looking out for Tuck’s future but it also means Green Bay is looking out for their own. He desperately wants to see success for this franchise and he’s going to hold other players accountable if they don’t fall in line.  It should be pretty cut and dry for the Packers. Sign Kraft and get a guy that every head coach in the league would love to have — both for his on the field ability and his off the field mentality.  Filed Under: Packers NewsFeaturedGreen Bay Packers   PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE. __________________________ Cory Jennerjohn is a graduate from UW-Oshkosh and has been in sports media for over 15 years. He was a co-host on "Clubhouse Live" and has also done various radio and TV work as well. He has written for newspapers, magazines and websites. He currently is a columnist for CHTV and also does various podcasts. He recently earned his Masters degree from the University of Iowa. He can be found on Twitter: @Coryjennerjohn __________________________ NFL Categories: Green Bay PackersTags: Tucker KraftJordan LoveMatt LaFleur Like 0 points
07.02.2026 12:38 — 👍 9    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0
Pack-A-Day Podcast - Episode 2753 - Packers Free Agent & Trade Targets: CB On today's show, Andy scans through the available cornerbacks this offseason to see if there's a fit for the Packers. Don't miss it!!!     Filed Under: Pack A Day Podcast   PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE. __________________________ Andy is a graduate of UW-Oshkosh and owns & operates the Pack-A-Day Podcast. Andy has taken multiple courses in NFL scouting and is an Editor for Packer Report. Andy grew up in Green Bay and is a lifelong season ticket holder - follow him on Twitter @AndyHermanNFL! __________________________ NFL Categories: Green Bay PackersTags: Pack-A-Day PodcastPackers podcastPacker PodcastGreen Bay Packers podcastgreen bay packer Like 0 points
07.02.2026 10:37 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0
Preview
What We Learned from Brian Gutekunst’s Press Conference Green Bay Packers General Manager Brian Gutekunst met with the media this week for the first time following his team’s ugly end-of-season meltdown. A 9-3-1 teamy not-so-memorabl finished with five straight losses, including a heartbreaking playoff exit at the hands of the Chicago Bears. Packers fans walked away from this week’s press conference not knowing much of anything about the future, however. Why? Because Gutekunst just doesn’t typically reveal much in these sessions. Let’s all remember that two years ago at this time, he sang the praises of then-Packers running back Aaron Jones, a longtime team staple and fan favorite. "He's such an influential leader in our locker room and he's just kind of the heartbeat of our team,” Gutekunst said. “That's kind of the anticipation, that he'll be back." A month later, the GM signed free agent Josh Jacobs, and when the announcement was made, the fanbase had about 15 minutes of glee, imagining a Jacobs-Jones one-two punch in the Packers’ backfield. And then the word came out that the Packers had released Jones, who quickly became a Minnesota Viking. Psyche. So, in this week’s presser, the reported quote that probably rang the most true for me was this one: “I don’t think we’ve made any decisions on anybody yet." He was speaking to a question about cornerback Nate Hobbs and guard Aaron Banks, both of whom were signed to hefty contracts last off-season, only to underperform, in part due to injury. But it harkens to the Jones situation two years ago – Gutekunst also this week offered confidence in Rashan Gary, who disappeared in the second half of the season, and special teams coordinator Rich Bissacia, whose teams units have underperformed ever since he took over. The fan base, and even some Packers media, would have told you Bisaccia would have already been out the door during the coaching hiring/firing cycle, but here he remains. And Gary has not performed at a high level, at least not consistently, since signing a four-year, $96 million contract extension.  After Week 8 last year, it wouldn’t be surprising if Gary had forgotten what a quarterback even looked like, let alone getting his mitts on one. And yet … “I thought he started out really, really strong,” Gutekunst told the media (which was fair). “He obviously had a lot of production early. I think he ended up with 60-some pressures, 7.5 sacks. That’s pretty good production in the National Football League.” Obviously, the GM watched the games. He saw what everyone saw – that Gary disappeared down the stretch. And the EDGE rusher’s cap hit is about to balloon to $28 million in 2026. One of the more memorable visuals of the season was his running mate, Micah Parsons, who led the team with 12.5 sacks and was a force on the field until he got injured in Week 15, literally running past Gary in pursuit of an escaping Bo Nix. Yuck. Gutekunst made the comment that he expects all the players on contract to be back. The smart money is on Gary, at the very least, being asked to take a pay cut. Why waste snaps and big money on Gary with two young pass rushers who need experience and a returning Lukas Van Ness? The point to all this is that a February Brian Gutekunst press conference isn’t going to yield much in the way of tangible information. Let’s face it: No decisions have been officially made yet. It’s frustrating if you’re a member of the media looking for a story, or a fan looking for hope for 2026 after such a rotten finish to 2025. But for now, it’s all we have. "It's all of us, right? It's players, it's coaches, it's everybody," the GM said. "In certain football situations, we have to be better, and we have to be more consistent. For me, there's two things. One, do we have the right people out there that can handle those situations? And then two, are we doing everything to give them the best chance to succeed? We're looking at it from all avenues." There’s your hope, for what it’s worth. When’s the next press conference again? Filed Under: FeaturedKevin Gibson   PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE. __________________________ Kevin Gibson is a professional writer and author based in Louisville, Ky. He's also a former sports writer who covered high school, college and professional sports, a Packers shareholder and a fan since 1975. Even John Hadl couldn't break him. Follow him on Twitter: @kgramone __________________________   NFL Categories: Green Bay PackersTags: Brian GutekunstRashan GaryMicah Parsonsaaron Jones Like 0 points
06.02.2026 20:37 — 👍 9    🔁 1    💬 0    📌 0
Preview
Too Much Brake, Not Enough Gas Matt LaFleur is back in Green Bay – and certainly to mixed reviews. For LaFleur’s detractors, the primary critiques seem to be his inability to hold leads, his lack of success in the playoffs, and his inability to fix special teams/his stubborn loyalty to Coach Bisaccia. Other critiques certainly exist, but based on my very unscientific review of twitter, those seem to be the headliners.   I’ll add another to the list, which I don’t hear nearly as often, and that’s LaFleur’s curious reluctance to just cut Jordan Love loose.  That was certainly my biggest takeaway from the Chicago playoff debacle. On that frigid night, away from home, Love was unstoppable. He threw for 323 yards and 4 TDs (three of those TDs in the first half), and didn’t turn it over once against a Bears defense that led the league in interceptions and takeaways. Were it not for a Jayden Reed drop and some poor pass protection on a deep crosser to Christian Watson, Love, in all likelihood, would’ve thrown a 5th TD and won that game.  Instead, Love became just the third quarterback in NFL history to lose a playoff game while throwing at least four pass touchdowns and no interceptions. Yes, football is a team game, and in that particular game, Love’s team failed to deliver. Alongside Reed’s critical drop, there were the missed kicks. In the second half, the Packers had only one running play that gained more than a single yard – one! On the other side of the ball, the Packers defense cowered without Edgerrin Cooper, allowing 25 fourth quarter points.  These failings bring me back to LaFleur.  His offense had amassed an 18-point 1st half lead because Chicago had no answers for the red hot Love. When the Packers got the ball to start the second half, I was like music producer Bruce Dickinson with a fever – the only prescription was more Love. Instead, for reasons, LaFleur seemed to turn away from what had worked so well in the first half. He tilted conservative, and almost immediately, the Packers’ first half momentum began to dissipate. Where the first three first half possessions began: touchdown, touchdown, touchdown. The second half sputtered: punt, punt, punt.  In the 3rd quarter, LaFleur called three running plays that gained 5 yards. In the 4th quarter, LaFleur called four running plays that gained just 1 yard.  When the Bears climbed back to within a score early in the 4th quarter, LaFleur seemed to turn back to Love out of necessity, and once again, Love dutifully diced up the Chicago secondary en route to a Matthew Golden touchdown.   Listen, I get it, in an ideal football world, you want balance. As a coach you feel almost obligated to call a few run plays so the defense isn’t completely dialed into the pass. But at the same point, particularly when Love is on a heater the way he was in Chicago, sometimes I wish LaFleur would just abandon the charade and dare teams to stop his superstar. Make the other team prove they can stop you before you go away from something voluntarily.  Packers fans will call me crazy – I can already hear the “delusional” ridicule in the comments –  and I don’t care. I really and truly think Jordan Love is on the cusp of being the best quarterback in football. League MVP. Better than Mahomes, better than Allen, better than all of them.  His performance in Chicago was as good as any playoff performance I’ve seen, by anyone. Missing 4 of the team’s top 7 players, on the road, and with his whole team underperforming, he still very nearly carried them to victory.  The Packers head into next season locked and loaded, and are once again poised to be among the NFL’s elite. There’s some fixing to do in the trenches, but I have confidence this team can get there via the draft and free agency.  At the offensive skill positions, the Packers appear deadly. Christian Watson seems ready to settle in as the Packers WR1, Golden certainly flashed his potential in Chicago, Kraft will be back, and though Doubs is likely gone via free agency, Reed, Wicks, Williams, and Musgrave offer more than serviceable depth.  Of all the reasons to keep LaFleur in Green Bay that I heard this offseason, the most compelling came from Domonique Foxworth, who said that the Packers have “what feels like the brass ring when it comes to hiring a coach (which) is a play caller who is on the same page as your quarterback.”  Foxworth’s point is valid. This coach and player have years of chemistry together, and I’m sure – important lessons learned from the losses. Tough as they are, there’s real value in those mutual experiences. Trust and closeness are often born from shared tribulation. Supporting that point, in his final press conference, Love threw his backing behind LaFleur, saying, “I definitely think Matt should be the head coach. I’ve got a lot of love for Matt and I think he does a great job and that’s it.” Hopefully, Love’s faith in his head coach is reciprocated in 2026 with a coach that’s confident and more willing to lean on his quarterback when necessary, the way other coaches and quarterbacks have done in Green Bay, in Championships past.   Filed Under: FeaturedMark Ballard PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE. __________________________ Mark Ballard is an obsessive Green Bay Packers fan, born in Buffalo Bills country, but raised right by a Mom from Rice Lake, WI. You can find him on X at @ballark __________________________ NFL Categories: Green Bay PackersTags: Matt LaFleurJordan Love Like 0 points
06.02.2026 15:35 — 👍 11    🔁 1    💬 1    📌 1
Pack-A-Day Podcast - Episode 2752 - Packers Free Agent & Trade Targets: DT On today's show, Andy takes a look at which defensive tackles the Packers could target via free agency and trade this offseason. Don't miss it!!!     Filed Under: Pack A Day Podcast   PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE. __________________________ Andy is a graduate of UW-Oshkosh and owns & operates the Pack-A-Day Podcast. Andy has taken multiple courses in NFL scouting and is an Editor for Packer Report. Andy grew up in Green Bay and is a lifelong season ticket holder - follow him on Twitter @AndyHermanNFL! __________________________ NFL Categories: Green Bay PackersTags: Pack-A-Day PodcastPackers podcastPacker PodcastGreen Bay Packers podcastgreen bay packer Like 0 points
06.02.2026 10:34 — 👍 2    🔁 1    💬 0    📌 0
Preview
One Yard Short of Forever: Remembering the 1983 Green Bay Packers On the first of this month AMC premiered a new docuseries “The Rise of the 49ers.” Encapsulating the NFL franchise’s rise from underdogs to champions from the 1980s to the 1990s. Watching the first episode with the guy who inspired my fandom of the Green Bay Packers, I was inclined to asking my dad who his all-time favorite Packers team was. Born in 1963, my dad would vividly entail the story of the 1983 Green Bay Packers. They didn’t hang a banner. They didn’t play in January. And yet, more than four decades later, the 1983 Green Bay Packers still live vividly in the hearts of the faithful reckless, thrilling, flawed, and unforgettable. That team was offense incarnate. A weekly fireworks display powered by quarterback Lynn Dickey, who in 1983 rewrote the Packers’ record book by throwing for more than 4,400 yards more than any Green Bay quarterback ever had to that point. Dickey was fearless, proven to his 32:29 TD to Interception ratio. He stood tall, took hits, kept firing, and delivered the ball to a dazzling collection of skill players who turned Sundays at Lambeau Field into track meets. Wide receivers James Lofton and John Jefferson formed one of the most dangerous duos in football, stretching defenses vertically and horizontally, while tight end Paul Coffman punished the middle of the field with precision and toughness. In the backfield, Gary Ellis and Eddie Lee Ivory provided balance and grit, keeping defenses honest and adding to an offense that felt capable of scoring from anywhere, at any time. It was a high-octane machine fast, aggressive, and endlessly entertaining. And it had to be. Because on the other side of the ball, the Packers’ defense was, charitably, a gamble. Fans watched opponents slice through it with alarming ease, earning the unit its infamous reputation as a “Swiss cheese” defense. If Green Bay was going to win, they would almost certainly have to outscore you. Quite often, they did. The defining night of the season and perhaps of the era came on Monday Night Football against Washington. In a game that felt more like a video game than an NFL contest, the Packers outlasted the Redskins 48–47 in what was then the highest-scoring Monday night game in history. Dickey threw, Lofton flew, Jefferson dazzled, Coffman delivered clutch plays, and Green Bay Nation roared. It was pure joy, pure chaos, and pure 1983 Packers football. By season’s end, Green Bay stood at 8–7, a record that barely hinted at how close they were to something special. Everything came down to the final game of the year in Chicago. Win, and the Packers would claim the division and return to the playoffs. Lose, and the season would dissolve into what-ifs. The Bears, battered and without Walter Payton, seemed ripe for the taking. Green Bay took a one-point lead with just over three minutes remaining. All they needed was one stop. One moment. One stand. It never came. Chicago methodically drove the length of the field while the Packers still holding three timeouts watched the clock bleed away. The Bears kicked the winning field goal. The season ended. So did an era. It was the final chapter for head coach Bart Starr, the legendary quarterback turned leader on the sideline, whose tenure ended shortly after that crushing loss. Starr had brought dignity, pride, and belief back to Green Bay, and though the results never fully matched the hope, the 1983 team felt like his last, best shot. They were imperfect. They were frustrating. They were wildly fun. And that’s where a lifelong favorite often can originate. The 1983 Green Bay Packers reminded a generation of fans what joy looked like after years of struggle. They made Lambeau loud again. They made Monday nights magical. They made you believe right up until the final kick sailed through the uprights in Chicago. They were one stop away from capturing a division that had evaded them for the previous decade.  And even without it, they’re still remembered, players still celebrated, and moments still loved, especially through my dad. Without a doubt, championships immortalize a team. The pinnacle of success was captured.  Sometimes however, a team that left us with only an imagination of that glory can last just as long.   Happy 76th Birthday, Lynn Dickey! 1982 saw Lynn lead the #Packers to their first postseason appearance in a decade, and first postseason victory since Super Bowl II. The following season, the veteran Green Bay field general led the #NFL in passing yards and passing touchdowns,… pic.twitter.com/0TduL0AkIm — Kevin Gallagher (@KevG163) October 19, 2025 For Keith Leavitt Sr. Filed Under: FeaturedLuke Leavitt Luke Leavitt is a Contributor for Cheesehead TV, covering the Green Bay Packers. A Manchester by the Sea, Massachussetts native, Luke is a lifelong Packer fan, and 15-year shareholder. Keep up with Luke on X @LukeLeavitt7 Go Pack Go! NFL Categories: Green Bay Packers Like 0 points
05.02.2026 23:32 — 👍 5    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0
Preview
Packers Daily: Consistently Waiting On Lukas Van Ness Listen to the podcast here: Find all of my daily podcasts here. Filed Under: Aaron Nagler#PackersDailyPacker Fan Podcasts   PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE. __________________________ Tags: Green Bay PackersPackers Daily Like 0 points
05.02.2026 22:47 — 👍 4    🔁 2    💬 0    📌 0
Preview
Kingsley Enagbare: The Case for Re-Signing or Letting Him Walk The Green Bay Packers are about to embark on an offseason filled with free-agent departures. A few of them, such as Malik Willis, Romeo Doubs, and Rasheed Walker, are all but guaranteed to be continuing their careers outside of Green Bay. Others, such as Quay Walker and Sean Rhyan, could easily find their way back to Green Bay and be on the 2026 roster. One player who is headed for unrestricted free agency and is sort of in no man’s land is Kingsley Enagbare. Should the Packers seriously consider re-signing the former South Carolina Gamecock, or should they let him walk and start a remake of the edge rusher depth? Just like his fellow soon-to-be unrestricted brethren, Enagbare was a part of one of Brian Gutekunst’s more impressive draft hauls in 2022. Over the years, he has slowly become a steadier contributor along the defensive line, playing right around 45% of the defensive snaps over the last three seasons. However, the decision to re-sign him is a bit more complicated than it may seem on the surface. Case for Re-Signing The easiest argument to make for bringing Kingsley back is the fact that he has played pretty well when given the opportunity. To start 2025, while he was receiving minimal snaps between Weeks 1–5 (roughly 25%), his stats were fairly nondescript. Turn the page to Weeks 7–13, when his playing time increased to 46%, and he registered 18 total tackles, five quarterback hits, three tackles for loss, and a sack. In the Thanksgiving Day game, while his counterpart Rashan Gary was virtually invisible, Enagbare was the second-best edge rusher on the field for Green Bay and finished with a half-sack, a tackle, and a quarterback hit across 27 defensive snaps. Nothing mind-blowing, but behind Micah Parsons, the Packers’ depth is pretty untested. Rashan Gary is all but gone. The Packers stand to gain too much cap space by letting him walk, and he is unlikely to take a pay cut. Lukas Van Ness should be ready to replace him as a starter opposite Parsons, but that will be a new role for him. He also missed a large chunk of the 2025 season due to a foot injury. If Enagbare leaves, then next man up would be second-year players Barryn Sorrell and Collin Oliver. Sorrell only played 15% of the snaps as a rookie, so taking over Enagbare’s snaps would represent a 30% increase. Would he be able to sustain that over a 17-game season plus the playoffs? Oliver played even fewer snaps due to essentially redshirting his rookie season. Trusting the third- and fourth-edge rusher roles to them would be a lot to ask. An injury to Parsons or Van Ness would spell serious trouble. Enagbare has been durable throughout his career, playing in 68 games, and the Packers could use someone they can count on to suit up every week. Yes, the team could address the position via the draft or by signing a different free agent, but the Packers tend to re-sign their own guys. Enagbare is only 26 years old, has been a productive edge rusher in the past, and is also a good run defender. He has given the Packers the kind of production that might make it hard to simply let him walk and hope for the development of younger players. Case Against Re-Signing The biggest case against re-signing Kingsley Enagbare is dollars and cents. Edge rushers play such an important role in today’s NFL that even halfway decent ones can clean up on the open market. While Spotrac is projecting just a two-year contract worth about $11.8 million (or $5.9 million per season), if teams miss out on their top options or a bidding war ensues and that contract value balloons, then Green Bay just won’t have the dollars to match. The team has work to do just to become cap-compliant, and shelling out big money for someone who hasn’t been a consistent starter in his career is likely a no-go. Outside of money, the biggest elephant in the room—not only with Enagbare, but with all Packers edge rushers—is the lack of production after Micah Parsons was lost for the season with a torn ACL. During the Packers’ five-game losing streak post-Parsons injury, Enagbare registered zero sacks. At times, it seemed the Packers couldn’t even get close to the opposing quarterback without No. 1 (because they couldn’t). Now, that isn’t solely the fault of Enagbare, but he was out-snapping Gary at the end of the season and was basically neck and neck with Van Ness for most snaps played. If he had been able to take the next step and replace some of the production lost with Parsons, then re-signing him would be a no-brainer. Lastly is the all-important compensatory pick. And boy, do the Packers love their compensatory picks. With Spotrac’s projected contract at two years, $11.8 million, the Packers would be in line to recoup a sixth-round pick if they let Enagbare leave. Considering he was originally a fifth-round pick in 2022, getting four solid seasons out of him and then receiving a sixth-rounder to replace him isn’t a bad trade-off. They also won’t have a first-round pick in the 2027 draft, so stacking picks to give added flexibility to move up the board will have added appeal to Gutekunst. Weighing all the pros and cons, it makes sense to explore re-signing Enagbare. If that projected contract stays in that range, the Packers can make the numbers work. This year’s smaller-than-normal draft haul needs to be allocated toward fixing the cornerback, defensive line, and offensive line positions. With Parsons likely going to miss the first quarter of the season, relying solely on Van Ness, Sorrell, Oliver, and company could spell trouble. This is a roster that is Super Bowl–ready, and Enagbare is entering the prime age of his career, where he could still take the next step. Filed Under: NFL DraftGreen Bay PackersDan Saia -Dan Saia NFL Categories: Green Bay PackersTags: Kingsley EnagbareGreen Bay Packers free agents2026 offseason Like 0 points
05.02.2026 20:32 — 👍 6    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0
Preview
Are the Packers Making a Mistake by Keeping Rich Bisaccia? Green Bay Packers general manager Brian Gutekunst held his season-ending press conference on February 4th to address the state of the team heading into the offseason. One thing Gutekunst made clear was that special teams coordinator Rich Bisaccia would be returning next season despite the team’s continued struggles in this area. Gutekunst made it clear he has confidence in Bisaccia and the direction the Packers special teams are heading in. “What Rich brings to our culture, this football team, he’s a very impactful coach around here,” Gutekunst said. “I thought we’ve been better on [special] teams these last few years than we’ve been in a long time. Our cover units have been better, we have one of the best punters in the National Football League, an excellent snapper…I've got a lot of faith in Rich and his staff, what they do around here, not only the X's and O's and what they bring to the field, but what they bring to this place culturally is really important.”  There was some truth to this assessment. The Packers punt and kick coverage units statistically did improve a bit this season. The punt coverage unit ranked fourth in average yards allowed per return while the kick ranked 11th. That overlooks some key longer returns allowed by the team at inopportune times which helped give the Packers opponents a short field in key points in the game. There were no issues with the punting game. Daniel Whelan led the NFL in average yards per punt. This was the first time a Packers punter accomplished that goal and the first time a punter averaged more than 50 yards per kick in Packers history. That’s not an easy accomplishment when kicking in the cold and windy conditions at Lambeau Field in the second half of the season. But problems persisted with special teams. Missed or blocked field goals cost the team at least three wins this season including in their playoff loss to the Bears. Lining up Luke Musgrave, who is not known for his blocking, next to the inexperienced Brant Banks on the field goal protection unit cost the Packers a blocked kick that caused them to lose a game. There were times when special teams didn’t have 11 players on the field and cost the team timeouts. The Packers also committed too many penalties on special teams that cost them field position both when they were blocking on returns and when they were covering punts and kickoffs. The kickers also struggled to get kicks into the landing zone far too often, something that other teams in the league seemed to have had little difficulty with. Then there was the decision to allow Brandon McManus to play when he appeared not to be fully healthy. McManus struggled through the season in large part due to injuries. But it is up to Bisaccia to determine whether his kicker is healthy enough to be effective and play well. Gutekunst also indicated he would pay McManus his $1 million roster bonus which means McManus will at least be in training camp to battle for the kicking job again next season.   Bisaccia also never found the right return specialists. The Packers longest kick return this season was just 36 yards. Their punt returners were near the bottom of the league. The Packers just couldn’t find a reliable and consistent return specialist. The decision to not utilize two-time All Pro return specialist Keisean Nixon until the playoffs was understandable, but the team never found a replacement who was even close to as dangerous. On punt returns, neither Romeo Doubs nor Matthew Golden gave the team much juice. The special teams units ultimately cost the Packers at least three wins. That would have meant possibly winning the NFC North and getting at least one home playoff game this season. Regardless, it appears Bisaccia will be returning. Hopefully, he can improve the Packers special teams units in 2026 and have them do no harm to the team in key situations. If not, this decision to bring him back will look like a big mistake for the organization.   Filed Under: FeaturedGil Martin   PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE. __________________________ You can follow Gil Martin on Twitter @GilPackers __________________________ NFL Categories: Green Bay PackersTags: Green Bay PackersRich BisacciaBrian GutekunstBrandon McManusDaniel Whelan Like 0 points
05.02.2026 18:31 — 👍 3    🔁 1    💬 8    📌 2
Preview
Hello Wisconsin: Preparing for a 2025 Re-Do It has been nearly a month since the Green Bay Packers ended their season with another inexcusable collapse in Chicago, and it now appears clear that the team has no intent of making any real staffing changes heading into the 2026 season that they weren’t forced to do. In the immediate aftermath of the game, the internet was aflame with fans calling for coaches’ jobs. Even long-time media stalwarts with reputations for being level-headed like Bill Huber and Tom Silverstein penned pieces for their publications indicating that the Packers should fire Matt LaFleur.  This was different; while LaFleur had always had his share of vocal critics, they tended to be a loud and small minority. This time, though, that group of critics launched into the forefront and became larger than ever. This was the most heat the coach had ever felt, and it felt like the tide had turned.  Soon, though, it became clear that the Packers were not going to fire LaFleur. Considering some of the head coaching hires made by other teams since then that may have been a wise decision, but at the same time, nothing has really changed since the Packers last took the field. LaFleur is who he is, and there is a large enough sample size to produce some significant skepticism that he can be the man to lead the Packers to their 14th championship. So, okay. LaFleur is coming back. Those most critical of LaFleur forced themselves to accept that the combination of reasonable regular season success, his work with Jordan Love, the market for available coaches, and the team’s list of injuries this year made it difficult for the Packers brass to want to make a different decision. Fine, whatever. But, for those critics, for this decision to be more palatable, there had to be some coordinator changes made. And then the monkey’s paw curled. Gone is the one decent coordinator the Packers had, Jeff Hafley, to be a head coach in Miami after just his second season in the NFL. Gone go several assistants to his staff. Somehow, Rich Bisaccia retains his job after multiple years of continued terrible special teams play, a cycle that may not be entirely his fault given the team’s historical awfulness in this aspect of football, but a cycle that he also has done nothing to break. Somehow, Adam Stenovich, who assisted in presiding over a mercurial at best offense that gave Jordan Love little help at key moments throughout the season, who scoffed at suggestions Matthew Golden could or should be a key part of game plans in the playoffs, gets to keep his job as well.  The only changes made to the Packers’ staff of any real consequence are ultimately the ones the team was forced into changing. They really do intend to run it all back. Who knows, maybe the whole thing really can just be chalked up to bad injury luck. After all, losing players the caliber of Micah Parsons, Zach Tom, Elgton Jenkins, Devonte Wyatt, and Tucker Kraft (among others) is always going to be a major blow. But when you consider the way in which the team kept falling apart in the most crucial moments, it’s hard to come away feeling good about the coaching staff assembled for 2026. It’s hard to make the case that the team did anything to get better in that part of its football operation. We’ll see what Jonathan Gannon brings to the defense; he has to produce results at least as good as Hafley’s did. We’ll see what happens when these key guys get back. But I’m having a hard time feeling any sort of excitement about what the next season brings in store.  Maybe things will change in July when I’m desperate for the return of football. But for now… the idea of running it back has little appeal for me, and it feels as though the Packers are just kind of asleep at the wheel. Wisconsin Beer of the Week We’re in the thick of porter and stout season, so why not feature a porter today? This is a beer I’ve never had from a brewery I have little to no experience with. It’s Nov. ‘93 by Low Daily Brewery, which is based in the small town of Burlington (known for its chocolate factory and Tony Romo, among other things). It’s been quite a while since I have paid a visit to Burlington; I remember running in a track meet there in high school, and the track was situated close enough to the chocolate factory that it was all you could smell.  Anyway, it should be no surprise then that this porter features a bit of a chocolatey flavor, though technically it is a vanilla porter (brewed with Madagascar vanilla beans). As you’d expect from a beer of the style, it weighs in at a moderate 6-ish percent ABV. It’s smooth and a little sweet; not too heavy at all. It’s ideal for winter nights where you’re looking for that warming roasty flavor but not trying to fill yourself up.  This was my first Low Daily experience and I was impressed, so I’ll be on the lookout for some more of their stuff in the near future.  Super Bowl highlights teams that have quickly reinvented themselves It is probably a dramatic understatement to say it is really freakin’ hard to get to, let alone win, a Super Bowl. That’s one of the reasons why what the New England Patriots and Seattle Seahawks have accomplished this year is so impressive. Both of these teams were powerhouses to a degree in their own conferences during the last decade. Both of them fell off significantly by the start of this decade and had to go through some pretty significant identity shifts, changing coaches, quarterbacks, systems, entire rosters. What Eliot Wolf in New England and John Schneider in Seattle (both former Green Bay guys) have done is truly impressive. These are teams that were winners relatively recently and didn’t have to take too long to perform a rebuild and get right back to football prominence. For Schneider who has been there the whole time, it might be especially impressive, and reminiscent of what Howie Roseman managed to do with the Philadelphia Eagles after that 2017 Super Bowl championship and the team’s ensuing brief collapse and rapid transformation.  It’s also one of the reasons why it’s difficult to stomach what has happened with the Packers not just in LaFleur’s tenure, but over the last 15 seasons. The Packers simply have not managed to do what these teams have, at least yet. They haven’t been able to sufficiently reinvent themselves to the point where they’re not just sneaking into the playoffs, but kicking the doors in. They’ve not returned to the point where they’re expecting to be there rather than just happy to be there.  Between the Seahawks, the Patriots, the Eagles, and other teams like the Rams and 49ers, we’ve seen teams manage to go through these lulls and reboot relatively quickly in recent years to bring themselves back to Super Bowls.  We love the holiday season And by the holiday season, I mean Super Bowl weekend! I love the Super Bowl, and honestly I probably have more fun with the game when the Packers are not playing. For Super Bowl XLV I was so anxious that I couldn’t really eat or drink anything the whole day. For a number of years now we’ve hosted a Super Bowl gathering at my house and it’s always a good time. There’s chili, all kinds of snacks and dips and desserts, and of course, plenty of beverages of a wide assortment. Friends come with their kids, we’ve got a couple different TVs going, it’s a good time. This year I get to revive one of my favorite Super Bowl traditions: cheering for the New England Patriots. You see, during the height of the Patriots’ dynasties, my post-Packer elimination philosophy was simple: if I as a Packer fan don’t get to be happy, nobody else does. So what’s the outcome that will cause the most people to be upset? Obviously it’s the Patriots winning. Even the Patriots fans wouldn’t really enjoy it all that much themselves because they’d seen it so many times before. I’m not quite sure the Patriots winning will cause the same level of angst as it did in the Brady/Belichick years, but certainly there would be a more visceral response to a New England victory than a Seattle victory. And to me, this is exactly what I’m looking for.  I as a fan was denied a happy ending to the season. Now everybody else has to suffer as well. Sorry, that’s just the way it is. Anyway, I’m looking forward to watching the game (and commercials) with friends. Despite knowing nothing about Bad Bunny, I’m certainly looking forward to the performance as well for the sheer spectacle, though I’m not sure anything will ever beat Kendrick Lamar getting to perform a Drake diss track on live television in front of an audience of 125 million and looking straight into the camera to call him a pedophile with a big cheeky grin. That’s entertainment, folks. Around the NFC North As always, it’s time to go around the NFC North.  * The CHICAGO BEARS suck.   * The DETROIT LIONS apparently nearly had Quandre Diggs back in town this season, but he declined to sign with the team when they tried to bring him in off the Seahawks’ practice squad. Diggs has played a key role as a role player near the end of his career in helping Seattle to the Super Bowl; it’s interesting to consider how this could have changed things.    * The MINNESOTA VIKINGS canned their general manager Kwesi Adofo-Mensah in a bit of a surprise move shortly after the conference championship weekend. Perhaps seeing Sam Darnold lead the Seahawks to the Super Bowl as favorites was a bit too much for the Vikings–a reminder of the decision to allow him to leave in favor of JJ McCarthy, one of the league’s worst starters at the position who was widely panned as being a reach when the team drafted him in 2024. Adofo-Mensah was generally a poor drafter and presided over the team while what had been one of the league’s strongest rosters aged out with no real replacements while the team’s available cap space shrank significantly.  Mr. Backes’s “This or That” Every day I put a different “this or that” poll up on my whiteboard and have students leave tallies throughout the day. I then compile this information and post it here for laughs.  * Winter olympics defeated summer olympics * Wendy’s defeated McDonald’s * Oreos defeated Chips Ahoy * Apple juice defeated orange juice * Basketball defeated baseball Super Bowl Pick Okay, so we’ve made it. The final game of the NFL season before we head into the long dark of the offseason. I don’t know that there’s a soul alive that would have predicted this matchup before the season started, but I guess that’s why they play the games. It’s often easy to say of a couple ascending new teams that they could be right back here next year, but we all know that that’s not how this works; for one or both of these teams, this could be their only chance. So it’s going to be fun to see how this one plays out with these fresh-but-not-fresh faces. It's difficult for me to not pick the Seahawks. While I have generally tuned out any of the talk of the Patriots having benefited from an easy schedule (guess what, they still won all those games), I do not think they have been as efficient or as fearsome as this Seahawks team has been. While the Patriots have the capability of making it interesting, the Seahawks are far more well rounded and have been the closest thing the league has had this year to a juggernaut.  Ultimately, give me the Seahawks in a 30-20 game. An especially cool story for Sam Darnold, and a reminder to never judge a player too harshly for flaming out with the Jets. They’re an irredeemable dumpster fire. Seattle Seahawks 30, New England Patriots 20   Filed Under: FeaturedTim BackesHello Wisconsin   PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE. __________________________ Tim Backes is a lifelong Packer fan and a contributor to CheeseheadTV. Follow him on Twitter @timbackes for his Packer takes, random musings and Untappd beer check-ins. __________________________ Tags: Seattle Seahawksnew england patriotsSuper Bowl LXMr. Backes's This or ThatWisconsin Beer of the WeekMatt LaFleurRich BisacciaJeff HafleyAdam StenovichNFL picks Like 0 points
05.02.2026 12:49 — 👍 7    🔁 1    💬 2    📌 0
Pack-A-Day Podcast - Episode 2751 - Key Takeaways From Brian Gutekunst's Press Conference! Join Andy Herman for his full recap and key takeaways from Brian Gutekunst's end of season press conference. Don't miss it!     Filed Under: Pack A Day Podcast   PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE. __________________________ Andy is a graduate of UW-Oshkosh and owns & operates the Pack-A-Day Podcast. Andy has taken multiple courses in NFL scouting and is an Editor for Packer Report. Andy grew up in Green Bay and is a lifelong season ticket holder - follow him on Twitter @AndyHermanNFL! __________________________ NFL Categories: Green Bay PackersTags: Pack-A-Day PodcastPackers podcastPacker PodcastGreen Bay Packers podcastgreen bay packer Like 0 points
05.02.2026 11:28 — 👍 4    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0
Preview
Ranking Legends: Should the PF Hall of Fame be Redefined? As fans of the Green Bay Packers, we all know that the franchise has a much higher standard of success than most other teams in the league. Where other teams hang stadium banners for division championships, the Packers only recognize world championships. The standard for success is a much higher hill to climb in the land they call "Title Town," and the same standards apply to honored players.  When you look at the list of players who have their numbers retired around the league and then compare some of those players to the players the Packers have numbers retired for, there's a big difference. Without naming names, some of these players' careers are equal to those that the Packers likely wouldn't award the honor. That's not to say they're undeserving, but it again shows the standard of the Packers vs the rest of the league.  The greatest quarterback for one franchise may be leagues above another franchise in terms of career stats and success. Not all franchise honors are equal. But when it comes time for enshrinement in the Pro Football Hall of Fame, they are all inducted equally. But it begs the question, should they be? At first, it seems silly to think about it. If a player, coach, or contributor had a Hall of Fame career, they get in; that's it. But then you look at the varying careers and the players who just barely made the cut alongside some of the best to ever do it. Not to mention, those who are seemingly snubbed due to the lack of a Super Bowl ring, or those who seem to make it in because they have a ring.  Let's take two examples from the same era. Peyton Manning and Kurt Warner. Peyton Manning is arguably a top 5 quarterback of all time. Kurt Warner was an underdog turned Hall of Famer. Both are good quarterbacks, but when you compare the two, there's no doubt that Peyton Manning eclipses Warner in every facet. But both of their Hall of Fame busts sit in the same room, with no difference between the two.  Should there be a difference between Hall of Famers? Ranking the Greats There's always been a particular honor bestowed on some of the best to do it, and that is making them a unanimous, surefire first-ballot Hall of Famer in their first year of eligibility. But as we've recently seen with the Bill Belichick first-ballot snub, and possibly a rumor of a Tom Brady first-ballot snub down the line, this honor can be tainted. What if there were ranks amongst those in the hall of fame?  This consideration would be granted based on career accolades. You have your Hall of Famers and your unanimous Hall of Famers. The legends among legends. There is no doubt, they belong in the hall right away as the absolute best of the best, and then those after.  The Green Bay Packers Hall of Fame has around seven quarterbacks. Three of those have been inducted into the Pro Football Hall of Fame. Consider the entire Pro Football Hall of Fame to be like the Packers hall of Fame. Those players may be some of the best the Packers have ever seen, but are they the best the NFL has seen? Then take even those players and choose who are some of the best the Hall of Fame has ever seen?  When you look at what you don't want the Pro Football Hall of Fame to become, look no further than the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame. For many years, the Rock Hall has been deemed broken. You have industry executives holding grudges and making sure deserving bands or singers don't make it in, regardless of accolades. We don't have that yet in terms of players/coaches getting into the hall altogether, but it seems that we have that situation when it comes to granting them a "best of the best" honor. And that's why perhaps that type of honor needs some retooling.  Of course, part of the beauty of the Hall of Fame is that once you're in, you're an equal part of the family forever. But whether you're deemed the best of the best when you enter shouldn't be up for some writers or former league executives to decide. They simply decide whether or not you get in, and then once you're in, you're placed amongst the best of the hall based on your career.  If we're going to have an honor for the best amongst even the hall of famers, it should be earned during the career that is being honored, not the ballot of a possible grudge holder.    Filed Under: FeaturedGreg Meinholz PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE. __________________________ Greg Meinholz is a lifelong devoted Packer fan. A contributor to CheeseheadTV as well as PackersTalk. Follow him on Twitter @gmeinholz and Bluesky @gmeinholz.bsky.social for Packers commentary, random humor, beer endorsements, and occasional Star Wars and Marvel ramblings. __________________________ NFL Categories: Green Bay PackersTags: Green Bay PackersPro Football Hall of FameReggie WhiteTom BradyBill Belichick Like 0 points
04.02.2026 20:28 — 👍 9    🔁 2    💬 0    📌 1
Preview
Packers Daily: Brian Gutekunst Ready To Stay The Course Filed Under: Aaron Nagler#PackersDailyPacker Fan Podcasts   PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE. __________________________ Tags: Green Bay PackersPackers Daily Like 0 points
04.02.2026 20:10 — 👍 6    🔁 1    💬 0    📌 0
Preview
Can The Packers Afford More Change Along The Offensive Line? Last week, I wrote about the extensive needs the Packers are facing all along the offensive line. To make a long story short: the Packers are facing needs at tackle, guard, and center. I ended that article with the conclusion that relying on the status quo along the offensive line could prove disastrous, that the Packers should seek active investment into the long-term health of the offensive line.  I’m here today to pass along the bad news that, as far as the 2026 season goes, there is little a new player could do to actively crack the starting lineup. Meaning, the team may be forced to retain a majority of the status quo.  I’d be remiss to not point out that, between the week one starters of 2025 and the likely week one starters of 2026, there is a changeover. The offensive line’s disastrous start will not be replicated, at least by the same players. There will be at least three new starters along the offensive line, and maybe even four!  Elgton Jenkins is all but guaranteed to be cut in order to free up $20 million dollars of badly needed cap space. He’ll be looking for a new team in the coming months, and will be joined by Rasheed Walker. He had the chance to convince the Packers to retain him, despite having already drafted his successor in Jordan Morgan. But don’t worry, even with the disappointing contract year in Green Bay, PFF estimates his next contract to fall along the range of four years, $84 million dollars. Goes to show how desperate teams around the league are for offensive linemen (and how Green Bay cannot afford to get that desperate). Next up is Sean Rhayn, also slated for free agency in the near future. He could be back in Green Bay, but it’d be at center instead of right tackle, where he started the 2025 season. I do think the Packers will find a way to make it work with Rhyan, with say, a two year contract extension.  So we have a new starter at left tackle (Jordan Morgan), right guard (Anthony Belton), and center (Sean Rhayn?). The possible fourth comes at left guard, where there isn’t a clear succession plan but lots of cap space to be freed up from a potential Aaron Banks release. The team would be re-couping around $4 million dollars of cap space in 2026, but $17 million dollars in 2027 as well. That’s certainly tempting, but the team will have to convince themselves that they have a clear path to a successor.  Right tackle Zach Tom is the only starter who is slated to be back at the same position in 2026, but guess what? There’s no real guarantee that he’ll be back for the start of that season. Tom underwent a surgical repair of a partially torn patellar tendon in his knee, which typically carries a six month recovery. That could mean that Tom could return for the 2026 training camp, but that is a particularly nasty injury for offensive linemen. For reference, if you are sitting down, put a finger on the underside of your knee and press up. That’s your patellar tendon. Yup, it’s not a great feeling to imagine tearing that.Tom has proved his toughness, but his availability for the season opener should be in question until we receive further news.  So, the Packers are facing the possibility of three to five offensive line spots seeing some form of reshuffle when week one rolls around. Whichever scenario the Packers end up falling into, they will have some unfortunate ramifications to deal with, but for (mostly) different reasons.  If the Packers are facing the “three new starters” possibility, it means that they are almost certainly going to be unable to get new players into the starting lineup. This is the most likely scenario, and I’m afraid that it is going to drive Packers fans (and writers!) crazy.  In this scenario, the Packers are likely seeing a lineup of Morgan-Banks-Rhyan-Belton-Tom. That’s awfully close to the same lineup we saw at the end of 2025. Did that lineup look better than the one the Packers started the season with? Yes, but it was still nowhere near where a championship-level offensive line should be performing at. And as I mentioned, that new lineup is mostly already locked in.  Morgan has been the heir apparent at LT for years, so the odds of someone beating him out for that job are extremely slim. Belton is by far the best option the Packers have at right guard, and just spent a second round pick on him! Center is probably the best possibility to see some new blood, but as I mentioned, I think the Packers would prefer to just bring Rhyan back. Could the Packers draft a center, and see that center beat out Rhyan for the job? Maybe. It does seem like MLF is very set on giving rookies as much of a landing strip into the NFL as he can though, and a rookie would have a hard time getting onto the field right away.  The Packers could sign a free agent, but this scenario see very little cap space room for the team to operate with in 2025, and certainly not enough to sign a top of class free agent like Tyler Linderbaum. And if it’s not a top of class guy who offers an instant upgrade, I don’t think it’s unreasonable to just bring Rhyan back, when the contracts would be similar.  So, there’s little to no room for any new Packers to actually see the field in 2025 in this scenario. On the other hand, if the Packers are seeing four or five reshuffled or new starters along the line in week one, we’ve probably got an entirely different problem.  This would mean no Aaron Banks, but as I mentioned Green Bay only sees around $4 million dollars of cap relief in 2026. Not enough to really try to sign another replacement straight up. The Packers could try to leverage that additional $17 million of space in 2027 into a contract or two, which is the likely move in this scenario. Or it means trying to find a true plug-and-play option in the second round of the draft, but you're just robbing Peter to pay Paul at that point. You’d still have massive holes at cornerback, and defensive tackle. You also don’t want to rope yourself into having to take a guard at that spot, instead of taking the best player available.  And then there is the nightmare scenario of having all five spots being newly occupied. If Zach Tom is unavailable, I struggle to come up with who the starter will be. Maybe the Packers have retained Darian Kinnard, whose contract also expires this year. If they haven’t, are we looking at starting tackle Travis Glover? I think everyone is tired of the rotating OL experiment, so I’d certainly prefer to keep Belton at guard. Rhyan is at center now, and was never a tackle anyway. Would we be looking at another rookie on the line? This scenario leaves us with Morgan (never played left tackle in a consistent role in the NFL) - Rookie / Small contract free agent - Rhyan / Rookie - Belton - Glover / Rookie / Kinnard.  That would keep me up at night.  Like I mentioned, the scenario that sees three reshuffled offensive linemen is by far the most likely, and is ultimately the best case scenario. In this timeline, we are going to have to just accept that the actual starting lineup is mostly set (barring injuries, of course), while the Packers have (hopefully) added a few rookies that can impact the lineup in 2027. The team might just be in no man’s land when it comes to improving the offensive line for 2026.  That’s not to say that the offensive can’t get better in 2026 than they were in 2027. Coaching certainly goes a long way towards that cause, as does injury luck. Does Sean Rhyan take a jump in play, after spending an entire offseason practicing at center? Does Jordan Morgan prove he should have taken over at LT long ago? Anthony Belton certainly got better as the season went on, and was already playing as well as could be reasonably hoped for. There’s no reason to think he can’t settle in at right guard for the long term.  Internal development might be the only path forward, for immediate results in 2026. I look forward to finding out a few of these answers over the coming weeks and months, especially in regards to the futures of Sean Rhayn and Aaron Banks. The Packers will certainly need a huge step forward from the entire group in order to get this team back into the Super Bowl.   Filed Under: FeaturedKalani Jones PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE. __________________________ Co-Owner of the thirteen time world champion Green Bay Packers. Sometimes I write about them. Follow me on Twitter at https://x.com/kjones_in_co and on Substack for film breakdowns! __________________________   NFL Categories: Green Bay PackersTags: Green Bay PackersNFLZach TomOffensive LinePackers offseason Like 0 points
04.02.2026 16:25 — 👍 8    🔁 1    💬 0    📌 0
Preview
Which Day 3 QB Could the Packers Steal in the 2026 Draft? Filed Under: NFL DraftNewt WestenPacker Fan Podcasts   PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE. __________________________ Tags: Green Bay PackersNFL DraftSenior Bowl Like 0 points
04.02.2026 16:16 — 👍 3    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

@cheeseheadtv is following 15 prominent accounts