Richard Watson

Signal’s marketing team must be loving this. “Don’t use WhatsApp to communicate your war plans. Only Signal Will Do (tm)”

I’m not great at cooking, partly because I get annoyed hunting ingredients down for recipes. Yesterday I gave chatgpt some rough advice (fast, Mediterranean, something a 6 year old would enjoy) and ingredients of what we have in the kitchen. I’m amazed at how well it did. That’s my new trick.

The real catalyst for this was a chat with a friend. We shared a few tips and he reminded me of the value of the first hour of the day. Exercise, meditate, anything that actually adds value. This in comparison to the usual suspects who work to destroy your focus.

I set it 5am to 4pm just for the day and had the best day in a while. I then scheduled it to do the same thing every weekday. I've left Audible on, so when I'm e.g. shopping or making lunch that's my only vice, and it's far more beneficial than frequent podcasts or being horrified by politicians.

I'm a bit too online. I reach for my phone first thing and usually check in news, etc. I check in a bunch of times a day, across various apps/sites. But right now I need to focus. About a year ago I installed an app that blocks ~everything, but haven't used it much. Last Friday I turned it on.

Yes but Zelenskyy didn’t pretend to investigate Biden when asked. Trump can’t see past that. He’d trash democracy itself if it meant another glitzy hotel.

Zelensky is a wartime leader watching his people suffer and die under Russian attacks every day. To be lectured and lied to by Trump and Vance, as they defend the war criminal dictator committing these atrocities, is unimaginable agony. An everlasting shame for America.

Zelensky is a hero by any sensible measure. A leader inspiring his nation in the midst of an invasion by a powerful, repressive dictatorship. The fact that any American can think of him as the bad guy just demonstrates the triumph of tribalism over principle.

Given their background and the task, they must have absolutely eaten up the task of training models and generating tokens faster and more efficiently. That's why they keep throwing out amazing repositories with infrastructural improvements. github.com/deepseek-ai

Deepseek is essentially a story about high-frequency trading (HFT) engineers being set on a new problem. HFT is all about extreme high performance. They care about nanoseconds, not milliseconds, and they crawl over every aspect of the tech. They train models to inform trades, not generate tokens.

Gravel mountain biking track winding in S-curves across the image, with bush all around and a dam in the top middle distance.

Fun little stretch of the Manly Dam mountain biking track

Air quality map of Africa and Europe, showing worst air above desert areas, blowing out to the West of the Sahara.

Being a new-ish transplant to Sydney, I assumed sea air was obviously better than inland, city air. One map surprised me, and if you scroll around you'll definitely be surprised at some of the world hotspots. Note e.g. Oman and everything to the West of it.

www.accuweather.com/en/au/sydney...

Sun rising over Freshwater beach, with people entering the water bottom right.

Sunrise WNOW crew at Freshie. Join a local chapter! Community, exercise, support, coffee.

The AI chat interface is like the command line. It's powerful but it relies on the user exploring the space before they become competent. Many users just want boxes and buttons to click, where options are presented clearly and they can stay focused on their task.

I had a JSON array to insert into BigQuery. Not some big IQ task, just add the data. O3 gave me all sorts of stupid advice, arguing around what an unchecked checkbox meant in the BigQuery UI, telling me I was using a legacy sql dialect etc. Claude just gave me the script in one shot.

I find OpenAI's "smarter" models become more and more sure that they're right (when they're definitely wrong) and it can take real, repeated effort to convince them otherwise. I think the reasoning aspect reduces how directly your input is applied.

I predict the Trump Moscow Glamorzone Palace Hotel will receive heavy local subsidies and no red tape problems. The U.S. and Russian oligarchies will form a single union and oil and gold will all be paid for in TrumPutins -the new digital reserve currency.

TV journalists and podcasters: pronounce Doge as Dodgy from now on.

And that's obviously a generalisation, because some needs might never grow. E.g. any good AI can improve badly-written instructions for cheap toys, and you'll never need a super intelligent agent copywriter.

Very often, average is good enough. Especially in areas where moving fast is more important than perfect. Get a rough solution in place, iterate as needed. At some point, we'll all need experts in design/marketing/code etc, or hope that the models and AI tooling stay ahead of our needs.

There seems to be a strong feeling among basically all roles, that AI helps with things they don't know well but looks suboptimal in areas they do. E.g. copywriting, writing, strategy, code, whatever. You can get "average" output easily, but the tail is long and winding.

You’d better be absolutely bulletproof if you try that. Never mind a bit distasteful. You should be able to see competitors at an event and say hi. One day you might be colleagues. Why make them hate you?

Obviously a red riding hooded chicken with a microphone

Obviously check the sources and eventually speak to a human, but it’s not a bad start rather than reading only whatever you find on Google’s first page.

I’ve recently tried using them as proxies for profiles. I try to trigger the LLM to think like persona X, discover needs. With and without the “search” button as grounding. My thinking is the model has read many opinions from those users. “Search” pulls together a few sources, but can be too narrow

I use Claude a lot to generate versions of UI’s to see if there are other ways of doing something. Sometimes I give more detail to test out a concept. Other times I give little, to break out of my narrow funnel.

It triggered me to learn the sax at school. Loved that movie.

The right people were there, discussing things that needed them to be there. Information was shared beforehand rather than at the meeting. The outcome was worth more than everyone’s time. Multiple people spoke, not just the loudest. Minds were changed. Stuff that could be moved offline, was. Coffee.

Last company, we built a ton of experimentation that gave us excellent info on the true value of many initiatives. We could prove what something was worth, down to an individual nudge. (With enough data.) Also negative value, in some cases. “Data > opinion” was the mantra.

Other examples: DNS goes down. What does that cost you? That’s the value of a reliable DNS provider for your service. Maybe $0, maybe $10k per hour.