Jane Baker's Avatar

Jane Baker

@janebaker52.bsky.social

Freedom to all, not the few.

183 Followers  |  123 Following  |  1,131 Posts  |  Joined: 01.02.2025  |  2.27

Latest posts by janebaker52.bsky.social on Bluesky

πŸ’―πŸ‘

25.09.2025 02:01 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I heard there are suspicions of a rare earth deal. Plus Trump likes other fascists.

25.09.2025 02:00 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

πŸ‘

25.09.2025 01:57 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Write hm a letter and show far you get.

21.09.2025 02:47 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

He’s a dictator dismantling our democracy. It’s almost textbook, step by step.

21.09.2025 02:43 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Disgusting. Instead of an instinct to help someone in desperate need his answer is to kill the?

13.09.2025 19:51 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Justice Sonia Sotomayor's dissent highlights concerns about the potential for abuse, stating that the decision "makes a mockery of the principle….that no man is above the law

07.09.2025 14:56 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

It's essential to note that the Supreme Court's decision has sparked controversy, with some arguing it sets a dangerous precedent for presidential power.

07.09.2025 14:56 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Congressional Action: Congress could attempt to pass legislation that clarifies or limits presidential immunity.

- Future Cases: Other cases involving presidential immunity may arise, potentially leading to further Supreme Court review or clarification.

07.09.2025 14:55 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

β€’ Possible Challenges:
- Lower Court Interpretations: The district court will need to determine which actions are considered official and which are unofficial. This could lead to further appeals and potential Supreme Court review.

07.09.2025 14:54 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

The Supreme Court's decision sends the case back to a federal district trial court to reconsider its charges against Trump and distinguish between his alleged official and unofficial actions.

07.09.2025 14:52 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

court to reconsider its charges against Trump and distinguish between his alleged official and unofficial actions.

β€’ Challenging the Ruling: To challenge this decision, lower courts will need to interpret and apply the ruling to specific cases.

07.09.2025 14:50 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

β€’ Challenging the Ruling: To challenge this decision, lower courts will need to interpret and apply the ruling to specific cases. The Supreme Court's decision sends the case back to a federal district trial

07.09.2025 14:49 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

β€’ The Ruling: The Supreme Court decided that a former president has criminal immunity for some official actions taken while in office, with absolute immunity for core constitutional powers and presumptive immunity for other official acts.

07.09.2025 14:48 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I asked Meta AI this question;

Can the Supreme Court ruling that gives Trump complete immunity while president be challenged?

Meta’s answer (see comments for total response)

The Supreme Court ruling on Trump's immunity can be challenged, but the process is complex. Here's a breakdown:

07.09.2025 14:46 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 8    πŸ“Œ 0

πŸ–•πŸΌ

06.09.2025 21:26 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

πŸ–•πŸΌ

06.09.2025 21:20 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

πŸ’―

04.09.2025 01:29 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Trump losing in court is only a win if he decides to listen or just come up with another previously untried way to accomplish what was earlier charged as illegal.

03.09.2025 22:54 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image 25.08.2025 18:00 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

And so many did not listen. Wonder how they’re feeling now?

25.08.2025 17:43 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

It is common when your government is an authoritarian regime, otherwise it is not.

24.08.2025 17:45 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

πŸ€©πŸ€©πŸ‘

24.08.2025 15:20 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

🀣

24.08.2025 03:12 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

The reason they don’t wear masks is clearly because they don’t want to be identified. Is it shame of being discovered they’re doing the work of a fascist or is it possibly because they are known fascist white nationalists?

23.08.2025 15:42 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Because there are witnesses? Because she was tried in the court of law and found guilty?

23.08.2025 15:34 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Is someone filing a lawsuit challenging this. Extortion?

23.08.2025 13:39 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Corruption in plain sight

23.08.2025 13:29 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

πŸ™ŒπŸ‘πŸ’―

21.08.2025 22:22 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

You look great for your age! Happy birthday 🎁

19.08.2025 14:20 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

@janebaker52 is following 15 prominent accounts