4. AI Search Ranking Fluctuations
If you've noticed your AI search visibility bouncing around, this explains what's actually happening and what you can do about it.
Link: knowatoa.com/guides/ai_se...
@buckbee.bsky.social
Dev+Founder+Dad -> Wafris, SendCheckIt, Knowatoa, ExpeditedWAF. Mostly post about cybersecurity and AI SEO stuff. Discover how your brand ranks in ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini at knowatoa.com/bsky
4. AI Search Ranking Fluctuations
If you've noticed your AI search visibility bouncing around, this explains what's actually happening and what you can do about it.
Link: knowatoa.com/guides/ai_se...
3. The B.I.S.C.U.I.T. Framework
Our comprehensive approach to AI search optimization. If you only read one thing, make it this.
Link: knowatoa.com/guides/biscu...
2. The Myth of AI Search Unoptimizability
I keep hearing from folks that "you can't optimize for AI search." ...which is just weird so here's some more of my thoughts on why we keep talking past one another.
Link: knowatoa.com/guides/ai_se...
1. The AI Search Optimization Loop
This is the practical framework for how to actually improve your AI search visibility. No magic, a repeatable process.
knowatoa.com/guides/ai_se...
We just reorganized our Guides to modern search (with AI) to better surface the advice that we keep putting out into the world.
And while there's a lot on that page, I've handpicked four that I think are particularly useful for folks working in search marketing right now:
Waiting to see what happens is a valid approach, but I think it's crucial to understand that you could still be held responsible.
Link: techcrunch.com/2026/01/07/g...
- These services are only going to get more popular
If you're using chatbots or AI assistants that talk to your customers, you really need to be aware of this. Courts are writing the legal rules for AI liability right now, case by case.
Character.AI settle first major chatbot liability cases. Details are really scant, so I don't think I can responsibly say whether it's good or bad, but it's clear that:
- Personality based AI chatbots are incredibly persuasive
- This is a massive responsibility for Google to manage
trajectory where it's not directly a search engine, but millions of people spend hours a day interacting with it, asking it questions and from that Google (who owns it now) has this massive channel for incredibly targeted advertising.
With that in mind, it's interesting to see Google and-
potentially really important new visibility channel.
There's a long standing joke in the SEO world about how YouTube is the second largest "search engine" after Google, though most people don't really think of it that way.
I'm honestly wondering if Character.AI is going to see a similar-
Character.AI remains one of my big AI blindspots where it's both immensely popular and just sort of personally offputting.
But the more I hesitantly look at it (and ask Steve Harrington questions about how life is in Hawkins after Vecna has been defeated), the more I've come to view it as a-
As both a developer and marketing person I'm personally seeing many friends with things like software development courses, tutorials and websites also actutely feeling this same pain.
Link: github.com/tailwindlabs...
answers to their questions in tools like ChatGPT, Claude or Google's AI Overviews, greatly decreasing their docs traffic ("search migration").
- Developers are increasingly using tools that just directly solve these problems, reducing demand for their paid products ("search evaporation").
style text inputs with Tailwind"
4. Tailwind's awesome and incredibly helpful docs site dominates these searches.
5. Developers visit the docs site and get both help, but also exposed to buying their paid products
However, with the rise of AI they're being cut in two ways:
- People are getting-
impact of AI search.
This week however Tailwind (a much beloved CSS framework) announced layoffs of 75% of their staff as a direct result of AI search disruption.
Their business model has been:
1. Developers try and use Tailwind
2. They run into issues
3. They search for solutions like "how do-
major case study for the impact of AI search on traditional search has been StackOverflow, which seen a 78% decline in questions asked over the past year.
However, StackOverflow has simultaneously been dying of self inflicted wounds for a long time, so it been a shaky indicator of the broader-
While lots of marketing people continue to argue on LinkedIn about whether or not AI search is real, we're starting to see some of the grim reality of it.
It's clear that different industries are adopting AI at different rates, but far and way AI has taken over software development. To date the-
attention. It's whether you'll be visible when it matters.
16.01.2026 18:16 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0And if you're skeptical about optimization, here's our take on the unoptimizability myth:
knowatoa.com/guides/ai_se...
The practical upshot: don't wait for AI search to "arrive." It's already here, filtering your existing search traffic through AI layers. The question isn't whether to pay-
You're influencing what the next model update will say about your brand.
We've written extensively about both of these topics. If you want the full argument on why AI search volume is just search volume, read our guide here:
knowatoa.com/guides/searc...
models as static files you download once. But that's not how anyone actually uses AI.
ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity all update constantly. The model, the system prompts, the web search tools. All of it changes more frequently than you'd expect.
And fair, you're not optimizing for a frozen snapshot.
with Google.
Your existing search volume isn't sitting safely in some "traditional search" bucket. It's already being served through AI interfacesβ¦that happen to be Google's.
The other argument I hear is that AI search "can't be optimized for." This usually comes from folks thinking about AI-
that blend research with advice.
And even if none of that was true and Sam Altman turned off the OpenAI servers tomorrow, you have to look at what Google is doing.
Google has made the decision that every search is now "AI Search".
AI Overviews, AI Mode, and Gemini are what search is right now-
every month. That's roughly 10% of all adults worldwide.
51% of AI usage is search-like tasks: seeking information, getting practical guidance, making decisions.
AI use is sticky. The longer someone uses these tools, the more they use them.
People use AI for higher-value searches: complex decisions-
I keep seeing articles arguing that AI search "hasn't arrived yet" or that it's some small, separate thing you can ignore.
I understand where this comes from, but I think it fundamentally misreads what's happening.
This isn't me arguing, but just look at the data:
750 million people use ChatGPT-
is that the models powering these systems just got significantly better at reasoning. I think this matters a lot for how AI search engines gather information and which sources they choose to cite.
Link: simonwillison.net/2026/Jan/8/l...
analysis is his healthy skepticism. He isn't out there saying AI will do absolutely everything. Instead, he points out specific ability levels that AI has now reached. Then, he thoughtfully considers what those practical changes actually mean.
For those of us watching AI search, the main takeaway-
sandboxing problems for AI agents. On the cautionary side, he warns about possible security problems as coding agents gain more control. Whether AI will create more or fewer software engineering jobs remains an open question for him, the classic Jevons Paradox.
What I really like about Willison's-
Simon Willison, someone I look to for practical LLM expertise, shared his 2026 predictions this week. He believes we hit a real turning point in November 2025 with GPT-5.2 and Claude Opus 4.5.
He predicts that LLM code quality will become "undeniable" in the next year, and that we'll solve-