looking forward to this, i missed you when you moved from sunday mornings to evenings

Which is just what you do, isnt it?
State something as a fact with no knowledge at all

Imagine being the kind of parent who brings their kids up saying you can pick and choose what laws you follow
Stealing?
Drink driving?
Assault?
Don't worry kid, daddy will argue that it was okay because you didnt agree with those laws

Do you have any evidence, or, lore to the point, did PA, have any evidence it was going to be used for that purpose?

If he was a german, and i was a german, in Germany, a terrorist

My understanding is that the factory made drones, some for use in war zones, some not
What disgusts me about people like you is that you take the moral high ground while denigrating a whole group of people for where they work
You think it okay for them to be terrorised for working in a drone factory

As often as you like
Did they want all women to vote, or just gave up when well off women got the vote?
Please explain how you can be sure they would not have achieved it with peaceful protest?
Or that the war made no difference?

You have no idea what the equipment would be used for, nor any right to decide damaging it is a good or bad thing
Suppose it was going to be used to protect Ukraine?
You probably feel like they should just have accepted Russian rule rather than fight?

No, i was just busy with other people
I have made my point of view very clear, I dislike people picking and choosing which laws they obey
I find it astonishing that so many people believe that disagreeing with the government gives them a right to break the law

It is your opinion, but i console myself with knowing I dont support terrorism

I would be unhappy with any govt aiding war crimes, but it would not affect my opinion of people who choose to break the law
Please come back when you know the government has been convicted of such

An interesting argument, what would you have called someone who deliberately damaged the landing craft or spitfires before that?
Peaceful protesters?

No, i have tried to steer away from the moral argument, because morality is never cut and dried, it is much more about perception

Apparently not, but, on that basis, throwing fireworks and smoke bombs at people fleeing a building would surely count, dont you agree?
Wouldn't you find that a little terrifying?

Please explain how they brought about parity over voting 11 years after they disbanded?
Please also explain how you can be sure that peaceful protest would not have achieved it earlier?

I dont know, did the government tell the people that's what they were?
Would it have been okay if the german people had been aware but thought it was okay anyway?

Fatuous
Yes, i think stabbing people is wrong
I would be concerned at any surgeon stabbing patients rather than carefully slicing them open
You aren't a surgeon, are you?

Probably not, my understanding is that he is working outside the law and constitution

Thanks, I wasnt aware i needed advice, especially from someone who doesnt have a pic

Then we agree, so what is your problem with my posts?
The government didnt proscribe PA, parliament did
There was little opposition to the motion, not even the libdems

It was criminal
This is not a discussion about morals, as much as you would like it to be
But clearly yes, it was immoral, by any definition you like

I get you now, indiscriminately throwing fireworks is okay in your book, and is in no way a violent act
The sheriff disagreed, of course, but he was probably biased anyway?

We are not discussing morals, we are discussing law

Again, read the full extent of what they did
Had I been a worker at the Glasgow factory being faced with smoke bombs and fireworks and then finding machinery broken i think I would have found it difficult to go back the following day
I guess you would have been okay

No, straw argued that if they committed terrorist acts in this country they would be covered

You deflect, and that is a totally different argument
The government did not proscribed PA, Parliament did, there was little or no opposition to it
Has the government been found guilty yet?

I totally agree with straw, we maintain the right to peaceful protest
However, supporting a terrorist organisation is not a peaceful protest it is a criminal act, for which people were arrested
For which they will probably get fined and be proud of, until they have to declare if for a DBS check

Two points
One, they didnt say they were doing it on behalf of the quaker movement, unlike the people who damaged aircraft
Two, the report makes it clear they were found not guilty

Not sure why you think that's relevant?

They through pyrotechnics and smoke bombs int an area where workers at a Glasgow factory were being evacuated
The sheriff that convicted them said that could hardly be described as non violent
I guess you disagree