I’ve worked nearly 5 years as a sustainability consultant.
One thing I’ve noticed?
Almost no one talks about how much energy lab equipment consumes.
> A single institute can use enough electricity to power a small village.
Let’s raise awareness.
Let’s do better.
01.08.2025 10:13 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Of course, these vary depending on model + usage.
But even as rough averages, they’re eye-opening.
Big thanks to @MyGreenLab and @Eppendorf for pushing transparency on this!
#ACTLabel #LabEnergy
01.08.2025 10:13 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
And the heavy hitters:
🌫️ Fume Hood: 20–35 kWh
⚛️ MS: 15–20
💧 HPLC: 5–15
🔥 GC-MS: 20–50
🥶 Freezer: 5–20 (old ones: >35!)
01.08.2025 10:13 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
If you care about sustainability, these numbers you need to know - let's make it super quick:
These numbers are hard to come by but:
Centrifuge: 4.2 kWh
Incubator: 0.04–0.9
PCR Cycler: 0.2–2
Thermomixer: 0.11
E-pipette: 0.01–0.05
#GreenLab #STEM #Sustainability
01.08.2025 10:13 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
The wild part?
In cases where the AI and authors disagreed, human judges sided more often with the AI.
We may be witnessing the next evolution of science.
Soon, we won’t know if a review was written by humans or AI.
Are we ready for that?
#AI #ScientificPublishing #STEM
29.07.2025 10:02 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
A Cochrane review usually takes 2–3 researchers up to 365 days.
The AI did it in under 48 hours — with similar conclusions.
🔹 GPT-4.1 screens titles & abstracts
🔹 Gemini turns PDFs into structured Markdown
🔹 o3-mini-high extracts outcome data
→ Meta-analysis is then run
29.07.2025 10:02 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
It finally happened.
AI can now write systematic reviews better than humans.
And it only takes 2 days...
A group of researchers (Cao et al.) built a workflow using freely available AI tools to:
🔹 Screen papers
🔹 Extract data
🔹 Run meta-analyses
All without any hefty coding.
29.07.2025 10:02 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
This project concludes in August. I’ve spent 10 out of 14 days so far. Results to come!
Sustainability is possible, even with limited time and small investments. 🌍
Wish me luck! 🍀
24.07.2025 08:57 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
So far, we’ve identified 30+ ways to be more sustainable without changing workflows.
The best part?
I’ve made incredible connections. The team is creative and constantly surprises me with new ideas to make experiments greener. 💡
24.07.2025 08:57 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
The plan:
Get to know the institute, people, and culture
Work one-on-one with scientists on their workflows
Share solutions and drive culture change
= All in two weeks
24.07.2025 08:57 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
A few weeks ago, a former professor reached out from a research institute with 350+ scientists.
Asking for help making their research more sustainable. 🌱
24.07.2025 08:57 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
Making a research institute more sustainable in just 2 weeks?
The Leibniz-HKI and I took on the challenge... 🧵👇
The goal wasn’t just clean energy, but also less plastic in experiments, reducing chemical waste, and improving health & safety.
#STEM #Greenlab @leibniz-hki.de
24.07.2025 08:57 — 👍 4 🔁 2 💬 1 📌 0
And yes—even in papers, you start with the abstract.
Why?
Because readers want to know if it's worth reading—before they commit.
Your audience is no different.
#SciComm #PhDLife #STEM #Storytelling #ScienceCommunication
22.07.2025 08:15 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Instead of asking:
“How do I introduce my topic?”
Ask:
“What grabs my viewer right now?”
“What’s the most shocking part of this story?”
Then start there.
22.07.2025 08:15 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
If you want to hook people, don’t introduce.
Grab them.
Surprise them.
Make them feel something they can’t scroll past.
22.07.2025 08:15 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
Most scientists start their SciComm like they start a paper:
"Today I'm going to talk about..."
Big mistake.
Nobody has time to be well informed—until they know it's relevant.
22.07.2025 08:15 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
🎬 Do science communication like making a great movie.
Start mid-action. No foreplay.
Here’s how I got millions of views (and 600+ newsletter readers in 3 weeks) by doing what most scientists don’t:
22.07.2025 08:15 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
PCR doesn't have to be slow, expensive, or wasteful.
Small changes = big impact.
#PCR #LabTips #PhDLife #GreenLab #ScienceTwitter
03.07.2025 12:43 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
🧪 Pipetting tip:
Always prep a master mix. It saves time AND plastic.
Also, use the same tip to prep and distribute the mix.
📉 Working with replicates?
Mix water + DNA once, then aliquot. Don’t pipette into each tube separately.
→ Saves tips
→ more consistent DNA concentrations
03.07.2025 12:43 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
💡 Sustainability tip:
Raise your holding temp from 4 °C → 12–16 °C
Eppendorf found this saves 30–45% energy depending on the thermocycler.
03.07.2025 12:43 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
Pedlar et al. shortened cycle times significantly:
• 5s denaturation (vs. 30s)
• 25s annealing (vs. 60s)
• 25s extension (vs. 60s)
🔬 Result:
– 46% faster (1h 57min → 59min)
– 50% less energy
– Fewer cycles (28 vs. 32) with similar results & less variation
03.07.2025 12:43 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
This post might change how you do your PCRs
Potentially saving you 46% time, 50% money, and 38% plastic waste
In short: DOI: 10.1016/j.biochi.2024.01.013
In more detail in the thread below:
03.07.2025 12:43 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
DOI: 10.1038/s41557-025-01845-5
30.06.2025 10:00 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
= Something we throw away every day could soon become a medicine
Plastic is organic. It contains carbon. And carbon can be reused.
-> The same chemistry that created the plastic crisis might just help clean it up—and ease some pain along the way.
Now that’s transformation isn't it?
30.06.2025 10:00 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
In a recent breakthrough, Johnson et al. developed a new route to produce paracetamol:
No fossil fuels required.
The chemistry:
PET → terephthalic acid → para-aminobenzoic acid (a natural E. coli metabolite) → 4-aminophenol → paracetamol
Improved yield from 29% to 92%.
30.06.2025 10:00 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
Paracetamol is normally made from phenol, which is derived from oil—using the energy-intensive cumene process.
In short: pain relief comes from fossil fuels.
But scientists have now found another way.
They start with used PET plastic bottles.
30.06.2025 10:00 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
We can now make paracetamol—the world’s most-used painkiller—from plastic waste.
Yes, seriously. Here’s how 🧵
#STEM #Environment #Innovation
30.06.2025 10:00 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
These events are where:
✨ Friendships are built
🔬 Internships and collabs are born
🌍 You feel part of a scientific community
Just because it’s not lab work doesn’t mean it’s not real work!
@enableconference.bsky.social @iubmbtrainee.bsky.social @iubmb.bsky.social @febsjuniorsection.bsky.social
19.06.2025 13:14 — 👍 2 🔁 2 💬 0 📌 0
Instead of running yet another experiment, students should learn this:
💬 Going to events.
🤝 Talking to peers.
🧠 Learning how to discuss science—not just do science.
Networking is a skill, not a shortcut.
19.06.2025 13:14 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
An initiative for life science students and young scientists.
Explore groundbreaking news and research from PNAS, one of the world's most-cited scientific journals. Discover its sibling journal, @pnasnexus.org, both official journals of the National Academy of Sciences. Visit www.pnas.org for more info.
A legacy of discovery. A future of innovation.
Nature Portfolio’s high-quality products and services across the life, physical, chemical and applied sciences is dedicated to serving the scientific community.
Cutting-edge research, news, commentary, and visuals from the Science family of journals. https://www.science.org
An element of truth - videos about science, education, and interesting things.
The funder-researcher collaboration and open-access publisher for research in the life and biomedical sciences.
Follow @eLifeCommunity.bsky.social
Research, news, and commentary from Nature, the international science journal. For daily science news, get Nature Briefing: https://go.nature.com/get-Nature-Briefing
official Bluesky account (check username👆)
Bugs, feature requests, feedback: support@bsky.app