BLOG: 1960s LOD Ukraine News
β all good (Feb 9)
β no new news today
You can read it here:
1960styleukrainenews.substack.com/p/1960s-lod-...
@doomsdaydebunks.bsky.social
BLOG: 1960s LOD Ukraine News
β all good (Feb 9)
β no new news today
You can read it here:
1960styleukrainenews.substack.com/p/1960s-lod-...
We may be headed for another few days of no new news. If Iβd done this blog since the war started, most days would have been no news days for my readers.
BLOG: 1960s LOD Ukraine News
β all good (Feb 8)
β no new news today
You can read it here:
1960styleukrainenews.substack.com/p/1960s-lod-...
Should read June 2026:
BLOG: 1960s LOD Ukraine News
β all good (Feb 7)
β US sets timetable hopefully leading to peace treaty by June 2026
β with next three way meeting with US / Russia / Ukraine next week in US probably Miami
You can read it here:
1960styleukrainenews.substack.com/p/1960s-lod-...
BLOG: 1960s LOD Ukraine News
β all good (Feb 7)
β US sets timetable hopefully leading to peace treaty by June 2025
β with next three way meeting with US / Russia / Ukraine next week in US probably Miami
You can read it here:
1960styleukrainenews.substack.com/p/1960s-lod-...
BLOG: 1960s LOD Ukraine News
β all good (Feb 5)
β talks went well but details secret
β agreed to meet again possibly in America
β first prisoner exchange in 5 months
β Progress on what comes after New START
You can read it here:
1960styleukrainenews.substack.com/p/1960s-lod-...
BLOG: 1960s LOD Ukraine News
β all good (Feb 4)
β first round of talks between Russia and Ukraine concluded in Abu Dhabi
β 5 hours
β second round tomorrow
β will update if anything is shared about them
You can read it here:
1960styleukrainenews.substack.com/p/1960s-lod-...
BLOG: 1960s LOD Ukraine News
β all good (Feb 3)
β sadly Russia resumed attacks on Ukrainian energy systems
β likely out of mistaken belief this makes it easier to achieve their goals in negotiations
You can read it here:
1960styleukrainenews.substack.com/p/1960s-lod-...
BLOG: 1960s LOD Ukraine News
β all good (Feb 2)
β βve: Next trilateral meetings with Ukraine / US / Russia on track for Wed Feb 4 to Thur Feb 5
β βve: Russian energy strikes moratorium continues
You can read it here:
1960styleukrainenews.substack.com/p/1960s-lod-...
BLOG: Trump's goal in Iran is a peace deal
β any strike will be calibrated for diplomacy
β not regime change
β not got the forces there for second "Gulf war"
β wars that start in the Middle East stay there
You can read it here:
robertinventor.substack.com/p/trumps-goa...
BLOG: 1960s LOD Ukraine News
β all good (Feb 1)
β βve: date for next Russia / Ukraine / US talks in Abud Dhabi set to Feb 3-4 -βve: Russian pause on strikes on Ukrainian electricity grid continues for now
You can read it here:
1960styleukrainenews.substack.com/p/1960s-lod-...
Their decision about universal injunctions left open two ways to block the order
The lower courts proceeded to use both methods to block the order while the cases continued through the courts.
robertinventor.substack.com/p/trumps-bir...
Oh and it does NOT show a corrupt court. They are just originalists. The original case was about universal injunctions not birthright citizenship. I go into why they made that extraordinary decision here.
robertinventor.substack.com/p/after-supr...
I've written up my reply to you in our voluntary fact checking forum as ddebunked.org/d/1732-volok...
01.02.2026 10:46 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0So the likely interpretation is that the Supreme Court chose this case in order to put the whole question to rest as quickly and decisively as possible. That is from Volokh Conspiracy which is very respected / authoritative.
reason.com/volokh/2025/...
Although the language is the same, for originalists the meaning was clearer at the time it was put into law and since then it's always been interpreted the same way. That makes the Supreme Court's task much simpler and easier to achieve a 9 : 0 decision against the government.
01.02.2026 10:27 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0So the Supreme Court chose a case that makes it easy for them to focus on the easier question of the interpretation of 8 U.S.C. 1401(a) which lets them sidestep the question of whether the U.S. Constitution permits Congress to pass legislation to interpret 14th Amendment Section 1 differently.
01.02.2026 10:26 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0But wait, some may argue, doesn't the statute merely repeat the language of the Fourteenth Amendment? ... Yes it is the same language, but the public meaning of the statute, when enacted, need not have been the same as the public meaning of the earlier-adopted constitutional provision. ... that interpretation would be entitled to statutory stare decisis ... even if one were to believe ... that Congress has the power to narrow the scope of birthright citizenship through legislation. ... What this means is that the Court could simply hold that the Executive Order conflicts with the longstanding interpretation of 8 U.S.C. 1401(a) and defer to another day whether Congress could enact legislation adopting a narrower rule.
8 U.S. Code Β§ 1401 - Nationals and citizens of United States at birth The following shall be nationals and citizens of the United States at birth: (a) a person born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof; (b) a person born in the United States to a member of an Indian, Eskimo, Aleutian, or other aboriginal tribe: Provided, That the granting of citizenship under this subsection shall not in any manner impair or otherwise affect the right of such person to tribal or other property;
Constitution of the United States Fourteenth Amendment Section 1 All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.
It's okay. Every lower court justice ruled against the government's interpretation. Supreme Court case asks about 8 U.S.C. 1401(a) www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/... which codifies 14th amendment section 1 constitution.congress.gov/constitution... Volokh Conspiracy:
reason.com/volokh/2025/...
If it's feasible I recommend blocking anyone who tweets her material. Not because of her overall goals but because the material is scary because it is inaccurate and mistaken.
31.01.2026 22:29 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Main thing she misses out is the expected immediate legal challenges. She is NOT reliable, because she slants things out of activism in a very major way. ddebunked.org/d/1659-kansa...
31.01.2026 22:27 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0BLOG: 1960s LOD Ukraine News
β all good (Jan 31)
β tripartite talks between US, Ukraine and Russia delayed a few days until Iran situation is sorted out
β as expected for meetings in UAE close to Iran
You can read it here:
1960styleukrainenews.substack.com/p/1960s-lod-...
BLOG: 1960s LOD Ukraine News
β all good (Jan 29)
β Trump claims that Putin will stop strikes on Ukrainian cities for a week during the cold weather
You can read it here:
1960styleukrainenews.substack.com/p/1960s-lod-...
BLOG: 1960s LOD Ukraine News
β all good (Jan 28)
β some discussion of when and where Zelensky would meet Putin but too early to arrange that meeting yet
You can read it here:
1960styleukrainenews.substack.com/p/1960s-lod-...
BLOG: Doomsday clock increasingly means less and less
β not peer reviewed
β and fails numerous fact checks
β not given the attention to accuracy that academics use for papers for journals
You can read it here:
robertinventor.substack.com/p/doomsday-c...
BLOG: 1960s LOD Ukraine News
β all good (Jan 27)
β unnamed US officials told reporters that the Russians are far more flexible privately than publicly (story in Kyiv Independent)
You can read it here:
1960styleukrainenews.substack.com/p/1960s-lod-...
BLOG: 1960s LOD Ukraine News
β all good (Jan 26)
β Russia and Ukraine both say the trilateral talks involving US were constructive
β next round Feb 1
You can read it here:
1960styleukrainenews.substack.com/p/1960s-lod-...
There are numerous reasons why Trump would not attack Mexico including that he depends on Mexico to help control the border on its own side.
26.01.2026 23:13 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Trump did not say Mexico just said "could be anywhere"
26.01.2026 23:13 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Both US and Mexico agreed on:
> The Secretaries reaffirmed the importance of the U.S.-Mexico partnership, **grounded in mutual respect for sovereignty, while acknowledging that more must be done** to confront shared threats.
www.state.gov/releases/off...
He doesn't name Mexico in the interview. Claudia Sheinbaum, president of Mexico, is confident that Trump won't invade Mexico. www.lemonde.fr/en/internati...
26.01.2026 23:10 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 01960s LOD Ukraine News
β all good (Jan 25)
β security guarantees 100% ready
β next meeting of US, Ukraine and Russia on Feb 1
1960styleukrainenews.substack.com/p/1960s-lod-...