Julia Levin's Avatar

Julia Levin

@jflevin.bsky.social

Posting about climate justice and energy policy. Associate Director, National Climate @ Environmental Defence Canada (on parental leave). Views my own. She/her. Settler on stolen land. πŸ“Unceded territory of the Algonquin Anishinaabeg People / Ottawa

1,238 Followers  |  408 Following  |  406 Posts  |  Joined: 21.12.2023  |  2.339

Latest posts by jflevin.bsky.social on Bluesky

Following Environment Minister Julie Dabrusin's refusal to say whether or not a new pipeline would contribute to climate change yesterday, that makes two major figures in Carney's government who have been unsure about the environmental impact of a new pipeline to export oil to be burned overseas.

02.12.2025 20:23 β€” πŸ‘ 57    πŸ” 28    πŸ’¬ 6    πŸ“Œ 9
Preview
Exxon Heads to Trial on Claims of Campaign of Deception on Climate Change HARTFORD – Oil giant Exxon Mobil Corp. is heading for trial on claims the company marketed fossil fuel products in Connecticut that have contributed to climate change in the state. […]

In Connecticut, Exxon is on trial over their lies and deception to hide their role in fueling climate change

Meanwhile in Canada, Carney has made it easier for oil & gas CEOs to lie to the public without any accountability by removing greenwaxhing bans

ctexaminer.com/2025/12/01/e...

03.12.2025 14:10 β€” πŸ‘ 6    πŸ” 3    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
E&E News: Landowners challenge laws that encourage carbon capture Save My Louisiana asserts that state policies favoring CO2 pipelines and wells are unconstitutional.

While Carney throws more public money at the Pathways project, in the US Landowners challenge laws that encourage carbon capture

subscriber.politicopro.com/article/eene...?

03.12.2025 14:04 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Carney's dismantling of climate progress came as a surprise to many

@woodsideful.bsky.social explains Carney's interest in climate was always re risk/opportunity to big banks

As PM "Carney is using the Trump effect as political cover to pursue the deregulatory agenda he’s long wanted"

01.12.2025 14:57 β€” πŸ‘ 8    πŸ” 6    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Everything single thing LeBlanc says in this interview is wrong or misleading

Is he grossly misinformed or just lying?

www.cbc.ca/listen/live-... www.cbc.ca/listen/live-...

30.11.2025 13:22 β€” πŸ‘ 6    πŸ” 3    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Just listening to The House - maybe Minister LeBlanc should stop lying to Canadians

The MOU will INCREASE climate pollution - it weakens/kills major climate and environmental legislation and gets nothing in exchange

This new government has no integrity

30.11.2025 13:18 β€” πŸ‘ 7    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 1
Preview
Carney's latest pipedream explained Prime Minister Mark Carney wants to see the Pathways Alliance project built in exchange for a new oil pipeline to the BC coast β€” a risky bet on the country’s economic future.

The Pathways Alliance project would inevitably be a massive boondoggle if it ever gets built. It’s only purpose is to greenwash the oil industry and deceive Canadians into thinking we can be a clean petrostate.

29.11.2025 15:06 β€” πŸ‘ 110    πŸ” 46    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 4
Preview
Execs are embracing AI more than their employees are, new research suggests Research from HR software company Dayforce suggests that executives are leaning into AI far more than their employees.

A study by Dayforce shows 87% of executives use AI for work, compared to 57% of managers and just 27% of employees.

I think this explains the massive disconnect we see in how CEOs talk about AI versus everyone else. It also raises the question of how useful it truly is for frontline work?

28.11.2025 10:58 β€” πŸ‘ 1973    πŸ” 553    πŸ’¬ 176    πŸ“Œ 574

Do yourself a favour and read this excellent article from @arnokopecky.bsky.social

"Pierre Pollievre might still be the official opposition, but everyone knows who the real conservative leader is now."

29.11.2025 00:55 β€” πŸ‘ 12    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

In just half a year, Carney has dismantled almost all of the climate progress Canada had made over the last decade

It's neck and neck between him and Trump for who ruined things fastest

*of course, Trump has Carney beat on a long list of things like destroying democracy and people's lives

28.11.2025 13:19 β€” πŸ‘ 12    πŸ” 4    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 1
Preview
β€˜The answer is no and always will be’: UBCIC on Alberta-Canada MOU The Union of B.C. Indian Chiefs (UBCIC) says it’s against the MOU signed Thursday morning to build a massive new bitumen pipeline from Alberta to the B.C. coast.

β€œThis MOU is nothing less than a high risk and deeply irresponsible agreement that sacrifices Indigenous peoples, coastal communities, and the environment for political convenience,” says Grand Chief Stewart Phillip, president of the UBCIC.

28.11.2025 13:02 β€” πŸ‘ 7    πŸ” 4    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Who do you think will issue CCfDs? The feds (rightly) realized it made no sense - huge financial liabilities. The small number that the CGF finalized are losing money. Do you actually think AB will move ahead with CCfDs?

28.11.2025 12:55 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
β€˜The answer is no and always will be’: UBCIC on Alberta-Canada MOU The Union of B.C. Indian Chiefs (UBCIC) says it’s against the MOU signed Thursday morning to build a massive new bitumen pipeline from Alberta to the B.C. coast.

The Union of B.C. Indian Chiefs (UBCIC) says it’s against the memorandum of understanding that Canada and Alberta Thursday morning.

The MOU explicitly endorses the construction of a massive new bitumen pipeline from Alberta to the B.C. coast.

28.11.2025 00:41 β€” πŸ‘ 152    πŸ” 75    πŸ’¬ 9    πŸ“Œ 5

I'm not holding my breath

28.11.2025 01:49 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

All of this was ostensibly to strengthen industrial carbon pricing, but it's actually set to weaken pricing and undermine the entire regime

28.11.2025 01:40 β€” πŸ‘ 21    πŸ” 6    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 1
Post image

Apparently Smith is interpreting $130 as the headline price

28.11.2025 01:38 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Well this just in from Smith's chief of staff

28.11.2025 01:37 β€” πŸ‘ 7    πŸ” 6    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 4

Apparently Smith in an interview referred to $130 as the headline price....

28.11.2025 01:33 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I'd even say 2030 is optimistic!

28.11.2025 00:58 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Federal-Alberta MOU risks unravelling Canada’s climate policy While promised improvements to industrial carbon pricing are positive and important, other aspects of Alberta-Canada MOU will undermine policy effectiveness across the country.

Also we have no guarantees that anything in the MOU actually strengthens industrial carbon pricing at all...and the climate Institute makes a compelling case that the MOU undermines the regime
climateinstitute.ca/news/mou-alb...

28.11.2025 00:54 β€” πŸ‘ 6    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I had assumed the headline price would still follow the existing schedule, and the $130 "minimum effective price" would ensure a minimum cost of credits - is that too generous an interpretation?

28.11.2025 00:44 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

I had assumed the headline price would still follow the existing schedule, and the "minimum effective price" would ensure a minimum cost of credits - is that too generous an interpretation?

28.11.2025 00:42 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

So, basically, BC electricity goes to Alberta to support energy-hungry AI data centres, CCUS & oil production and/or gas and nuclear-powered electricity from Alberta comes to BC to support LNG and mining...

27.11.2025 22:54 β€” πŸ‘ 20    πŸ” 13    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 3

The feds should have improved the required tightening rates in OBPS.

The concessions have been made. Clean electricity is dead, for example.

27.11.2025 23:56 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Alberta had already agreed to the $170 pricing schedule. Then they retracted support this year. Now we're pretending we're getting something new from them in exchange for dismantling a whole suite of regulations which would have delivered way more reductions. Also Smith's support won't last long

27.11.2025 23:48 β€” πŸ‘ 16    πŸ” 3    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Can we all finally agree these guys are oil and gas shills and stop calling them a climate organization?

27.11.2025 23:40 β€” πŸ‘ 7    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

What a pathetic excuse for a progressive

27.11.2025 23:39 β€” πŸ‘ 7    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

100%. Max has completely misread what happened.

27.11.2025 23:22 β€” πŸ‘ 13    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Carney dismantled clean electricity regs, weakened methane rules & promised more O&G subsidies...in exchange for Smith's word that she'll support $130 carbon price - which she had supported until recently, realizing she could leverage opposition to it. She'll oppose it as soon as it's convenient

27.11.2025 22:53 β€” πŸ‘ 50    πŸ” 5    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 0

πŸ‘πŸ‘πŸ‘

27.11.2025 22:44 β€” πŸ‘ 16    πŸ” 3    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

@jflevin is following 20 prominent accounts