The scholar who told us all to stop bowling alone would have been bowling alone himself, if not for his wife.
10.03.2025 19:09 — 👍 206 🔁 31 💬 3 📌 3@gabrielbmadeira.bsky.social
Ph.D. Candidate in Institutions, Policy and Government at the FGV - Brazilian School of Public Administration.
The scholar who told us all to stop bowling alone would have been bowling alone himself, if not for his wife.
10.03.2025 19:09 — 👍 206 🔁 31 💬 3 📌 3*Please repost* @sjgreenwood.bsky.social and I just launched a new personalized feed (*please pin*) that we hope will become a "must use" for #academicsky. The feed shows posts about papers filtered by *your* follower network. It's become my default Bluesky experience bsky.app/profile/pape...
10.03.2025 18:14 — 👍 509 🔁 293 💬 24 📌 79This looks excellent. The ability to keep up with people's new working papers and articles is one of the things that the other place used to be great for. This feed makes it very easy. 👇
12.03.2025 13:57 — 👍 2 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0ok i think i have it
09.03.2025 15:10 — 👍 6 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 1De acordo!
E o episódio do mutirão do porco na serra da canastra é algo indescritível
We streamlined six new DID-like estimators and created this tutorial for implementation in R.
yiqingxu.org/packages/fec...
Hope you no longer need to spend months figuring out what these estimators are and how to use them.
New (open access) publication with @philipp-kerler.bsky.social. We draw on fieldwork to build a theoretical model that outlines the conditions when the expectation of clientelism can drive selective political engagement, something we call asymmetric participation. #distributivepolitics #clientelism
14.02.2025 15:41 — 👍 13 🔁 5 💬 0 📌 0Tá me dando paúra vocês falando de combater as torcidas organizadas usando o mesmo vocabulário da guerra às drogas
02.02.2025 13:02 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0acho engraçado o recibo que os hómi passam toda vez que algum deles (ou vários deles) tem seu machismo escroto exposto por uma mulher. dessa vez uma escritora foi acusada de monetizar um chifre de 15 anos atrás num podcast por um dos homens supostamente envolvidos.
19.01.2025 12:21 — 👍 235 🔁 23 💬 6 📌 3Esse fio da Jessica Calarco é muito importante por muitos motivos. Vale a pena!
19.01.2025 14:53 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0It doesn't surprise me that privileged men are more likely to believe (incorrectly) that they're worse off than women or to blame feminism for the challenges they face. As I show in Holding It Together, dude-fluencers push this view to keep us divided. 2/
www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/697130...
Despite patriarchy's persistence, growing numbers of men believe they have it worse off than women. And, new research shows this "male victimhood" ideology is most common among men who aren't facing hardship. Which means what they're really feeling is status loss. 1/
www.psypost.org/male-victimh...
Um ano atrás
Bluesky now has over 10 million users, and I was #1,164,840!
Boa notícia mesmo!
10.09.2024 13:12 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Está em desenvolvimento ainda, mas acho útil: electionsbr.com/livro
09.09.2024 19:11 — 👍 12 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 1Nosso painel é este e, em inglês (quem me dera em português ou mesmo espanhol), vou agora à tarde tentar explicar o diff-in-diff (como eu vim parar aqui?), feito com Thiago Fonseca e @guedesneto.bsky.social , para avaliar o impacto da regra que determinou que votos para mulheres contavam em dobro.
07.09.2024 16:12 — 👍 14 🔁 3 💬 0 📌 1