Hannah Overbye-Thompson

International Communication Association

Good news! 🎉
The registration issue has been resolved — everything should now work smoothly.
🔗 Direct link: www.icahdq.org/event/Hackat...

🗓 Registration is open until April 5, 2026
Looking forward to seeing you at the ICA Hackathon 2026 @SU School for Data Science and Computational Thinking! 🚀💡

Current explanations for political divides in entertainment media use identify divergent preferences for or evaluations of content. According to the theory of normative social behavior (TNSB), extratextual information such as cues about the audience may also influence exposure intentions due to viewers’ perceptions of ingroup norms. Social media users discuss and form communities around entertainment content while conveying partisan and racial identities. A preregistered experiment exposed Black and White partisans (N = 1,259) to tweets in which a television show was endorsed by co- or out-partisans who were racial in- or out-group members. Exposure intentions were stronger when endorsement came from co-partisans; however, this effect was stronger for White partisans. Treatment effects were mediated by perceived ingroup norms and perceptions of how much of the audience consisted of ingroup members. Implications of multiple identities (i.e., race and partisanship) for the TNSB and the study of partisan entertainment divides are discussed.

🚨New pub alert!🚨 Now available open-access in @hcr-journal.bsky.social, I show how endorsements of entertainment media from ingroup members, particularly inpartisans, affect exposure intentions, with differential effects across racial lines. #PolComm #PoliSci #Politics #MediaStudies 🧵

New year, new chapter! I am incredibly excited to share that starting in fall 2026, I'll be joining Michigan State University as a tenure-track Assistant Professor in Advertising + PR.

A big thank you to everyone who has been extra kind during my job market year & Go Green! 💚🤍

A diffusion of innovations measurement scale for reinvention, relative advantage, compatibility, complexity, trialability and observability Diffusion of innovations (DOI) theory identifies critical factors that influence technology adoption rates and offers a predictive model for understanding how innovations spread through populations. W...

doi.org/10.1371/jour...

I've noticed w/research it's often hard to find validated measures of constructs without hobbling together scales from multiple papers; now when possible I try to contribute by validating scales. Below is a scale that I hope is helpful that measures the perceptual attributes of DOI + reinvention 🧪

The differential effects of algorithmic recommendations on user experience: Enjoyment and serendipity in everyday music streaming | Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference of the ACM Greek SIG...

dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/...

Fabulous study by @felix-dietrich.de @aliciaernst.bsky.social @rkreling.bsky.social et al., examining how algorithmic curation affects music streaming UX. Key finding: More algorithmic recommendations = less enjoyment, BUT listening sessions w/algorithmic curation were perceived as more novel 🧪

New study (2025) examines how AI autonomy affects user agency and attitudes. Key finding: AI autonomy triggers psychological reactance through threats to freedom, BUT personalization benefits cancel this out + users with higher agency feel more threatened by autonomous AI 🧪

doi.org/10.1080/0883...

Racial Bias in AI Training Data: Do Laypersons Notice? Given that the nature of training data is the primary cause of algorithmic bias, do laypersons realize that systematic misrepresentation and under-representation of certain races in the training da...

doi.org/10.1080/1521...

New study (2025) examines if people can detect bias in AI training data. Key finding: Training data cues were largely ineffective; users relied on AI performance instead to judge bias + consistent with prior work on AI bias, the majority of participants failed to notice any bias in training data 🧪

New paper (2025) by @len-s.bsky.social proposes the PMSIS model: parents can use racially diverse entertainment media + "foreground co-viewing" + active mediation to improve children's intergroup socialization 🧪 doi.org/10.1093/annc...

Great work Sovannie 👏👏👏 #commsky

What Is an Algorithm? A Cross-Cultural Examination of Social Media Users’ Mental Associations on Algorithms Volume 6, Issue 3. DOI: 10.1037/tmb0000170

tmb.apaopen.org/pub/7w7ecobk

Fabulous work 👏👏👏

New study by @janadreston.bsky.social @anneo.bsky.social & @germanneubaum.bsky.social reveals how users understand algorithms. Key findings: 71% have a basic understanding of algorithms but only 33% can explain how they work; users see themselves as passive actors when interacting with algorithms 🧪

Personally, I had a lot of fun on this project. It was my first time leading a mixed-methods study and an all-student team. I hope this research is useful for informing design, policy, and education efforts that help people feel more empowered in the algorithmic age.

Demographics mattered too:

👩‍🦱 Women & people of color often described avoidant attitudes—seeing risks but feeling powerless. Which makes sense, as they are often the target of algorithmic bias

👨 White men sometimes saw systemic risks but reported higher efficacy.

Qual findings:

⚠️ Risks clustered around mental health, privacy, fairness, and polarization.

💡 Efficacy beliefs were split into: Powerlessness, Strategic consumption (user tactics) & Collective responsibility (policy, regulation, audits)

Quant findings:

📊 People saw organizational algorithms as riskier than personal ones.

📊 But they also felt less able to mitigate bias in those systems.

In other words, the higher the stakes, the less control people feel.

Drawing from the Risk Perception Attitude framework, we studied how people think about algorithmic bias in both:

- Organizational algorithms (e.g., hiring, healthcare, policing)
- Individual-use algorithms (e.g., search engines, facial filters)

Excited to share my new paper with @garciaerick.bsky.social Xinyi Zhang & @laurentwang.bsky.social.

We ask: Do people see algorithmic bias as a risk—and do they feel capable of addressing it? Answer... It depends! More below 👇🧪 #commsky

doi.org/10.1080/1044...

Practical, epistemic and normative implications of algorithmic bias in healthcare artificial intelligence: a qualitative study of multidisciplinary expert perspectives Background There is a growing concern about artificial intelligence (AI) applications in healthcare that can disadvantage already under-represented and marginalised groups (eg, based on gender or race...

jme.bmj.com/content/51/6...

New study by Aquino et al. provides a fabulous look at differing opinions about algorithmic bias held by healthcare professionals. 72 experts had 3 key disagreements: whether bias exists (most say yes, some no), who's responsible for fixing it & whether to include race/ethnicity data in AI systems 🧪

doi.org/10.1037/xge0...

New study by @drjt.bsky.social examines if attention control explains the 🔗 between inspection time tasks and intelligence. Key finding: attention control fully mediated the inspection time-intelligence relationship + people with better sustained attention showed less performance decline over time 🧪

🎉 Huge congrats to our team @overbye.bsky.social, Kristy Hamilton and @jacobtfisher.online for receiving a Top Student Paper award in the Communication & Social Cognition Division at #NCA25! 🏆

4. The Oracle of Bacon 🥓🎬
A classic: plug in any actor and see how many steps it takes to reach Kevin Bacon (or any other actor).
Based on co-appearances in films. oracleofbacon.org

3. The Beer Graph 🍺
Curious how Lagers relate to Stouts?
This interactive network lets you explore how beers are connected by taste, aroma, and appearance.
Fun use of similarity graphs!
seekshreyas.github.io/beerviz/

YouTube video by BBC World Service How trees secretly talk to each other - BBC World Service

2. The Hidden Network of Trees 🌳
Trees communicate underground using fungal networks; sharing nutrients, warning of threats, and shaping forest life.
A lovely example of why we study two-mode networks

🍄📡 www.youtube.com/watch?v=DUqE...

In the Network of the Conclave - Bocconi University How network science can help us understand who will be the next Pope. The study by Soda, Iorio, and Rizzo reveals how status, information and alliances influence the papal election.

1. Who Will Be the Next Pope?
Network science can help us predict it.
The Network Conclave project mapped connections between cardinals; before Robert Prevost was selected, we could see he had the highest eigenvector centrality (i.e., he knew important others).
👑🌐 www.unibocconi.it/en/news/netw...

After a great summer teaching Social Networks at UCSB, I wanted to share 4 of my favorite network examples we explored in class 🧪🧵

1. Who Will Be the Next Pope?
2. The Hidden Network of Trees 🌳
3. The Beer Graph 🍺
4. The Oracle of Bacon 🥓🎬

Psychopathology and Gaming Disorder in Adolescents This cohort study uses data from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study to examine directional longitudinal associations between psychopathology and gaming disorder among adolescents.

jamanetwork.com/journals/jam...