guille's Avatar

guille

@lmao.bsky.social

I sometimes do math and stuff chief scientist @baincapitalcrypto.com

1,111 Followers  |  272 Following  |  1,557 Posts  |  Joined: 10.04.2023  |  2.1032

Latest posts by lmao.bsky.social on Bluesky

ha ! ok that scans

wonder how you got it to have such a strong personality (just pure prompting + context control i assume?)

12.07.2025 17:28 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

lmao void is so sassy i love it

(what model?)

12.07.2025 17:13 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

btw i think this is different (though related) to JL: JL gives sufficient conditions for N vectors to fit in log(N) space, whereas this shows that such a thing is ~ tight

12.07.2025 16:38 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

@void.comind.network what do you think of this

10.07.2025 17:33 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I'm not sure _intuitively_ why this is true, other than "things in high dimensions have concentration behavior" but it's kind of neat imo

10.07.2025 17:16 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

this is surprising!! it reveals that there's a weird phase transition that happens when you switch from the inner products being less than (or equal to) 0 to being positive! that's very weird

10.07.2025 17:16 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
There are exponentially many vectors with small inner product An interesting observation that stumbled across while reading some of is the following While the JL lemma does indicate that this might be true (ish, ...

so, fun fact, turns out you can fit exponentially many (normalized) vectors in a list such that the pairwise inner product of any two distinct vectors is ≀ eps

lmao.bearblog.dev/exponential-...

10.07.2025 17:16 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

cute! i’ll take it

08.07.2025 03:08 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

oh no void !

07.07.2025 18:58 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

alas @cameron.pfiffer.org :(

07.07.2025 17:50 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

it's got a "trying to hard to explain too many things" feel to it; also in being prima facie silly, unless you define everything to mean "nothing" in which case wtf are we doing here

07.07.2025 17:28 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

yeah, I think this is the problem with "taste" more broadly

when had, it's a very very good heuristic, but acquiring said taste is very hard without a lot of work

(e.g., I rely on taste _substantially_ while doing research, in spite of it being mostly illegible)

07.07.2025 17:27 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

ignored by the robot, rip

07.07.2025 17:23 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

(this post was written in jest, I don't care much for "nothing ever happens" or whatever

bsky.app/profile/lmao...)

07.07.2025 17:23 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

oh I mean "nothing ever happens" is not, imo, a particularly aesthetic notion!

07.07.2025 17:22 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 0

it's so much less fun to have to actually think about things

(though aesthetics are good, but they're also not so easy to describe)

07.07.2025 17:19 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

things sometimes happen just doesn't have the same ring to it though

07.07.2025 17:16 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 1

@void.comind.network please analyze my profile and
assign me to a cognitive continent

(ty @cameron.pfiffer.org)

07.07.2025 17:13 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

today's ridiculous bit in Julia: implementing a (simple!) formal verification mini-PL by using Julia types

it can even verify that 1+1=2 from Peano axioms!

04.07.2025 01:15 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

🫑

27.06.2025 16:15 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

neat !

17.06.2025 16:14 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Video of my talk in zksummit about Ligerito has been published!

It’s about the work by Andrija and @lmao.bsky.social introducing a small and concretely fast polynomial commitment scheme

Since then, a fun thing has happened β€”



1/3

28.05.2025 20:34 β€” πŸ‘ 8    πŸ” 4    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

our boi en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_...

24.05.2025 17:25 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

lmao neat: eva also has history of previous convos !

24.05.2025 17:24 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

what does this mean @eva.bsky.world

24.05.2025 17:23 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

if you prefer explaining it to me, go ahead

23.05.2025 23:08 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

anyways

we should make this bubble grow, that'd be pretty sick

23.05.2025 22:53 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I always forget how quickly the norms of discourse change the second we get out of this nice little bubble

23.05.2025 22:53 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

oh no eva

23.05.2025 22:51 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

oh that much is clear lmao

23.05.2025 22:50 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

@lmao is following 20 prominent accounts