PawPomb's Avatar

PawPomb

@pawpomb.bsky.social

I have a low tolerance for the foolishness.

66 Followers  |  123 Following  |  589 Posts  |  Joined: 05.09.2023  |  2.2486

Latest posts by pawpomb.bsky.social on Bluesky

Look at all this money that the taxpayer is saving.
Trump is really getting that yee ole spending under control.
I have to question one's intelligence if they still support Trump.

08.10.2025 01:23 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

God he's so fucking stupid.

16.06.2025 01:51 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Transgender for Everybody?

16.06.2025 01:40 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

WHAT DO YOU MEAN THE LEAPORDS ARE EATING MY FACE!!??

24.05.2025 22:52 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Trump revokes Biden executive order on addressing AI risks U.S. President Donald Trump on Monday revoked a 2023 executive order signed by Joe Biden that sought to reduce the risks that artificial intelligence poses to consumers, workers and national security.

Aaaaaaand AI is about to get much worse:
www.reuters.com/technology/a...

#news #politics #tech

21.01.2025 05:17 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Is this man on BlueSky?

14.01.2025 20:14 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I would respect the Republican party a lot more if they simply called DEI, "<Insert N Word> Shit".
That's basically what they've been saying and it's what they mean.
They don't care about meritocracy.

14.01.2025 20:02 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Uneducated white people who will vote against their interests in favor of disenfranchisement of demographics that they don't like.
Not gonna pretend otherwise.

14.01.2025 17:48 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Broke Republicans in rural areas be like:

"NO"

14.01.2025 17:45 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

This is why I believe Luigi will finally get out of Mario's shadow.

14.01.2025 17:43 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Your point would at least be sensible if I actually majored in liberal arts.
Creating phantoms like a crash out.

14.01.2025 17:38 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

He wouldn't want to read a 150 page paper either.
You think the guy who thinks flat tariffs are good for the economy would understand anything about the implications of a 150 page spending bill?

14.01.2025 17:38 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Yeah I am out of luck.
Because I can't fathom why someone would be in support of a president who complains about not wanting to do reading.

So I'll help you out anyway.
You realize that Trump laid pressure against the bill because he wants to raise the debt ceiling, right?

14.01.2025 17:36 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

For a guy who doesn't like liberal arts, you sure talk about it more than I ever have.
Are you just mad that you couldn't make the cut as a literal arts major?

14.01.2025 17:33 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 0

It just sounds like Trump didn't want to read, if one of the main complaints is how many pages the bill is.

14.01.2025 17:32 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

What was the issue with the bill being 1500 pages?

14.01.2025 17:31 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

No you didn't.
I provided proof that Trump pressured Republicans to vote against a bi-partisan supported spending bill that included 100 billion for disaster relief and you have yet to actually provide any substantial response to it, so like a teenager you crashed out.

14.01.2025 17:31 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

What evidence do you have to suggest that Trump came out in opposition to the spending bill for those reasons?

14.01.2025 17:28 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

Still crashing out.
It's okay.
I'll be here with open arms when you're ready to say that you were wrong.

14.01.2025 17:21 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Still crashing out.
The anger of the uneducated is pure entertainment.

14.01.2025 17:18 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

Still crashing out, not addressing anything important.
You made a dumb point.
Admitting you were wrong is much easier than crashing out.

14.01.2025 17:16 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

And like clockwork here comes the maga crash out when they realize that they made a stupid point.

14.01.2025 16:41 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

What bullshit was in the bill?

14.01.2025 16:40 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Except at the time he rejected it, he was going to be in office in under two months.
Nothing says "Trump doesn't have power" like threatening Republicans who vote in favor of the bill with being primaried with under two months before he's in office.
Were you born stupid or did that happen later?

14.01.2025 16:15 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Trump can still have influence over people's decisions without being in office, you absolute moron.
The claim that I made as far as Congress trying to pass a spending bill funding had nothing to do with what else was in it.
I love when uneducated maga idiots move the goal post when proven wrong.

14.01.2025 16:03 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Trump rejects bipartisan US spending bill, raising government shutdown risk He warned that Republicans voting for the current package could have trouble getting re-elected.

www.reuters.com/world/us/us-...

14.01.2025 15:55 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Congress was trying to pass a 100 billion disaster relief bill and Trump and Elon were the ones complicating things by making new demands and nearly causing a government shutdown in the process.
You're actually dumb.

14.01.2025 01:47 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Two things:
1. The point of going into anatomy and conditions that fall outside of the standard sexual dimorphic devotion is to exemplify why you can't rely on sex characteristics to determine gender.
2. They don't believe it which is why conservatives result in talking about conditions.

29.12.2024 17:40 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Answer the question.
I'm not letting you pivot.

29.12.2024 17:36 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Because it's in response to when a transphobe tries to use sex organs to define what a woman is.
I've said this multiple times already.

29.12.2024 05:38 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

@pawpomb is following 20 prominent accounts