Dyson Poincarรฉ's Avatar

Dyson Poincarรฉ

@dyson-poincare.bsky.social

Aviation/Aeronautics/Airport professional living and working in the PNW. Twitter refugee. GA Pilot & skydiver. USN DC(SW) OEF/GWOT, OEF-HOA/AFRICOM Slava Ukraini Art: Laurie Lipton Star Citizen: ORyCLE STAR-N22X-9W33 Youtube: @citizenorycle2129 ๐Ÿช‚โœˆ๏ธโš“๏ธ๐Ÿš€โ˜ข๏ธโš’๏ธ๐Ÿ“ฝ๐Ÿงช๐Ÿฉบ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฆ

315 Followers  |  580 Following  |  2,055 Posts  |  Joined: 06.11.2024  |  2.357

Latest posts by dyson-poincare.bsky.social on Bluesky

No surprise. That's because that voter is an idiot.

09.11.2025 13:07 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Non-commercial and commuter jets have a very small overall impact on the NAS. These operations do not require the same level of services and often operate in and out of non-towered airports. Same goes for cargo.

08.11.2025 15:07 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

I wonder if Slowbert will be next.

05.11.2025 01:56 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Its is? Fuckin idiot.

05.11.2025 01:08 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Oh, STFU!

04.11.2025 12:37 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

You're comparing minimum wage to slavery? I think you need to bone up on what slavery is.

04.11.2025 11:56 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image

Nobody wants to play with a ๐Ÿคก

31.10.2025 21:27 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

What I don't understand is you going around with your "I'm a life long democrat", bullshit. You're not going to find the gullible lot you're used to on Truth Social. What do they call your derangement? Whatever it is, "the Dems" are living rent free in your head.

31.10.2025 20:06 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

LOL, I am a "disgrace"? To what, exactly?

Why are you on here trying to hide your red hat? We can see it, clear as day.

31.10.2025 19:34 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

"Life long" democrats don't refer to their party as the "Dems". Seriously, how full of shit are you?
bsky.app/profile/layl...

31.10.2025 19:19 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image

Oh yeah, that clears it up, stooge. When was this meeting?

31.10.2025 14:30 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image

"There are methods which you could do it, it is far too early to think about it."

31.10.2025 14:23 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 2    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

"We're going to win four more years in the White House. And then after that, we'll negotiate, right? Because we're probably, based on the way we were treated, we're probably entitled to another four after that." DJT

31.10.2025 14:21 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 2    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

I was part of the VBSS team aboard the USS Shreveport. This is not normal. We interdicted vessels off the coast of Somalia in 2007 and couldn't do any of this murder stuff. None of the laws have changed. They would have stapled our asses to the captain's mast for this.

31.10.2025 14:11 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 7    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 1

The sites and building would also be temporary structures. They are building compounds. These are to be Trumps "re-education" centers, if he gets his way.

31.10.2025 01:25 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

You've never saluted before, have you, Linda. You know what that means, right?

29.10.2025 13:11 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Preview
bart simpson is looking at a cake that says at least you tried ALT: bart simpson is looking at a cake that says at least you tried
29.10.2025 12:38 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

TDS, huh?

bsky.app/profile/ninj...

29.10.2025 12:36 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

You computer generate cartoon porn. Stay in your lane, kid.

29.10.2025 12:35 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image 28.10.2025 16:32 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Yep, that's how this administration works.

28.10.2025 15:14 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Not a single judge has made a ruling. Not one.

28.10.2025 15:14 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Today Bush #2 would be a liberal, FFS.

28.10.2025 15:13 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Name these "two judges".

28.10.2025 15:10 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

No judgements have been made. As you said, you made an assertion. Do you believe in summary judgement, or something?

28.10.2025 15:09 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Is Kilmar Abrego Garcia an MS-13 member? Here's what the documents say. That rhetoric has only amplified with Abrego Garciaโ€™s criminal indictment in Tennessee where federal prosecutors have brought human smuggling charges.

๐Ÿคก
www.usatoday.com/story/news/i...

28.10.2025 15:07 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Russians are just meat puppets.

28.10.2025 13:07 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

GOP in public: "If you're on SNAP then your ghetto ass deserves to starve. Welfare is the new slavery. It only exists so Dems can bribe urban voters. It attracts illegals like cockroaches."

Also GOP in public: "SNAP, our holiest of traditions, is under threat. The Democrats are so, so cruel."

27.10.2025 14:56 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 2    ๐Ÿ” 1    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Of all the things I'm willing to pay to read, this ain't it.

26.10.2025 12:52 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Here's why the new White House ballroom project is not real. (The demo is obviously real.) Some background - I am a licensed Architect with 20+ years of experience. I have worked on multiple Federal projects with sensitive building programs that required background checks.

1. With a projected size of 90,000sf and a newly revised budget of $300M, the cost per square foot would be $3,333. No building costs anywhere near that. $1,000/sf is astronomical.

2. Let's assume, since we are drawing in the classical, style, that the proportions of the building adhere to the Golden Ratio. A 90,000sf would be a building with a footprint roughly 380' x 235'. Longer than a football field and 1.5x as wide.

2. The building is projected to accommodate 999 people. 15sf/person is required for a banquet area; 20sf/person is pretty comfortable. What you see in the rendering below is closer to 20sf/person. That's only 20,000sf, or a space that is 200'x100'. It's supposed to be a ballroom, so let's be extraordinarily generous and provide 10,000sf for the ballroom support functions, and another 10,000sf for pre-function. Extraordinarily generous. That's STILL only 40,000sf, not even half of the supposed building. 

3. There are no drawings for the building. The renderings are poorly coordinated - exterior views do not match the interior views. See below - the White House is 70 feet tall, to the roof. The interior renderings show a room that is roughly 100' x 200', with a ~20 foot ceiling. The exterior renderings show a building footprint of 4.5x that amount.

Those are renderings that could be produced by young staff in a week or two, at most. Nothing else exists.

Here's why the new White House ballroom project is not real. (The demo is obviously real.) Some background - I am a licensed Architect with 20+ years of experience. I have worked on multiple Federal projects with sensitive building programs that required background checks. 1. With a projected size of 90,000sf and a newly revised budget of $300M, the cost per square foot would be $3,333. No building costs anywhere near that. $1,000/sf is astronomical. 2. Let's assume, since we are drawing in the classical, style, that the proportions of the building adhere to the Golden Ratio. A 90,000sf would be a building with a footprint roughly 380' x 235'. Longer than a football field and 1.5x as wide. 2. The building is projected to accommodate 999 people. 15sf/person is required for a banquet area; 20sf/person is pretty comfortable. What you see in the rendering below is closer to 20sf/person. That's only 20,000sf, or a space that is 200'x100'. It's supposed to be a ballroom, so let's be extraordinarily generous and provide 10,000sf for the ballroom support functions, and another 10,000sf for pre-function. Extraordinarily generous. That's STILL only 40,000sf, not even half of the supposed building. 3. There are no drawings for the building. The renderings are poorly coordinated - exterior views do not match the interior views. See below - the White House is 70 feet tall, to the roof. The interior renderings show a room that is roughly 100' x 200', with a ~20 foot ceiling. The exterior renderings show a building footprint of 4.5x that amount. Those are renderings that could be produced by young staff in a week or two, at most. Nothing else exists.

There are no plans for the ballroom

24.10.2025 15:13 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 618    ๐Ÿ” 314    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 74    ๐Ÿ“Œ 48

@dyson-poincare is following 20 prominent accounts