Fig 4

www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/...

I’m not good at seeing is something is doctored or not, beyond something obvious. Just wanna make sure we’re on the same page here that there is a version of these 2D histograms without the circles in the klimek paper

Yeah. Looks like they blocked DB from commenting

But R5 it isn’t a perfect circle so itzzzzz AnOmoLoUs

This is is so ridiculous lmao.

When you can triple down on being arithmetically inept you have to do it

Interesting where she chose to cut off that quote

OP was made because I thought she exaggerated what her references/sources said. But that was my mistake as I looked in the wrong place of the “rage” e book. That being said I kept the post up because i still think it fits.

She’s interchangeably using deleting votes and deleting voters

grassroots speak is either the most intellectually dishonest person ever, or quite literally has 0 reading comprehension skills

Ughhhhhhhhhh. That puts a serious damper on the dismissal news

GitHub - marketmake2757/nc_election_analysis Contribute to marketmake2757/nc_election_analysis development by creating an account on GitHub.

github.com/marketmake27...

NC analysis.

Just need to add some references/sources

You didn’t make the list yet?

Found it in the 2024 CSV through this link. Thanks!

www.sos.state.co.us/pubs/electio...

Ahh okay. Looks like the percent (in regards to not generating a full recount, if the results were incorrect) aren’t disclosed for the RLA in PA as far as I can tell

GitHub - marketmake2757/mn-turnout-trump-analysis Contribute to marketmake2757/mn-turnout-trump-analysis development by creating an account on GitHub.

github.com/marketmake27...

When you use their subset, and control for 2020 vote share, you actually see trumps vote share decreasing as turnout goes up

Yes, that’s why I said the processes are more rigorous now than at the time this was written

When people ear “x” percent RLA. Do they think that means how many votes are recounted?

Just so no one misses the alt text

ttps://websites.umich.edu/~wmebane/recount2016.pdf

Here’s an excerpt from one of Mebanes papers from 2016. The auditing process is more rigorous now than it was then

https://websites.umich.edu/~wmebane/recount2016.pdf Here’s an excerpt from one of Mebanes papers from 2016. The auditing process is more rigorous now than it was then

Insane dude. If only we had 1000s of other elections we could look at to see if 3rd party candidates get a lot of votes!

It’s some other psychological issue in some cases

Who cares if he was a pedophile or not he committed disgusting crimes that victimized girls under 18.

Pedophile an annoying fucking buzzword that people are obsessed with. It means nothing legally. Some predators of prepubescent children wouldn’t even be considered pedophiles,

Looks like the deadline was today instead of yesterday. I assume whatever happened, it will be updated overnight in the portal. At least I think that’s how it works

bsky.app/profile/mark...

Is this generally the misapplication you are thinking of or is there more?

The Udot misapplication grinds my gears so much. Because it’s just either so ignorant and dumb that they don’t know what it is, or they do know and are trying to trick people

bsky.app/profile/mark...

added daily

@grassrootsspeak.bsky.social I see you’ve doubled down on this in your latest release. Can you explain why you think it’s weird that these percentages remained consistent?

Basic arithmetic says they should remain consistent based on the total number of RV and the average number of RV

Sorry you feel that way, but I wasn’t stating an opinion, rather a fact that has been common in public opinion polling.

And what he says would happen precisely happens in the full report, although again the figures here are only illustrative (same footnote) and not exact, but directionally correct and not anything close to what ETA reported in their lawsuit for Allegegny