David P. Reichert's Avatar

David P. Reichert

@david-p-reichert.bsky.social

AI researcher at Google DeepMind -- views on here are my own. Interested in cognition & AI, consciousness, ethics, figuring out the future.

35 Followers  |  169 Following  |  2 Posts  |  Joined: 01.09.2025  |  1.315

Latest posts by david-p-reichert.bsky.social on Bluesky

TLDR: Seth makes many valid points, but the case for biological naturalism isn't clear-cut IMO. In either case, I don't think his conclusion quite follows from the premises.
 
Ultimately, uncertainty still wins out for me.

29.09.2025 10:22 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0
Preview
Is biology necessary for consciousness? A response to Seth's paper on biological naturalism In this post, I explain why I think that Anil Seth’s recent paper does not make a convincing argument that phenomenal consciousness is inherently biological and that therefore artificial intelligence ...

Can only biological organisms ever be conscious?

Yes, argues @anilseth.bsky.social in a recent paper on biological naturalism.

I'm less convinced, and have written an in-depth response in a blog post here:

davidpreichert.substack.com/p/is-biology-necessary-for-consciousness

29.09.2025 10:22 — 👍 19    🔁 3    💬 4    📌 0

@david-p-reichert is following 20 prominent accounts