@fduchenne.bsky.social
This was the preliminary work of our study focusing on the consequences of nectar robbing for community stability (doi.org/10.1371/jour...), but order of publication got reversed on the way
03.11.2025 20:34 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Both groups of birds pollinate flowers in a legitimate way when flower and bir dmorphologies are compatibel (bill < corolla) and when morphologies are compatible (corolla > bill), both groups shift to robbing, although flowerpiercers shift faster than hummingbirds.
03.11.2025 20:30 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Nice to see the masster thesis of Stéphane Aubert finally published !
doi.org/10.1002/oik....
Flowerpiercers are often seen as robbers and hummingbirds as legitimate pollinators but here we show that it is not so black and white.👇
New preprint reexamining codiversification in mycorrhizal symbioses! 🌱🍄 Spoiler: We found evidence of coevolution, but not cospeciation/codiversification. Congrats Fantine for your great work! 😁
16.05.2025 08:05 — 👍 5 🔁 2 💬 0 📌 0
Downscaling mutualistic networks from species to individuals reveals consistent interaction niches and roles within plant populations Species-level networks emerge as the combination of interactions spanning multiple individuals, and their study has received considerable attention over the past 30 y. However, less is known about the structure of interaction configurations within species, even though individuals are the actual interacting units in nature. We compiled 46 empirical, individual-based, interaction networks on plant-animal seed dispersal mutualisms, comprising 1,037 plant individuals across 29 species from various regions. We compared the structure of individual-based networks to that of species-based networks and, by extending the niche concept to interaction assemblages, we explored individual plant specialization. Using a Bayesian framework to account for uncertainty derived from sampling, we examined how plant individuals “explore” the interaction niche of their populations. Both individual-based and species-based networks exhibited high variability in network properties, lacking remarkable structural and topological differences between them. Within populations, frugivores’ interaction allocation among plant individuals was highly heterogeneous, with one to three frugivore species dominating interactions. Regardless of species or bioregion, plant individuals displayed a variety of interaction profiles across populations, with a consistently-small percentage of individuals playing a central role and exhibiting high diversity in their interaction assemblage. Plant populations showed variable mid to low levels of niche specialization; and individuals’ interaction niche “breadth” accounted for 70% of the population interaction diversity, on average. Our results highlight how downscaling from species to individual-based networks helps understanding the structuring of interactions within ecological communities.
1/ New paper @pnas.org on the structure of mutualistic #networks between individuals plants and frugivore species.
Last chapter of @elequintero.bsky.social's PhD thesis
doi.org/10.1073/pnas... #ecopubs
L'association fermes paysannes et sauvages, qui regroupe pres de 30 fermes et plusieurs naturalistes (dont je fais partie), a repondu a Laurent Wauquiez et Fabrice Pannekoucke.
A lire ici 👇
basta.media/Face-a-Laure...
👴A bit of old fashion network ecology: our paper trying to understand how frequent are forbidden links in plant-hummingbirds networks is now out in Ecology Letters.👇
doi.org/10.1111/ele....
Always a pleasure to work with the EPHI team on these amazing hummingbirds !
