Sean Michael Ragan's Avatar

Sean Michael Ragan

@seanragan.bsky.social

20 Followers  |  17 Following  |  72 Posts  |  Joined: 26.11.2023  |  1.7499

Latest posts by seanragan.bsky.social on Bluesky

Yeah I'ma let you have that argument with somebody else

08.05.2025 19:20 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Preview
India-Pakistan jets clash in one of the largest dogfights in recent history Fighting between the two nuclear rivals has intensified amid international concerns and calls for cooling off

Is this the second Battle of Britain or just a huge wasteful jerk-off? www.newsweek.com/india-pakist...

08.05.2025 18:33 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

You do not care for Bridge Colby?

08.05.2025 16:29 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Deterring China by adequately provisioning our forces and our allies in the South Pacific.

21.04.2025 15:15 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

It mostly means our limited stocks of weapons go to the Pacific theater rather than the European theater. Jake Sullivan himself recently admitted that Biden's miserable "slow walk" strategy was a function of US supply limitations rather than escalation management.

21.04.2025 15:14 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

You have just described a settlement.

31.01.2025 16:12 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Everyone needs to stop freaking out about Trump and face the fact that WWIII is here, and it's only going to escalate during his term. However much you hate him, he's the only President we've got now.

31.01.2025 16:10 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

I voted for Clinton in 2016, Biden in 2020, and Harris in 2024. In each case, I was voting *against* Trump rather than for his opponent. But he's won now, and handily, and though I have grave concerns about his fitness, I do not think he is the biggest threat we face.

30.01.2025 19:23 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

I despise what Russia is doing to Ukraine as much as anyone but Elbridge Colby is probably right that China has to be our priority. It is entirely possible that Russia and China have been planning a squeeze play from the beginning.

30.01.2025 16:20 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 1

We could do worse than Bridge Colby.

30.01.2025 16:17 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

That's a stretch. I don't think Trump is responsible for this.

30.01.2025 16:15 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

You're quite right.

30.01.2025 16:04 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

It has astonished me to see a small but vocal minority of Americans seriously advocating for monarchy. As I see it, there can be no more fundamental betrayal of what it means to be an American. Even segregationists and communists are more authentically American than monarchists.

30.01.2025 00:41 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

It's in your enemy's interest that you underestimate him.

30.01.2025 00:26 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Also, how is it a mistake to overestimate them?

30.01.2025 00:00 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

They won the election.

29.01.2025 23:59 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

What about 14 fronts? Asking for a friend in Beijing...

29.01.2025 18:48 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Correct.

29.01.2025 16:34 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

But it is textbook Musk/techbro etc. Used to work for Apple. You know what their internal motto is? "Burn the boats."

29.01.2025 16:33 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Cruel, certainly. I'm unpersuaded on incompetent. In any case it's a mistake to underestimate them.

29.01.2025 16:32 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

I don't think that follows. Issuing a blanket freeze followed by a bunch of waivers strikes me as a pretty efficient means of filtering for programs that actually matter to people and leaving the pork behind.

29.01.2025 02:31 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 4    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

So not a physics student, I take it.

28.01.2025 15:01 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 4    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

You think DeepFold is shitty?

28.01.2025 01:53 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Commentary in #theatlantic today to the effect that there's "zero national security reason" for the US to resume control of the Panama Canal is naive. If we control the canal, we can weaponize it: our friends get through, our enemies can go another 8000 miles and try their luck in the Drake Passage.

27.01.2025 23:17 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 1

Even though they're obviously cutting your checks?

27.01.2025 20:44 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Apparently they did. But then, appearances aren't everything.

27.01.2025 15:13 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

I assume you are referring to Russians?

27.01.2025 15:03 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 2    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Nah

27.01.2025 15:03 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

I am begging otherwise-smart people to realize that often the answer to โ€œI just saw something enraging on social media, why have I never heard about it beforeโ€ is โ€œbecause itโ€™s not true.โ€

27.01.2025 13:40 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 361    ๐Ÿ” 58    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 8    ๐Ÿ“Œ 1

Help me understand what you mean, please. I don't see what TFG has to do with this.

27.01.2025 14:58 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 2    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

@seanragan is following 16 prominent accounts