Jon P's Avatar

Jon P

@jdp23.thenexus.today

Organizer, activist, privacy advocate, strategist, software engineer ... psytrance, tarot and more. He/him they/them. Also @thenexusofprivacy.net

223 Followers  |  284 Following  |  582 Posts  |  Joined: 04.09.2025  |  1.9888

Latest posts by jdp23.thenexus.today on Bluesky

I mean you are living through an attempt at inflicting mass starvation on millions of people. This is an ELIMINATIONIST political movement. The sooner folks wake up to this, the better for all of us.

03.11.2025 16:49 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 780    ๐Ÿ” 277    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 13    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Preview
Decentralisation and blogging on atproto The space for blogging and long-form writing on atproto is rapidly developing, and it gives some interesting insight in what decentralisation on atproto looks like

an overview of the current state of blogging on atproto, and how it gives insight on what decentralisation on atproto actually looks like in practice

03.11.2025 16:25 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 47    ๐Ÿ” 11    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 6    ๐Ÿ“Œ 1

The racist SNAP videos are fake; the cop savior videos are fake. In both cases there's a call-and-response between something an audience *feels is true* and *wants to be true*; and content creators & algorithms serving that desire in spite of it being lies

What OP did is good; debunk w/o spreading

03.11.2025 02:06 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 184    ๐Ÿ” 64    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 2    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

AT service operators and moderation thinkers: I put together an early proposal around infra abuse notices across organizational boundaries.

really looking for feedback on this one, it is bait for counter-proposals and references to prior work!

02.11.2025 19:41 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 82    ๐Ÿ” 21    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 5    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Preview
PDS MOOver PDS MOOver โ€“ ATProto tools for PDS migrations and backups

New PDS MOOver update ๐Ÿฎ!

- Backups now happen every 6 hrs instead of every 24 hrs
- Frontend rewritten in SvelteKit
- New npm library to create your own PDS MOOver

Overall, the site should function mostly the same way it did before, but this setup will make future updates easier.

02.11.2025 23:31 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 43    ๐Ÿ” 8    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

An important thread thatโ€™s not simply about the University of California.

It highlights the misguided administrator-managerial thinking that has become endemic in higher education across the country.

Professors are the lifeblood of the academy.

Stop treating them like gig workers.
๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿ‘‡

02.11.2025 21:56 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 17    ๐Ÿ” 6    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Yeah, Mastodon's web interface includes this feature as well, extremely useful.

02.11.2025 06:48 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 4    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Alt text is for people with vision problems. For people who can't read the text no matter what form it appears in, who use screen readers. The alt text is needed for those. That's why it was created. Also, it's just copy and paste it's way easier than describing an image, the work is done for you

02.11.2025 04:57 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 563    ๐Ÿ” 131    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 13    ๐Ÿ“Œ 3

remember that woman who reposted the video of a journalist being arrested by ICE? when someone showed her it was AI, she said she didnโ€™t care because it was what was happening! we called her out and she didnโ€™t budge. itโ€™s a perfect example of how this shit reaffirms what people *want* to be true.

02.11.2025 02:27 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 93    ๐Ÿ” 13    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 1

OpenAI is a social arsonist.

02.11.2025 00:53 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 594    ๐Ÿ” 77    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 6    ๐Ÿ“Œ 1

Agreed, great point

02.11.2025 01:26 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

everything old is new again ...

02.11.2025 01:24 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 2    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Wow!

02.11.2025 01:23 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Yeah. And, the ability to override individuals (for labelers as well).

The frustrating thing is that composable moderation is an interesting approach but the implementation is flawed in very basic -- and fixable -- ways that have been repeatdly pointed out... but haven't been addressed.

02.11.2025 00:46 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 8    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

A general reminder. We do this for a good reason. Please read: Whitney Philips' "The Oxygen of Amplification"

01.11.2025 21:13 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 17    ๐Ÿ” 4    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Gnu Social was all-public. Lemmy is all-public.

Anyhow I'm not disagreeing about the blockchain influence on the design here, and all-public is certainly consistent with it. I just don't think "blocks are public" is a particularly strong indicator.

01.11.2025 22:07 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

The general "everything should be public" base assumption is certainly a disastrously bad one and reflects a mindset of not caring about safety or consent. Specifically with blocks, though, Mastodon wound up making the same (bad) decision so not sure it's necessarily crypto-related.

01.11.2025 21:23 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

and @dame.is for the "changed profile 500+ times yesterday" lol

01.11.2025 21:09 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

The general recommendation is to start with the framing and narrative you want to establish, then highlight the agenda of the people making the propaganda argument, before stating the actual facts. Easier said than done of course!

01.11.2025 20:15 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Yep. And it's not a controversial assessment at all with experts on propaganda and disinfo!

01.11.2025 20:13 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Yeah there's a straight line between Jay not liking continually getting hassled about not banning a certain anti-trans bigot and this functionality. Although, there's also a straight line between pro-AI people not wanting to deal with pushback and this functionality.

01.11.2025 18:57 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 7    ๐Ÿ” 1    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Yes to academic freedom against fascism.

And, as June Jordan asked, โ€œWhat freedom does this institution care about? Is it the freedom to maintain traditions based on hundreds of years of genocide, theft, rape, humiliation and hypocrisy? โ€ฆ Show me the freedom that this University upholds.โ€

01.11.2025 18:36 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 19    ๐Ÿ” 5    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

What is reality anyway?

01.11.2025 17:26 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 3    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

And also the framing is telling: "If you admit that X" certainly implies she thinks X is true.

01.11.2025 17:24 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 3    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

My perhaps controversial assessment is that when you share the propaganda of your enemies to call it out or to mock itโ€ฆ youโ€™re still spreading their propaganda and maybe doing exactly what they hope youโ€™ll do.

01.11.2025 11:52 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 4118    ๐Ÿ” 762    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 155    ๐Ÿ“Œ 99

You can read Dr. Alkhatibโ€™s paper for free:
ali-alkhatib.com/papers/chi/s...

01.11.2025 14:13 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 41    ๐Ÿ” 14    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 2    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

The protocol supports editing, so it's not actually a problem!

01.11.2025 17:10 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 2    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Hilda Bastian wrote a blog about how โ€˜A Mastodon Migration From Bluesky Would Be Differentโ€™, that got popular on the fediverse, with people highlighting the quote โ€œIโ€™m going back to the Fediverse. Back to Mastodon. To the nerds, the hobbyists, the idealists. The people who donโ€™t talk about reach, but about relevance. To those who understand that decentralization isnโ€™t nostalgic, itโ€™s the future. That digital sovereignty isnโ€™t a gimmick, itโ€™s a survival strategy. Yes, the Fediverse is sometimes clunky, nerdy, uncomfortable. But it belongs to us. Itโ€™s not over-regulated, not driven by capital, not buggered up by algorithms. Itโ€™s what social media once aspired to be: A network of people, not brands.โ€œ

What I find interesting about the quote is that it describes the self-identification of the fediverse very well. The fediverse is indeed clunky and nerdy, operated by hobbyists and idealists. Itโ€™s one of the main powers that allows the network to sustain itself for so long. But I do feel that people who highlight this in an approving manner do not really grapple with the extent these same characteristics interfere with goals to make the fediverse a mainstream platform. What makes the fediverse appealing for itโ€™s current user base is not what makes it appealing to a wide audience. Thereโ€™s an uncomfortable tension here: growth and mainstream appeal of the fediverse might just make it lose what people enjoy. Or even stronger: these same characteristics of nerdy clunkiness is also what it prevents from mainstream growth.

Hilda Bastian wrote a blog about how โ€˜A Mastodon Migration From Bluesky Would Be Differentโ€™, that got popular on the fediverse, with people highlighting the quote โ€œIโ€™m going back to the Fediverse. Back to Mastodon. To the nerds, the hobbyists, the idealists. The people who donโ€™t talk about reach, but about relevance. To those who understand that decentralization isnโ€™t nostalgic, itโ€™s the future. That digital sovereignty isnโ€™t a gimmick, itโ€™s a survival strategy. Yes, the Fediverse is sometimes clunky, nerdy, uncomfortable. But it belongs to us. Itโ€™s not over-regulated, not driven by capital, not buggered up by algorithms. Itโ€™s what social media once aspired to be: A network of people, not brands.โ€œ What I find interesting about the quote is that it describes the self-identification of the fediverse very well. The fediverse is indeed clunky and nerdy, operated by hobbyists and idealists. Itโ€™s one of the main powers that allows the network to sustain itself for so long. But I do feel that people who highlight this in an approving manner do not really grapple with the extent these same characteristics interfere with goals to make the fediverse a mainstream platform. What makes the fediverse appealing for itโ€™s current user base is not what makes it appealing to a wide audience. Thereโ€™s an uncomfortable tension here: growth and mainstream appeal of the fediverse might just make it lose what people enjoy. Or even stronger: these same characteristics of nerdy clunkiness is also what it prevents from mainstream growth.

this weeks fediverse news

connectedplaces.online/reports/fedi...

01.11.2025 14:54 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 47    ๐Ÿ” 12    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 4    ๐Ÿ“Œ 4

(Clears throat)

Well, actually, the term "algorithm" -- named after its inventor, Al Gore -- includes any *decision* process. So in reality, Bluesky has had an algorithm ever since JACK DORSEY initially *decided* to fund it.

In this thread I shall ... (1/297)

01.11.2025 06:40 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 19    ๐Ÿ” 4    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 2    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Sorry your day has been so shitty ... but glad I could help a little!

01.11.2025 16:53 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

@jdp23.thenexus.today is following 20 prominent accounts