Mina

Bloodthirsty Pam wants to see more kids die.

Thank you Senator!

I swore an oath to the Constitution in 1986. I've upheld it through 25 years of service and every day since I retired.

If Trump's trying to intimidate me, it won’t work. I’ve given too much to our country to be silenced by bullies who care more about power than the Constitution.

Sociopaths. I hope the judge has their names.

Bessent is awful on TV, that has to driving Trump nuts.

This is identical to Russia invading Ukraine. Illegally invading a country for their resources and likely killing thousands—if not more—is immoral and should not be supported by anyone with any shred of moral conscience.

Can you imagine if Ilhan Omar were using her office to push US soldiers in to Somalia? That’s not how this is supposed to work!

good work guys you picked a fight in which Dems can stand up out of their permanent defensive crouch and go “our guy is a fucking astronaut and you’re an alcoholic tv host”

Kick him when he’s down! Exploit every single misstep.

ICE agent when told he's about to arrest a US citizen. Direct quote: "I DON'T CARE."

Ohh boy. It's like Iraq without any pretexts

from "the pro peace ticket" to "we're invading venezuela to steal their oil" in just about 12 month

Looks like it’s about to peel off in sheets 🤮

I wear jeans and a sweater when flying but I’m sorely tempted to switch to sweats now. I resent being told what to wear.

This woman is unhinged. She comes on at least once a week to demand war.

Their focus is clearly on intimidating whistleblowers and not on public opinion, which will continue to spiral

They’re going after Dems reminding the military of their oaths because:

1) they know the orders are illegal
2) they’re extremely worried military officers will listen

Comey: "I'm grateful the court ended the case against me, which was a prosecution based on malevolence & incompetence... I was inspired by the career people who refused to be part of this travesty. It cost some of them their jobs, but it preserved their integrity, which is beyond price"

You lost Caroline!

She was going strong with her regime propaganda lol how embarrassing

@PeteHegseth on X: The video made by the “Seditious Six” was despicable, reckless, and false. Encouraging our warriors to ignore the orders of their Commanders undermines every aspect of “good order and discipline.” Their foolish screed sows doubt and confusion — which only puts our warriors in danger. Five of the six individuals in that video do not fall under @DeptofWar jurisdiction (one is CIA and four are former military but not “retired”, so they are no longer subject to UCMJ). However, Mark Kelly (retired Navy Commander) is still subject to UCMJ—and he knows that. As was announced, the Department is reviewing his statements and actions, which were addressed directly to all troops while explicitly using his rank and service affiliation—lending the appearance of authority to his words. Kelly’s conduct brings discredit upon the armed forces and will be addressed appropriately. 24 Nov 25

This is likely unlawful command influence

Didn’t he cancel the policy where airlines had to reimburse?

AI still working on it

The case of a felon who paid lobbyists nearly $1 million to seek a Trump pardon Nursing home magnate Joseph Schwartz was sentenced in April to three years for defrauding the government of $38 million. Seven months later, Trump pardoned him, but the White House denies a lobbying t...

Nursing home magnate Joseph Schwartz was sentenced in April to three years for defrauding the government of $38 million.

Seven months later, President Trump pardoned him, but the White House denies a lobbying tie.

Sen. Mark Kelly has released a statement.

"If this is meant to intimidate me and other members of Congress from doing our jobs and holding this administration accountable, it won't work. I've given too much to this country to be silenced by bullies..."

Is Trump giving illegal orders?

That’s what we need reporters to find out.

So we are currently at multiple threatened military operations, attorneys being rejected for improper appointments, suburbanites chasing the armed agents of the state cursing their names, a two vote margin in the house, and consumer sentiment worse than 2008/2009. It’s been less than a year.

So it’s logical to conclude that they are giving, or plan to give, illegal orders. That’s the reason for the panic, right?

Then we need a public conversation about legal versus illegal orders.

BLITZER: I want to be precise. Should members of the US military obey clearly illegal orders?

McCLAIN: You're asking an enlisted person for their opinion on what they think is legal. That's a pretty slippery slope. Follow your commander in chief. That's the oath that you took



(Not a no!)