's Avatar

@keja.bsky.social

379 Followers  |  2,718 Following  |  222 Posts  |  Joined: 29.08.2023  |  3.2138

Latest posts by keja.bsky.social on Bluesky

Can you tell where the latency is coming from?

25.11.2025 22:16 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I'm sure this is the only issue like that though, right

25.11.2025 04:24 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

In other words

23.11.2025 18:14 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Tiktok/Instagram is different from Facebook in various ways. Also idk if teens is the age group of primary interest. So I'm not sure.

22.11.2025 22:38 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Are you asking for an example of a secret that hasn't leaked? :-)

22.11.2025 19:54 β€” πŸ‘ 11    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

The literature is bad?

21.11.2025 01:10 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Could you elaborate on "Accountable PUCs"?

18.11.2025 01:35 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Cheers

17.11.2025 23:49 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Yeah ok I see where you're at.

17.11.2025 23:47 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I see, yes, that's true.

17.11.2025 23:45 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Under communism or whatever, if people benefit from taking stuff from the state for personal gain, there still needs to be a way to keep them from doing that, right?

17.11.2025 23:43 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Oops I messed up the threading

17.11.2025 23:40 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Of course, there are other products at stores. Soap, toilet paper, and carrots will also be taken. So we won't be able to buy those? This is becoming a problem. How are we going to solve this?

17.11.2025 23:39 β€” πŸ‘ 6    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Yes. So if we follow your proposal of having no police, then that's off the table.

But then people will take all the sunglasses, and stores will not be able to sell sunglasses and we will not be able to buy sunglasses at stores. That's a loss, but a small one; I don't really need sunglasses.

17.11.2025 23:39 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Yes. So if we follow your proposal of having no police, then that's off the table.

But then people will take all the sunglasses, and stores will not be able to sell sunglasses and we will not be able to buy sunglasses at stores. That's a loss, but a small one; I don't really sunglasses.

17.11.2025 23:36 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

So the storekeepers can hire an organization to physically detain anybody taking product and deter future takings by threat of long-term detention in a facility dedicated to this purpose.

This arrangement would be preferable to having police?

17.11.2025 23:30 β€” πŸ‘ 6    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Permitted by you, in the arrangement you're imagining and proposing.

17.11.2025 23:24 β€” πŸ‘ 6    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

What measures should the storekeeper be permitted to take in order to retrieve the sunglasses? Physically detaining the person? Searching their body?

Can the storekeeper hire an organization to perform these functions?

What measures are permitted in order to deter future taking of sunglasses?

17.11.2025 23:22 β€” πŸ‘ 6    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

What should happen when somebody takes sunglasses from a store without paying for them?

17.11.2025 23:14 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

The arithmetic comes out the same for me. I'm not sure where the 0.3 Wh number comes from, though it seems to be the accepted value.

14.11.2025 04:49 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Isn't BC pretty rainy? I wouldn't think it's hurting for water. Eyeballing the timeline I'm not seeing much recent "drought" either. vancouver.weatherstats.ca/charts/preci...

14.11.2025 01:06 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I think the source interview gives a better narrative

www.japanfs.org/en/news/arch...

10.11.2025 20:44 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
The Two Cultures - Wikipedia

Reminds me of en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Two...

10.11.2025 20:16 β€” πŸ‘ 6    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

My impression is that climate science used to have a lot more uncertainty about the downside risks than it does now, and apocalyptic concerns made more sense 20 years ago.

We're still at the beginning for AI safety; with so little information it's hard to rule out very bad outcomes.

10.11.2025 20:11 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Can you recommend any work that has studied this question?

10.11.2025 00:04 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I suppose that's right for most models. Though I do wonder how well an LLM specifically trained to pass the Turing test would do.

27.10.2025 20:34 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Also any long supply chain

27.08.2025 23:36 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Does any tall chain of command match this pattern?

27.08.2025 22:57 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

I'd be curious about attendance rates

24.08.2025 05:20 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

In equilibrium he would get that skincare routine

20.08.2025 23:23 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

@keja is following 20 prominent accounts