It's not weird at all. Melania's just helping an old buddy from the Epstein days.
You would think that Bezos and the Trumps would know better. The truth is that they don't care.
@bds77.bsky.social
Historian. Islanders/Yankees fan. Opinions are my own. Has it ever been otherwise?
It's not weird at all. Melania's just helping an old buddy from the Epstein days.
You would think that Bezos and the Trumps would know better. The truth is that they don't care.
Trump's beginning to learn that some of his puppies in office need to be house-trained.
Going to war with the American people never works out well.
Meaning that the consequences are that it's okay for such federal agents to act like the Brown Shirts and Gestapo?
25.01.2026 23:29 β π 4 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Today's essay question:
Is the Trump turn in American foreign policy a repudiation of US foreign policy principles or their logical cumulative expression?
The Trump Doctrine: Extortion by a Bully.
21.01.2026 14:41 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0So ... can you win a land war in Greenland?
And if so, so what?
I used to think Andrew Johnson was our worst president.
Used to.
It is surreal. Yet somehow I am not surprised. Neither are you.
14.01.2026 23:47 β π 2 π 1 π¬ 1 π 0We've gone from the bully pulpit to simply being a bully.
11.01.2026 17:00 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Wait until Speaker Mike Johnson says he has not seen the video of the ICE agent murdering a woman in Minneapolis, so he cannot comment.
07.01.2026 20:56 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0For anyone interested in the American Civil War ...
www.youtube.com/watch?v=hFlJ...
On January 6, 2021, Republicans accepted and defended what they opposed between 1861 and 1865.
Never forget.
The threat remains. If anything, it's worse.
I wonder how many pro-Trump neoConfederates who attack Lincoln's actions in the Fort Sumter crisis are celebrating Trump's actions today.
03.01.2026 15:45 β π 4 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0I would encourage the president to follow his own path on this matter, which is a clear demonstration of his superior performance on cognitive tests.
02.01.2026 21:22 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Erika Kirk teaches us all how to move on.
29.12.2025 15:27 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0I have heard that you don't trade him.
26.12.2025 21:25 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Dust jackets can conceal what you are really reading.
07.12.2025 18:37 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0And yes, it was Sadat at Gettysburg. Misspoke.
07.12.2025 17:17 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Fame takes many forms.
www.thepoke.com/2025/12/04/w...
Their followers believe what they say. The question is how many voters who supported Trump are open to empirical evidence and experience.
So much lying.
Could you be a little more specific? Best about what? π
22.11.2025 18:53 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0If you think that the military history of the Civil War is simply a story of generals and battles, you haven't kept up with the literature.
For decades.
At best, it's ignorance. At worst, it's insulting.
It's also sooooo yesterday.
Slob.
22.11.2025 06:09 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0It smacks of a self-congratulatory assessment resting on the construction of strawmen. Just doesn't come across well.
But clearly it has our attention.
Should it?
The other thing that strikes me as odd about this exchange is that it sounds like an academic conference. I've given this lecture ... as a lecture, alone ... and I thought the idea was to bring some historical insight to a broader audience. Gatekeeping? Really? Whatever. Who cares about infighting?
22.11.2025 06:06 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0I guess I don't follow this line of discussion. There's a lot of stereotyping hiding behind a refusal to name names. This sort of thing tells me more about the people making the arguments and how they view things than it does about whatever is being described.
22.11.2025 03:50 β π 5 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Jim Downs's assertion in this regard is ... interesting.
What I notice is how non-military historians of the ACW sometimes flaunt their ignorance of military issues, often to their detriment.
Maybe Jim needs to read more.
Fight like it's 1846.
20.11.2025 21:00 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0