Americaβs lowest-paid workers are suffering a sharper slowdown in wage growth than their richer peers, adding to the pressure on Donald Trump over inequality https://on.ft.com/3UbHZ3u
04.08.2025 03:35 β π 102 π 48 π¬ 10 π 6@kylemeng.com.bsky.social
Professor at UCSB Bren School and Econ Dept. Climate and Energy Director at emLab. Former White House CEA Senior Climate Economist. Associate at @nber.org @csis.org. Board member @ucsusa.bsky.social. Personal views. www.kylemeng.com
Americaβs lowest-paid workers are suffering a sharper slowdown in wage growth than their richer peers, adding to the pressure on Donald Trump over inequality https://on.ft.com/3UbHZ3u
04.08.2025 03:35 β π 102 π 48 π¬ 10 π 6What to make of POTUS's attempt to fire the Commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS)?
Let's run down what knowledgable people are saying...
Those are not βherβ (BLS Commissionerβs) numbers. Theyβre constructed by career civil servants using data collected from thousands of businesses and government agencies.
04.08.2025 03:12 β π 56 π 5 π¬ 4 π 1Is sea level around the US accelerating? If you actually do the analysis, instead of just repeating talking points from decades ago, the answer is yes.
tamino.wordpress.com/2025/08/03/s...
Trump Fired Americaβs Economic Data Collector. History Shows the Perils.
www.nytimes.com/2025/08/03/b...
Columbiaβs Administrators Are Fooling Themselves www.nytimes.com/2025/07/23/o...
24.07.2025 14:30 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0@mikegeruso.bsky.social and Dean Spears' book After the Spike is out!
One of the most thoughtful and thought-provoking books on population out there.
Our paper is officially out π
We argue that climate clubs show promise:
- A climate club with coordinated penalties could curb 68% of excess emissions from free-riding
-Unilateral carbon tariffs? Not nearly as effective
The most binding changes to Medicaid won't occur until at least December of next year, after the midterms. Politics has a short memory, but we don't.Β
Jared Bernstein and Elena Patel on the long-term impacts of the BBB.
"Trump and his team have focused on reducing trade deficits in negotiations with many other nations, and his letter to Brazil references trade deficits as a national security threat, despite the fact that the U.S. runs a surplus with the country."
10.07.2025 00:05 β π 1 π 3 π¬ 0 π 0My Sac Bee op-ed on how reauthorizing California's cap-and-trade program can help lower household electricity prices across the state.
#energysky #climatesky
A must read substack for anyone interested in CA gas prices.
Many have seen this "CA gas prices will hit $8/gal" study floating around.
Ryan Cummings, my Biden CEA colleague and one of the sharpest thinkers on oil markets, takes this study to task.
And it doesn't stand up well...
#energysky
I agree with all of Kyleβs critiques and would add 2 more:
1. The piece cites Australia and Canada as countries where voters rejected carbon prices, but thatβs not true. In AUS itβs called a βsafeguard mechanismβ and was put in place in 2023. CAN kept the price for industries the focus of the piece
If you give out the carrot now, do we really think industry will come back later and ask for the stick?
The whole point of the carbon tariff is to make the stick of regulation more attractive.
You give that up and we've weakened incentives to adopt domestic climate regulation. /n
Finally, do we really think a carbon tariff now will make adoption of serious domestic climate policy more likely in the future?
Carbon tariffs are a carrot for industry. We normally think of that going together with the stick of domestic regulation as part of a single negotiation. 7/
Authors' cite a RFF study implying you can have your cake and eat it too. But the RFF study, which uses a GE model and so has trade effects, finds 5 year revenue of ~17B, not $198B! 6/
24.06.2025 07:15 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0And isn't the point of carbon tariffs to lower demand for dirty foreign goods by importing less of it?
In other words, you can't have both high tariff revenue and high GHG reductions. Same with protection of domestic industries. Sides of the same coin. 5/
What about US govt revenue?
Authors' cite their calculation that FPFA raises $198B over 5 years.
But their accounting exercise makes a crucial assumption: trade volumes don't change under carbon tariffs.
FPFA increase tariffs on some goods by 100%!
Will imports really not fall? 4/
Look at iron/steel. This scatter from my upcoming paper plots country GHG intensities vs U.S. import penetration for iron/steel.
PRC imports serves <2% of U.S. consumption. And PRC consumes 94% of own iron/steel.
So trade too little for U.S. carbon tariffs to have much leverage. 3/
Let's start with PRC competition.
Yes, Chinese production is dirtier than the U.S.
But for a carbon tariffs to work, U.S. must be import dependent on dirty PRC imports. And the PRC must be export dependent.
That's not the case. 2/
This Op-Ed on a U.S. carbon tariff gets lots of basic stuff wrong.
Unlike authors' claims, a U.S. carbon tariff
1. Won't address PRC competition
2. Either raises lots of revenue or lowers GHGs (not both)
3. Weakens incentives to adopt domestic U.S. climate policy. π§΅ 1/
#econsky #climatesky
I hope some Senate aides read our new briefer on China battery and mineral supply chain dependencies before altering IRA rules on Section 30D or 45X. Losing local content incentives and overly restrictive FEOC rules would be a huge mistake. councilonstrategicrisks.org/2025/05/30/t...
30.05.2025 13:42 β π 21 π 8 π¬ 0 π 2The Senate Finance committee just dropped their draft text for the Republican budget bill. www.finance.senate.gov/chairmans-ne...
Like the House, it is hot trash and terrible for America. But it is marginally better for clean energy credits. Some key details... ππ‘ ππ
Batteries are a critical technology for the 21st century and one which the U.S. must be globally competitive in.
We are already several years behind the PRC in battery manufacturing. And will only fall further behind under current policy trajectory.
Our @voxeu.org article on our Cape Town Day Zero paper. When adaptation to climate change has equity consequences through how public utilities recover costs.
#EconSky #ClimateSky
I remember when the term βframeworkβ was used to refer to an international agreement over not much. Now itβs βhandshake for a framework.β
11.06.2025 04:21 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0An excellent NYT Daily podcast about how 15 years of inconsistent start-stop U.S. industrial policy has kept us vulnerable on rare earths.
10.06.2025 16:14 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Clever California legislation back during Trump 1.
www.politico.com/story/2018/0...
πͺπͺπͺ
07.06.2025 05:12 β π 4 π 1 π¬ 0 π 0