Big thanks to an amazing team: Zeb Nicholls, @carlschleussner.bsky.social, @setupelz.bsky.social, @romanhoffmann.bsky.social
07.05.2025 15:02 β π 5 π 1 π¬ 0 π 0@sarahschoengart.bsky.social
Big thanks to an amazing team: Zeb Nicholls, @carlschleussner.bsky.social, @setupelz.bsky.social, @romanhoffmann.bsky.social
07.05.2025 15:02 β π 5 π 1 π¬ 0 π 0More broadly, our analysis supports the idea that wealthy individuals should contribute a lot more to help those suffering the most from climate impacts. 7/
07.05.2025 15:02 β π 4 π 2 π¬ 1 π 0Our findings suggest that policies targeting the emissions and investments of the wealthiest could have a big impact on reducing climate change. They also strengthen the case for progressive climate policies that hold high emitters accountable. 6/
07.05.2025 15:02 β π 5 π 4 π¬ 1 π 0Lastly, our approach allows us to also quantify transboundary impacts of wealthy emitters. For example, the emissions of the wealthiest 10% of US Americans and Chinese each led to a. 2-3 fold increase in heat extremes across vulnerable regions. 5/
07.05.2025 15:02 β π 2 π 1 π¬ 1 π 0These wealthy groups contributed much more to dangerous heat and drought events than the average personβup to 26 times more for the top 1% when it comes to extreme heat globally. And up to 17 times (top 1%) more to Amazon droughts. 4/
07.05.2025 15:02 β π 2 π 1 π¬ 1 π 0The richest 10% of people worldwide contributed to about two-thirds of global warming since 1990, and the top 1% alone about one-fifth. If the entire world had emitted like the bottom 50%, there would have been minimal warming since 1990. Lot more in there (check out this figure) π
3/
So what did we do? We combine wealth-based GHG inequality assessments from @wid.world and @lucaschancel.bsky.social with an emulator modelling framework to systematically attribute changes in global temperature and grid-cell-level climate extremes to emissions from different wealth groups. 2/
07.05.2025 15:02 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0New study on linking wealth-based emissions to climate impacts: We find that 2/3 of global warming is attributable to the wealthiest 10% and so are climate extremes.
Article: www.nature.com/articles/s41...
@iiasa.ac.at, @usyseth.bsky.social
1/
π°π Research by Sarah SchΓΆngart et al. shows the wealthiest 10% caused TWO-THIRDS of global warming since 1990. The top 1% have an even bigger impact on extreme weather like #heatwaves and #droughts, hitting vulnerable regions hardest.
usys.ethz.ch/en/news-even...
NEW β Two-thirds of global warming since 1990 caused by worldβs βwealthiest 10%β
βοΈ by @ayeshatandon.carbonbrief.org
π¬ with comment from Sarah SchΓΆngart @carlschleussner.bsky.social @zscheischlerjak.bsky.social @wimthiery.bsky.social
Read here β‘οΈ buff.ly/0Se78bM
π The wealthiest 10% of the global population have been responsible for two-thirds of global warming since 1990, according to new research published in Nature Climate Change.
Read more π iiasa.ac.at/news/may-202...
@carlschleussner.bsky.social @ethzurich.bsky.social