's Avatar

@sarahschoengart.bsky.social

58 Followers  |  40 Following  |  8 Posts  |  Joined: 07.05.2025  |  1.6071

Latest posts by sarahschoengart.bsky.social on Bluesky

Big thanks to an amazing team: Zeb Nicholls, @carlschleussner.bsky.social, @setupelz.bsky.social, @romanhoffmann.bsky.social

07.05.2025 15:02 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

More broadly, our analysis supports the idea that wealthy individuals should contribute a lot more to help those suffering the most from climate impacts. 7/

07.05.2025 15:02 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Our findings suggest that policies targeting the emissions and investments of the wealthiest could have a big impact on reducing climate change. They also strengthen the case for progressive climate policies that hold high emitters accountable. 6/

07.05.2025 15:02 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 4    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Lastly, our approach allows us to also quantify transboundary impacts of wealthy emitters. For example, the emissions of the wealthiest 10% of US Americans and Chinese each led to a. 2-3 fold increase in heat extremes across vulnerable regions. 5/

07.05.2025 15:02 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

These wealthy groups contributed much more to dangerous heat and drought events than the average personβ€”up to 26 times more for the top 1% when it comes to extreme heat globally. And up to 17 times (top 1%) more to Amazon droughts. 4/

07.05.2025 15:02 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

The richest 10% of people worldwide contributed to about two-thirds of global warming since 1990, and the top 1% alone about one-fifth. If the entire world had emitted like the bottom 50%, there would have been minimal warming since 1990. Lot more in there (check out this figure) πŸ‘‡
3/

07.05.2025 15:02 β€” πŸ‘ 9    πŸ” 7    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 1
Post image

So what did we do? We combine wealth-based GHG inequality assessments from @wid.world and @lucaschancel.bsky.social with an emulator modelling framework to systematically attribute changes in global temperature and grid-cell-level climate extremes to emissions from different wealth groups. 2/

07.05.2025 15:02 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

New study on linking wealth-based emissions to climate impacts: We find that 2/3 of global warming is attributable to the wealthiest 10% and so are climate extremes.
Article: www.nature.com/articles/s41...
@iiasa.ac.at, @usyseth.bsky.social
1/

07.05.2025 15:02 β€” πŸ‘ 33    πŸ” 21    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 3
Post image

πŸ’°πŸŒ Research by Sarah SchΓΆngart et al. shows the wealthiest 10% caused TWO-THIRDS of global warming since 1990. The top 1% have an even bigger impact on extreme weather like #heatwaves and #droughts, hitting vulnerable regions hardest.

usys.ethz.ch/en/news-even...

07.05.2025 09:34 β€” πŸ‘ 38    πŸ” 15    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 2
Post image

NEW – Two-thirds of global warming since 1990 caused by world’s β€˜wealthiest 10%’

✍️ by @ayeshatandon.carbonbrief.org

πŸ’¬ with comment from Sarah SchΓΆngart @carlschleussner.bsky.social @zscheischlerjak.bsky.social @wimthiery.bsky.social

Read here ➑️ buff.ly/0Se78bM

07.05.2025 10:38 β€” πŸ‘ 81    πŸ” 42    πŸ’¬ 5    πŸ“Œ 7
Post image

🌎 The wealthiest 10% of the global population have been responsible for two-thirds of global warming since 1990, according to new research published in Nature Climate Change.
Read more πŸ”— iiasa.ac.at/news/may-202...
@carlschleussner.bsky.social @ethzurich.bsky.social

07.05.2025 11:02 β€” πŸ‘ 8    πŸ” 6    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

@sarahschoengart is following 20 prominent accounts