The hysterical, hyperbolic and libellous responses to this lie are actually hilarious. It's almost as if gender ideologues can't distinguish lies from reality ๐ค
03.02.2026 22:26 โ ๐ 3 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0@fionagraph.bsky.social
Lesbian, feminist. Just lurking ... https://linktr.ee/fgraph
The hysterical, hyperbolic and libellous responses to this lie are actually hilarious. It's almost as if gender ideologues can't distinguish lies from reality ๐ค
03.02.2026 22:26 โ ๐ 3 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0It's not a good look to react so defensively to a mildly critical review. The reviewer makes some reasonable comments. It makes you appear childish and over-sensitive. Writers need to be able to take on a range of views and learn from it. Learn from this and broaden your rather blinkered outlook
24.01.2026 18:29 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0A) science and biology are not 'fringe views', HTH
B) what you call 'lawfare' is the attempt to have basic rights recognised and upheld. Any trans person is free to also use the law for this reason
C) authoritarian attempts to deny free speech by violence or intimidation should be a concern for all
Oh 'kind and empathetic person' - virtue-signalling, moi?
www.psypost.org/narcissistic...
I'm sure they'll be devastated to be refused attendance at your very important Pride that has been going for all of, ooh, one year.
BTW, 'anti-trans' means 'pro-women's rights'. But you know that ๐ค
Someone forgot the pram ... in the cemetery ๐ฎ
06.11.2025 12:29 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0You want me to block you because you can't deal with hearing another viewpoint? What are you, seven? Have you tried sticking your fingers in your ears and going 'la la la'? ๐คก
05.11.2025 10:33 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0You've already shown you are not acting in good faith by your ad hominem attacks on a senior academic. This is nothing to do with me or what I think; I won't play your games. You need to explain yourself to her
04.11.2025 21:48 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0How is she a 'shitty person? How about you engage with the substance of her comments?
04.11.2025 20:57 โ ๐ 4 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0There is nothing rude about her email. Do you really think you're the good guy here, and you come well out of this? ๐ค
04.11.2025 20:56 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0BBC News - Pride group founder jailed for rape of boy, 12
www.bbc.com/news/article...
Why did you get a lesbian journalist thrown out for asking questions? Homophobic, no?Why are you supporting Pride in Surrey, which was co-founded by convicted child rapist Stephen Ireland, and is now run by two of his former boyfriends? Don't you think you should support an investigation into PiS?
07.09.2025 07:31 โ ๐ 12 ๐ 2 ๐ฌ 2 ๐ 0Teddy bear in trouble?
28.08.2025 08:57 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0How you don't see that "trans women are women' is an incoherent, regressive ideology that destroys women's rights; destroys the right to claim same-sex attraction and association; and results in young people being medically and psychically harmed, is quite puzzling
25.08.2025 14:14 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0It's quite creepy how you insist on mansplaining to women about the proper way to be a feminist. I've been an active feminist for decades but no, you know better. A man telling women how to do feminism > a perfect analogy of patriarchy as well as gender ideology (men can be better 'women')
20.08.2025 14:30 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0It's not about excluding trans, it's about rejecting the ideology. It's about acknowledging reality. 'Trans women are women' renders 'woman' a meaningless category. And if you can't define women, you can't protect women's rights. Gender identity should never trump sex. Why can't they just be trans!
20.08.2025 07:45 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0And, as a lesbian, I've been involved in LGB and feminist activism since 1979. A gay man's lived experience under patriarchy has been hard, I understand that. It can be allied with feminism but it cannot be part of feminism. I have dear gay friends; I have also suffered appalling sexism from gay men
19.08.2025 17:23 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Yeah, mate, I researched and wrote a book about LGB lives post WWII. And you know nothing about feminism! I'm sure you'll continue to lecture me about it while believing earnestly in 'lived experience' for non-females. Perhaps look up the term 'mansplaining' ๐
19.08.2025 16:33 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0PS the 1950s were worse for women and lesbians, bound by rigid sex role stereotypes and lacking full rights. Gender ideology is returning us to those times
19.08.2025 16:01 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 2 ๐ 0Where is the proof that GC feminism is a 'small sliver' of the movement? Are you an expert? Are you involved in feminist groups? Feminism centres women's rights, and has nothing to do with men's rights. If men can 'feel' like women, then 'woman' ceases to exist as a category along with our rights
19.08.2025 15:59 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Oh, a man is telling me about feminism? How unusual ๐ค. And how boring. Well, gender ideology is concentrated misogyny and homophobia, along with 1950s ideas of sex role stereotypes and a ludicrous incoherence that does not stand up to scrutiny
19.08.2025 15:35 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0A) I'm not saying they MUST publish all such books, but if they make a blanket statement that they will NEVER publish books from GC authors, that is discrimination on the basis of belief; B) GC ('terf') beliefs do not call for 'suppression or eradication of people' - ridiculous hyperbolic lies ๐
19.08.2025 15:31 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0If you don't publish a book because it's bad, that's not censorship. If you don't publish a book because of the author's 'thought crimes' (beliefs which, BTW, are protected under EA2010), yes, that's censorship. Use your brain: where does this authoritarian punishment of free speech end up? HTH
19.08.2025 10:57 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0That'sa lie! Women and LGB groups are trying to claw back the rights stolen from us thanks to gender ideology. Trans people still have full protection under EA2010. Why does no one care that women and lesbians have lost our single-sex spaces?
19.08.2025 07:51 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0So you're proudly admitting to practising censorship? You think authoritarianism and McCarthyism is the way to go?
19.08.2025 07:42 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Nothing to do with a 'pile on'! If that's how you interpret a valid, point of view, then I feel sorry for you. Use your critical faculties and look at the evidence, FGS. You say It's not your battle: then listen to the lived experience of those affected by this incoherent, authoritarian ideology
15.08.2025 19:05 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Oh yeah? Heard about Katie Dolatowski? Heard about girls in school toilets bring sexually assaulted?
www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-engl...
It's already my rights that I've lost: as a woman (right to same-sex spaces, including prisons and sport), as a lesbian (right to meet in female same-sex attracted spaces). But I suspect you don't care about that ๐ค
15.08.2025 18:51 โ ๐ 3 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Defamation or libel do not count as free speech. Happy to help
15.08.2025 18:46 โ ๐ 3 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0You're being disingenuous. You suggested people get the books for political or activist reasons, not for the quality of the writing. You have made art subservient to activism and that's a very slippery slope. You 'have a great day' too (I can spot passive-aggression, you know) ๐ค
11.08.2025 21:08 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0