andrew trask's Avatar

andrew trask

@trask.bsky.social

lawyer & adjunct law prof πŸ“DC/ALX https://sites.google.com/view/andrewtrask/disclaimer

1,148 Followers  |  653 Following  |  200 Posts  |  Joined: 08.06.2023  |  1.7511

Latest posts by trask.bsky.social on Bluesky

Maybe you bought it and then forgot about it? I do that with Amazon orders sometimes.

17.01.2025 20:34 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

There’s a (currently unoccupied) hot tub on the deck of the one on the right. Just sayin.

17.01.2025 20:30 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

The prior owner of the 818 was reportedly Howard Shultz of Starbucks, who then sold it to an unnamed buyer (who, again, was not me)

17.01.2025 20:28 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

❀️

17.01.2025 20:26 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

(Neither one is mine, to be clear)

17.01.2025 19:45 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

I’m assuming the appearance this week of two yachts at DC’s Wharf is inauguration related?

17.01.2025 19:33 β€” πŸ‘ 18    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
a close up of a man 's face with a beard ALT: a close up of a man 's face with a beard
08.01.2025 01:13 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Swag from my in-house days still going strong πŸ’ͺ

30.12.2024 13:31 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Conch shells arranged together on the beach

Conch shells arranged together on the beach

It’s a conch-catenation.

25.12.2024 23:19 β€” πŸ‘ 6    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Brunch adult DCA’s new Capital One lounge

Brunch adult DCA’s new Capital One lounge

As if I needed another reason to ❀️ DCA, the new Capital One lounge is pretty excellent

22.12.2024 16:40 β€” πŸ‘ 13    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Well there are too many banks to choose from in Old Town but that doesn’t stop the city council from adding more :)

21.12.2024 15:03 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Fabulous issue as usual but this Old Town Oligarch might have added the TD Bank debate to the discourse rankings

21.12.2024 14:58 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

But please do report back tomorrow. For science.

21.12.2024 01:52 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

In that case all bets are off, Joe.

21.12.2024 01:51 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Ouch 😬

21.12.2024 01:46 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Interviewer: Can you explain this gap in your resume?

Graphic designer: *sigh* It’s kerning.

21.12.2024 00:20 β€” πŸ‘ 62    πŸ” 7    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 3

Interviewer: Can you explain this gap in your resume?

IT worker: That’s when I was turning it off and then back on again.

21.12.2024 00:43 β€” πŸ‘ 20    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 2

πŸ’―

21.12.2024 01:44 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Liquor before beer, in the clear.

21.12.2024 01:41 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Interviewer: Can you explain this gap in your resume?

Government lawyer with clearance: β–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆ the β–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆ except β–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆ wombat exclusion β–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆ.

20.12.2024 21:32 β€” πŸ‘ 10    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 1

Interviewer: Can you explain this gap in your resume?

Patent lawyer: It’s a β€œcomprising” resume.

20.12.2024 19:27 β€” πŸ‘ 7    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

πŸ”₯

20.12.2024 19:23 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Interviewer: Can you explain this gap in your resume?

Government lawyer: No, that explanation is exempt from disclosure under 5 U.S.C. Β§ 552(b)(2) and (b)(6).

20.12.2024 19:17 β€” πŸ‘ 621    πŸ” 34    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 8

Interviewer: Can you explain this gap in your resume?

Appellate lawyer: The deadline for my next job wasn’t jurisdictional.

20.12.2024 18:52 β€” πŸ‘ 343    πŸ” 10    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 4

Sadly, a newly opened bookstore in Old Town had a serious fire.
alexandrialivingmagazine.com/business/thr...

06.12.2024 02:27 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Ugh, that’s sad. It’s been a rough few weeks for ALX bookstores.

05.12.2024 20:50 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

They generally adhere to that rule but sometimes break it (I believe) when a portion of the court is sitting in a non-DC location.

05.12.2024 20:48 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

The Fed. Cir. IOPs define β€œMerits Panel” as β€œthree or more judges.”

That said I am not aware of the court constituting a panel of more than three judges in recent memory.

05.12.2024 20:46 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

@trask is following 20 prominent accounts