π€π€ for all the ones who didnβt make the night π€π€
23.04.2025 20:56 β π 6 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0@tomstorvik.me.bsky.social
β½ Agent | Producer π¬ π€ NUFC π€ π³π΄ Norwegian | https://linktr.ee/tomstorvik
π€π€ for all the ones who didnβt make the night π€π€
23.04.2025 20:56 β π 6 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0We must repel the dying light ππΌ
04.04.2025 07:09 β π 6 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Imposter syndrome on social sites like bsky is annoyingly real. Stuck endlessly looping this pattern:
1) Open bsky
2) Scroll feed
3) Stare at the 'New Post' button like it's judging me
4) Tell yourself: "you're not special, who'd care what you'd post?"
5) Close bsky
Repeat ad infinitum π«₯
The reasoning for applying a 15+ app cut-off... π
1. Holland - 1 in 84
2. Slimani - 1 in 130
3. Robinson - 1 in 162
4. Jeffrey - 1 in 171
5. Asprilla - 1 in 186
6. Armstrong - 1 in 233
7. Carroll - 1 in 243
8. Viana - 1 in 270
9. Marveux - 1 in 276
10. Kelly - 1 in 298
11..... Xisco - 1 in 304
Which means Murphy slots in at #11 of all NUFC players in the PL era with 15+ appearances when it comes to assists per minute on the pitch! Numbers don't lie, Murphy's very much underrated by pundits and fans alike... π
26.01.2025 00:53 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0PL Assist/Min rank (excl sub-15 app players)
1. Asprilla - 1 in 186
2. Carroll - 1 in 243
3. Viana - 1 in 270
4. Marveux - 1 in 276
5. Sellars - 1 in 305
6. Solano - 1 in 326
7. Cole - 1 in 326
8. Fox - 1 in 328
9. Robert - 1 in 331
10. Gordon - 1 in 344
11. Murphy - 1 in 357
12. Ginola - 1 in 357
Looked at number of minutes per Assist for the players listed, this would be the ranking based on that:
1. Solano - 1/326β¨
2. Robert - 1/331β¨
3. Murphy - 1/357β¨
4. Beardsley - 1/429β¨
5. GuimΓ£res - 1/452β¨
6. Ritche - 1/550β¨
7. Dyer - 1/573β¨
8. Lee - 1/722β¨
9. Shearer - 1/730β¨
10. Ameobi - 1/737
PL Assist/Min rank (excl sub-15 app players)
1. Asprilla - 1 in 186
2. Carroll - 1 in 243
3. Viana - 1 in 270
4. Marveux - 1 in 276
5. Sellars - 1 in 305
6. Solano - 1 in 326
7. Cole - 1 in 326
8. Fox - 1 in 328
9. Robert - 1 in 331
10. Gordon - 1 in 344
11. Murphy - 1 in 357
12. Ginola - 1 in 357
Looked at number of minutes per Assist for the players listed, this would be the ranking based on that:
1. Solano - 1/326β¨
2. Robert - 1/331β¨
3. Murphy - 1/357β¨
4. Beardsley - 1/429β¨
5. GuimΓ£res - 1/452β¨
6. Ritche - 1/550β¨
7. Dyer - 1/573β¨
8. Lee - 1/722β¨
9. Shearer - 1/730β¨
10. Ameobi - 1/737
Forza VAR! Forza the Future! Forza Football! π€πΌ
27.11.2024 23:01 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0The only genuine reason for criticism of VAR is that implementing it worldwide is an expensive taskβ¦ if only football was the most popular sport on the planet and generated untold billions across its leagues and international cups every year! π€·πΌββοΈ
Making footy fairer for all is the right thing to do!
1. Improving the standard of referees
2. Pestering the IFAB to not alter the Laws of the Game once a year by including unnecessary, minuscule, rule changes and/or adding dumb new rules/laws
3. If step #2 fails, then pestering FAs to make their Refs understand the rules of the season pre-start
Instead of complaining about VAR, which is a provable, factual, improvement to the sport and football as a whole - on a global scale - they should focus their attention where it should be focused:
27.11.2024 23:01 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Pre-VAR fans spent the next week after watching their team lose due to a contentious ref decision complaining about the refs decisions in that match. They still do, but because itβs now called something else (VAR), it has βruined footballββ¦ π€¦πΌββοΈ π€·πΌββοΈ
27.11.2024 23:01 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Fans protest because it demands them having to pay more attention to the refs than they had to pre-VAR as itβs not just a one or two individuals, visible on the pitch, responsible for making (quite often wrong) decisions anymore.
27.11.2024 23:01 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0However, even if it on average takes between 10 to 20 seconds more to rule out a goal using VAR vs. an Offside Flag - a price worth paying for the chance to be 98.8% certain the goal was good vs. knowing 2 out of 10 goals, on average pre-VAR, never should have counted
27.11.2024 23:01 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Main Complaint:
βIt ruins celebrating goals!β
Narrator: βIt did not do that..β
If someone *still* needs to be explained basic logic and FIFA R&Rβs, picture this chain of events:
Using VAR in Football = Correct Answer
1. Unifies Football under ONE Refereeing Standard πΊοΈ
2. Avg Accuracy globally now 98.8%, was 93%
3. Avg Correct Key Match Decisions (fouls, cards, etc) now 96%, was 82%
The list is endless. Anyone opposed to VAR are, in fact, only afraid of changeβ¦
Cont:
Impressive ambition shown by a lot of the newly promoted teams across the pyramid in Norway & Sweden. The combo of ambitious clubs and the amount of quality talent, young as experienced, going unattached into the next transfer window means some exciting months ahead ππΌ
Art: David Squires
Will BlueSky manage to become what Twitter used to be before it got shanghaied by Musk and turned into a right wing boiling put 50% populated by bots?
Was Twitter already heading that way, meaning a SoMe network like it was a dying trend, or is there still a demand for one, and enough users?