Intuitive video explaining how linear regression can be viewed in a probablisitic framework, including popular regularization choices
www.youtube.com/watch?v=q7se...
@mstoud.bsky.social
Researcher at Flatiron Institute. Methods for solving high-dimensional problems, tensor networks, and the ITensor software.
Intuitive video explaining how linear regression can be viewed in a probablisitic framework, including popular regularization choices
www.youtube.com/watch?v=q7se...
A depressing thing Iβve found is that the left is just in denial about this. Iβve met quite a few people where if I mention Fox News they say βIβve never watched itβ. How will you understand your own country if you donβt from time to time?
24.05.2025 12:46 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Somehow the speed up is both quadratic and exponential
09.05.2025 02:06 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0This is not quantum-related but the parallels with quantum computing are uncanny: a company has declared that it has resurrected an extinct species from the last ice age, but all they actually did was change 14 genes of the grey wolf's DNA. π§΅
www.theguardian.com/commentisfre...
What if Wigner's friend was Schrodinger's cat?
30.03.2025 02:18 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0A beautiful story of abstract mathematics extending into physics and engineering and resulting in 33% more efficient lighting. Better algorithms were the key, as they usually are, speeding up calculations by 1000x. www.simonsfoundation.org/2025/03/24/t...
28.03.2025 21:25 β π 11 π 0 π¬ 0 π 1The attitude we desperately need in Tech
26.03.2025 10:57 β π 470 π 57 π¬ 8 π 7I think there could be other reasons to build quantum computers, if more serious investigations were done into them. Power consumption and time to solution mainly. I think supremacy over classical is mostly a dead end, especially for NISQ.
14.03.2025 18:42 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0I should add: not just simulate, but to better accuracy than they have reported. And in a scalable way.
13.03.2025 13:16 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Just to be clear, I donβt think we claimed anywhere that D-Wave has no advantage. We see that as something they still have the burden of proving (if itβs even conceivably provable). We just showed itβs possible to simulate a large range of the same protocols.
13.03.2025 12:48 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 2Actually we just havenβt tried that one yet β¦ maybe itβs hard, maybe not. Itβs an open question.
13.03.2025 11:52 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 1Maybe the question should be why D-Waveβs was timed to land just before APS :^)
12.03.2025 22:57 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Yeah I can ask my coauthors again but I certainly had no personal idea about the timing. It is pretty wild.
12.03.2025 22:56 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Could perhaps have done it sooner but one of the key methods we used was only invented by a different group last fall. Iβve been emphasizing to journalists that itβs a fast-moving, dynamic field!
12.03.2025 22:53 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0In fact, we posted when we did because of APS Physics Summit coming up and the first author wanted to speak on it. The timing with Scienceβs publication was a coincidence. Itβs been surprising to us too.
12.03.2025 22:53 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 2 π 0π quite worthwhile to read the whole thread
12.03.2025 20:11 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Another new classical simulation incoming:
arxiv.org/abs/2503.08247
How far we can scale up to very large sizes depends quite a bit on which system 2D vs 3D interactions etc. All of our results appear quite scalable though.
10.03.2025 22:43 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0It depends. Since the couplings are random one has to define that limit carefully, and if itβs defined through observables then one can often obtain the same result by averaging many finite systems.
10.03.2025 22:42 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0And if similar results can be obtained for other systems, the flexibility and precision of tensor network methods can shed light on important open physics questions.
10.03.2025 14:38 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Despite decades of research, the development of classical algorithms continues at a rapid pace and is really only beginning. More caution is needed when claiming that structured problems, including quantum ones, are too hard for classical methods.
10.03.2025 14:38 β π 7 π 0 π¬ 1 π 1It is sometimes claimed that simulating dynamics is exponentially hard, but not all problems are created equally. Newly efficient methods for contracting tensor networks are bringing more cases of dynamics of 2D & 3D quantum systems within reach.
10.03.2025 14:38 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Quantum dynamics is a frontier at which classical simulation methods have struggled: For example, many Monte Carlo methods encounter a severe sign problem and tensor networks have been limited to short times and low dimensions.
10.03.2025 14:38 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0In a new preprint arxiv.org/abs/2503.05693, led by Joseph Tindall and Antonio Mello at Flatiron CCQ, we simulate annealing of disordered quantum magnets π§² β and in many cases find better accuracy than recent results from D-Wave devices and leading classical methods (c.f. arxiv.org/abs/2403.00910).
10.03.2025 14:38 β π 45 π 7 π¬ 3 π 1