Chris Piper

Will the new Senate rule make it easier for presidents to confirm their teams? | Brookings En bloc voting will not significantly speed up the overall process, but can have an impact at the final stage, the floor vote.

New @brookings.edu post out by @kdunntenpas.bsky.social and I examines the Senate’s rules change to allow en bloc consideration of nominees. While it is unlikely to dramatically speed up the overall process, it could make a noticeable difference in the time the Senate spends voting on the floor.

Will the new Senate rule make it easier for presidents to confirm their teams? | Brookings En bloc voting will not significantly speed up the overall process, but can have an impact at the final stage, the floor vote.

Was triggering the nuclear option in early September worth it? See research by me and @chrispiper.bsky.social to find out. www.brookings.edu/articles/wil...

Some of these reforms were pursued by Senate Democrats in the last Congress. However, no major reform of the process has occurred since 2012-2013, when they eliminated the confirmation requirement for 166 positions, and the threshold for cloture on most nominations was lowered.

Reform may be possible to expedite the confirmation process. Senate Republicans have discussed shortening post-cloture debate time, bundling lower-level nominations for joint consideration, and reducing the number of positions requiring Senate confirmation.

Senate Republicans have argued that they are facing “historic obstruction.”Minority Leader Schumer has explained that the “historic levels of scrutiny” are due to nominees’ lack of experience, conflicts of interest, and perceived extreme views.

Trump’s nominees have faced the longest confirmation delays of any administration in the first 200 days. They have waited 74% longer compared with his first term and nearly four times longer than nominees in the Reagan administration.

All the president’s nominations: Taking stock at the 200-day mark | Brookings Following an initial flurry of nominations, there has been a substantial drop in the number of Trump nominations in the second 100 days.

Every nominee has required a final recorded vote and nearly all have required the invocation of cloture. These processes require limited floor time and create a bottleneck in the Senate. www.brookings.edu/articles/all...

Happy to share my first @brookings.edu FixGov piece was published today. I take stock of the Senate confirmation process at the 200-day mark of the Trump administration. Among the key findings is the unprecedented degree to which Trump’s nominees have faced procedural barriers.

Urgent reform is needed to reduce the number of Senate confirmed positions, streamline the paperwork and vetting processes, increase transparency in the holds process, and allow for nominations to be bundled and considered at once.

All of the individuals we talked to were passionate public servants. However, the cost required to get to confirmation discouraged many from future service. One interviewee said, “It discourages qualified people to look at the positions because why would I go through that hell?”

While nominees used to be able to expect a confirmation process to be completed in around 3 months, there are now much longer waits with a lot more uncertainty. 90% of Reagan’s first term nominees were confirmed in 3 months, while 25% of Biden’s were confirmed in the same time.

The interviews revealed three key challenges: 1. Uncertainty characterizes nearly every step of the process. 2. Long delays harm agencies and present national security risks. 3. The hurdles of the current process dissuade talented individuals from considering nominations.

Ready, Set…Wait: Nominee Experiences through the Senate Confirmation Process

New report out by me and my team. We conducted interviews with former nominees of Senate-confirmed positions to highlight the stark challenges faced by nominees, their families and the agencies they aim to serve. presidentialtransition.org/reports-publ...

This is in large part to increasing procedural barriers. It is now the norm for nominees to go through the cloture process and the expectation for nominees to need a final recorded vote. This requires increased floor time which is precious in the start of a Congress.

Despite the importance of Cabinet secretaries, it has taken recent presidents much longer to get their nominees confirmed. Despite having no nominees withdrawn, Biden still waited until March 22 for his final confirmation.

These delays have caused at least 3 confirmation hearings to be postponed. Despite this, Trump is still about on par with his predecessors on getting hearings scheduled. The last few hearings have been difficult for recent administrations to get scheduled, often due to withdrawals.

By the time Trump named a nominee for each Cabinet department this cycle, his most recent predecessors had named just two or fewer. However, delays in getting MOUs signed with DOJ meant that nominees were announced before completing FBI background checks.

Confirming the Cabinet: Historical Trends of Cabinet Secretary Confirmations Across the Last Five Presidential Administrations The president’s Cabinet secretaries are among the most important and public-facing leaders within any administration. Unlike White House staff members who can be appointed unilaterally by the presiden...

New blog out by me that explores historical trends in the consideration of Cabinet secretaries. 1/ presidentialtransition.org/confirming-t...