Amazing how many people on this app just refuse to let someone explain that they've misunderstood/misread something. Having to go back to blocking people just so I don't waste too much time
12.02.2026 17:45 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0@willcooling.bsky.social
Writes & Hosts the It Could Be Said substack & podcast; https://itcouldbesaid.substack.com/ Has contributed to a variety of outlets on politics, sport or pop culture Contact email is w.cooling[at]gmail.com All opinions his own & not of any employer
Amazing how many people on this app just refuse to let someone explain that they've misunderstood/misread something. Having to go back to blocking people just so I don't waste too much time
12.02.2026 17:45 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0I bet that guy hated his fish
12.02.2026 17:18 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Yes. And because of that there's also not 80 people to nominate a non-serious candidate for leader. Be serious now!
12.02.2026 17:17 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Yeah. You just keep having people resign until he gets the message. It's that simple.
12.02.2026 17:06 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Plus that way you only seven people whereas in the, to be frank, insane plan outlined above, you need 81. And again the point of the stalking horse was not to win, but to dislodge the leader by showing how weak their position was.
12.02.2026 16:47 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Neither of these apply to Labour so you're not going to get a stalking horse. It would either be a big resignation a la how Sajid Javid quitting kickstarted the stampede that forced Johnson to quit or lots of junior ministers quitting a la the Watson-led coup that brought down Blair
12.02.2026 16:27 β π 5 π 0 π¬ 2 π 0Likewise the threshold for being a viable candidate was so low, and elections took place every year. That means someone could easily throw their hat in the ring to show how much discontent there was, thereby encouraging more serious candidates to run the following year
12.02.2026 16:24 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Well yes, I agee. But a stalking horse candidate refers to a particular gambit, that doesn't make sense in the context of Labour's rules
Because the Tories allowed new candidates to come in on later rounds, it was possible to use Candidate A to force the leader out, so Candidate B could then win
Extremely my kind of joke
11.09.2025 17:22 β π 221 π 40 π¬ 4 π 4Astonished we're actually getting our pay increase on time!
12.02.2026 16:07 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Is it just that I'm using bluesky more this week because i'm stuck on an assignment I'm not particularly enjoying writing or has bluesky been particularly crazy this week?
12.02.2026 16:04 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0So tempted to make a non-denial, denial joke here....
12.02.2026 16:02 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Never heard "now able to buy actual porn" described as that before.....
12.02.2026 15:59 β π 4 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Stalking horse doesn't work with the Labour rules though
12.02.2026 15:57 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 2 π 0Do you think there should no curbs on immigration whatsoever?
If you not, WHAT ARE YOU COMPLAINING ABOUT!?!
Yes. And obviously Eurotrash straddled (sorry not sorry) that and the other lost genres of Horny Telly and Laugh Openly At Foreigners Telly
12.02.2026 15:53 β π 6 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0It would be fascinating to discover whether Eurotrash viewers were more likely to vote Reform or Leave twenty years later
12.02.2026 15:50 β π 6 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Not least because if you remove the wage incentive for people to do horrible jobs, you'll need to find another way to compel them.
12.02.2026 15:26 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0More evidence that Matt Yglesias is right that people don't actually want politicians to do things
12.02.2026 15:15 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 2 π 0True story the first I did after defecting from the Tories at University, was loudly campaign for him for Deputy Leader. Clearly I heard his "A Benn not a Bennite" and decided "ah well, close enough".
12.02.2026 15:03 β π 7 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Erm..... bsky.app/profile/rent...
12.02.2026 14:58 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 3 π 0But they're also losing millions whilst doing so!
12.02.2026 14:38 β π 5 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0What I continue to find maddening about these pieces is, look, if your new technological innovation does not create new jobs and just destroys old ones...you don't actually *have* to keep doing it!
12.02.2026 14:26 β π 147 π 26 π¬ 25 π 5Also Labour didn't have a debate on trans rights! It awkwardly answered one way until it felt the politics had shifted, then it started awkwardly answering the other way. They never worked out what it wanted to do. Now Streeting's off doing his own thing whilst Philipson hides behind the sofa
12.02.2026 14:27 β π 35 π 6 π¬ 1 π 0As the old line goes from Henry Ford, if he had asked the customer what they wanted, they'd have told him they wanted a faster horse.
12.02.2026 14:10 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0I'm sorry this is just missing the point. If I'm a marketer for a book company, I don't get to tell them that actually the people want ice cream. The company sells books, its my job to figure out how to sell them. Yes I can give them tips about what types of books people say they want, but that's it
12.02.2026 14:09 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Okay one more time
No one mainstream in politics is advocating for open borders
So everyone in the mainstream agrees there must be some curbs on immigration
You are conflating any curbs on immigration with wanting net emmigration which is just not what Burnham said in the slightest
Yeah this is a waste of time. You're just imagining things to get mad about. Have a good day.
12.02.2026 13:30 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Okay this is the issue with this government. They pride themselves as beinga ble to reach out beyond the Labour/liberal echo chamber. But actually they think they're morons who will be fooled with cheap tricks and gimmicks.
12.02.2026 13:27 β π 14 π 1 π¬ 0 π 0I greatly admire you trying to one up both of our's attempts recently to scare people with the prospect of Yvette Cooper becoming Prime Minister π
Incidentally I think a real danger of the labour ruleset is that at some point no candidate can be successfully nominated and the process is deadlocked