Nicolas Clairis's Avatar

Nicolas Clairis

@nclairis.bsky.social

Postdoc passionate about effort-based decision-making and the roots of effort aversiveness. If you are on Mastodon, my profile is: @nicolasclairis@fediscience.org

234 Followers  |  455 Following  |  87 Posts  |  Joined: 18.12.2024  |  2.2149

Latest posts by nclairis.bsky.social on Bluesky


Preview
Academic publishers defeat lawsuit over ‘peer review’ pay, other restrictions A group of major academic publishers convinced a judge in New York to dismiss a lawsuit accusing them of thwarting competition by barring scholars from submitting papers to multiple journals simultane...

Unsurprising, but still sad that it didn't work out www.reuters.com/legal/govern...

18.02.2026 16:16 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

If you work at the intersection of computational neuroscience and machine learning, consider applying for this postdoc position (January 2027 start date):
academicpositions.harvard.edu/postings/15868
An opportunity to work with a great group of people across Harvard, MIT, and UC Berkeley.

10.02.2026 19:36 — 👍 69    🔁 47    💬 2    📌 2

Little error on the contact email: this is the correct adress wheretopublish-contact at protonmail.com

11.02.2026 11:13 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0
DAFNEE, a Database of Academia Friendly jourNals in Ecology and Evolution

and for those in ecology & evolution, there is also the DAFNEE database which hilights specifically ethical journals in that field dafnee.isem-evolution.fr and that we also exploited to build where to publish. Thanks @nicolasgaltier.bsky.social for the exchanges!

10.02.2026 15:02 — 👍 3    🔁 1    💬 1    📌 0

Because they are a for-profit journal that wants to make money and they know that topic is hot within and beyond scientists... just a wild guess 😁

10.02.2026 13:21 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

For more literature on the subject, you can also look at all the great work done by @hansonmark.bsky.social, @paolocrosetto.bsky.social and colleagues bsky.app/profile/hans...

10.02.2026 09:42 — 👍 5    🔁 1    💬 1    📌 0

Change is possible and alternatives exist. Let’s make it happen!
If you would like to contribute, don’t hesitate to write to us at wheretopublish@protonmail.com or directly via contributing on the database or website.
#ScientificPublicationSystem
#OpenAccess
#OpenScience
#AcademicSky
4/4

10.02.2026 09:42 — 👍 3    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

You can use this database both to choose where to publish your next paper based on the publisher type, the APC and the business model of the journal, as well as to select which journals you are ok to review for or to act as an editor for. 3/4

10.02.2026 09:42 — 👍 4    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0
Post image

There is a growing consensus in academia that the current scientific publishing system needs to change. Where to Publish? was built as a database of all life-science journals to promote that change by highlighting journals that are open access and whose revenues directly serve Academia. 2/4

10.02.2026 09:42 — 👍 3    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0
Where to Publish?

Dear all, I'm happy to present you a side project done with @diegoharta.bsky.social @phylogenetrips.bsky.social & Lucas Baudouin regarding the publication landscape in Biology: wheretopublish.github.io 1/4

10.02.2026 09:42 — 👍 10    🔁 6    💬 1    📌 2
Preview
World Greek Language Day Following the decision adopted at the recent UNESCO General Conference concerning the Greek language and its contribution to universal culture, the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural

Happy World Greek Language Day! Καλή μέρα σε όλους! www.unesco.org/en/articles/... #greek #greekLanguageDay

09.02.2026 09:18 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0
Figure 1 from the paper.
Econ: from 2008 to 2024, methods aiming for causal inference have increased, theoretical work has decreased. 
Psych: Mostly experimental or descriptive correlational work.

Figure 1 from the paper. Econ: from 2008 to 2024, methods aiming for causal inference have increased, theoretical work has decreased. Psych: Mostly experimental or descriptive correlational work.

Just learned about this study looking at methodological trends in psych and econ over time: online.ucpress.edu/collabra/art....

Matches my perception well: Nobody in psych bothers to (explicitly) try causal inference unless they conducted an experiment, not a lot of theoretical work either.

29.01.2026 09:41 — 👍 68    🔁 17    💬 8    📌 4
Post image

Institut Pasteur (@pasteur.fr) is recruiting new young PIs to open new groups in the Institute. Deadline is February 9th! Don't miss the opportunity!

27.01.2026 18:56 — 👍 34    🔁 49    💬 0    📌 0
Preview
Feedback-induced attitudinal changes in risk preferences Nature Communications - Normative theory predicts that feedback should not affect decisions under risk, but past findings disagree. Here, the authors show that feedback shifts risk-taking by...

🧵 New paper in @NatureComms
Feedback-induced attitudinal changes in risk preferences
Nasioulas, Potier, Cerrotti, Lebreton & me (2026)
Does feedback really improve risky decision-making? Short answer: no! it changes attitudes, not learning. 👇
rdcu.be/e0VcO

27.01.2026 12:12 — 👍 42    🔁 14    💬 2    📌 0

@legorafi.bsky.social devrait déclarer forfait face à la réalité à ce stade.

27.01.2026 09:02 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0
Preview
A prefrontal cortex map based on single-neuron activity - Nature Neuroscience The authors mapped spontaneous and choice activity across mouse prefrontal cortex. The activity maps aligned with intrinsic connectivity rather than anatomical subregions, suggesting that connectivity...

Main postdoc study out! We can redefine prefrontal cortex regions with single-unit activity! Grateful to @carlenlab.bsky.social and @weltgeischt.bsky.social who made this crazy project real. Thanks to all co-authors, collaborators, and reviewers.
www.nature.com/articles/s41...

20.01.2026 10:53 — 👍 97    🔁 21    💬 5    📌 3
Preview
Three major research universities opt out of new Elsevier deal Complaints over ‘price increases’ and open access models spur UK institutions to walk away from offer from publishing giant, despite nationally negotiated agreement

Kent, Essex and apparently Sussex all decline to be gouged by Elsevier Read & Publish deals. Others may well follow. 1/2

22.01.2026 08:09 — 👍 134    🔁 43    💬 3    📌 2

Merci pour l'éclairage! Je n'ai pas assez suivi la littérature sur le sujet pour avoir un avis très tranché donc tous vos éléments de réflexion là-dessus sont intéressants.

18.01.2026 12:33 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

Oui, When Prophecy Fails, l'étude fondatrice de la théorie de la dissonance cognitive repose sur des faits fabriqués :
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/....

Une "dissonance cognitive" auquelle beaucoup restent accrochés, dont G. Bronner, malgré les critiques connues du concept (et c'est meta 💀)

17.01.2026 16:47 — 👍 108    🔁 64    💬 3    📌 5
Preview
Le sentiment d’injustice nourrit les théories du complot Une théorie du complot ne naît pas simplement d’une perception négative des « élites » qui tireraient les ficelles dans l’ombre. Encore faut-il, pour ceux et celles qui y croient, un sentiment d’être ...

Merci pour ce super thread! Dans le cas des théories complotistes j'avais trouvé super intéressantes les études montrant un lien avec les inégalités sociales suggérant qu'il s'agit d'un phénomène social avant tout www.sciencepresse.qc.ca/actualites-s...

18.01.2026 08:44 — 👍 20    🔁 2    💬 2    📌 0

@albertm.bsky.social à prendre en compter dans tes futurs talks sur les biais cognitifs (si pas déjà le cas)!

18.01.2026 08:41 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

Super interesting! Thanks for sharing! You should write a short communication or at least a preprint about that so people can also share and learn about that outside of bluesky!

06.01.2026 08:56 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

I hope this one gets an #IgNobel would be well deserved

26.12.2025 18:54 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0
Preview
More than half of researchers now use AI for peer review — often against guidance A survey of 1,600 academics found that more than 50% have used artificial-intelligence tools while peer reviewing manuscripts.

Just decline the peer review invitation.

What are you people even doing?

16.12.2025 22:39 — 👍 655    🔁 196    💬 34    📌 29
Preview
Publisher under fire after ‘fake’ citations found in AI ethics guide A book published by Springer Nature includes dozens of questionable citations, including references to journals that do not exist

Another AI-fabricated book from Top Quality academic publisher Spring Nature.

15.12.2025 08:23 — 👍 17    🔁 6    💬 3    📌 0
Post image

fediscience.org/@ungarage@ma...

11.12.2025 13:18 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0
Post image

Publication charges

05.12.2025 14:17 — 👍 240    🔁 52    💬 1    📌 1
Post image

#Communiqué 🗞️ L'@academiesciences.bsky.social et le CNRS signent un accord de coédition pour développer un modèle de publication scientifique en libre accès et gratuit. ✍️

👉 www.cnrs.fr/fr/presse/la...

04.12.2025 15:04 — 👍 60    🔁 29    💬 1    📌 3

Proton 💙

04.12.2025 12:49 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

thanks for the tip! Didn't knew one could do that on bsky. Which ones would you recommend? I just added "trump" but not sure which others work well on that regard?

04.12.2025 10:37 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

@nclairis is following 20 prominent accounts