Beeerdude's Avatar

Beeerdude

@beeerdude.bsky.social

105 Followers  |  92 Following  |  41 Posts  |  Joined: 16.07.2023  |  2.196

Latest posts by beeerdude.bsky.social on Bluesky


The Atlantic protects sexual predators.

The Atlantic protects sexual predators.

This you guys?

24.02.2026 22:26 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Counter point, go fuck yourself.

19.02.2026 18:14 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

How is Acee still employed?

24.01.2026 23:33 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Dutch oven bread is the way to go. Much easier than other methods.

21.12.2025 01:41 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Will Cain is a whole bitch who got wrecked in sports and had to go shake ass for racists for money

03.12.2025 22:15 β€” πŸ‘ 1420    πŸ” 228    πŸ’¬ 26    πŸ“Œ 10

A sandwich? Lol. Try dinner and a drink.

05.11.2025 23:48 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Even 100x would be fine for huge multi national companies. The problem is it's 400+ for way too many companies.

24.10.2025 04:44 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

So is Alien Earth.

17.09.2025 01:10 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Tahoe

Tahoe

26.08.2025 16:25 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
a cartoon character with a beard and earrings looks angry Alt: Sadness
26.08.2025 03:52 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Then what happened? 😁

26.08.2025 02:14 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Y'all need to fix your site. Every time you go to it on a mobile device, the user is redirected to some spam site after it loads. You should stop sending out links until it's fixed.

05.08.2025 23:35 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Thank you for the reply. I watched your YouTube live and heard what you shared. Didn't realize how bad he played for such long stretches this season. Hopefully he's just adjusting as an 18 year old.

01.08.2025 04:19 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Any particular reason why? Not the bat part, the feedback from your contacts.

31.07.2025 20:20 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Context?

29.07.2025 16:29 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I am okay with dropping billionaires through skylights too though.

14.07.2025 16:53 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I am just pointing out that these issues don't justify a billion dollar new stadium IMO. Maybe to you they do.

I think Snapdragon could have been designed better. It is fine, but it is clearly a cheap football centric stadium and I think SDSU could have done better.

11.07.2025 17:39 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Field quality seems like something that they should be able to be addressed though, right? Sharing the field with a football team is certainly not helpful in that regard but SDSU isn't even playing right now and it's not great. SDFC games are mostly at night, shade isn't a problem at 730 pm.

11.07.2025 17:36 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

LOL you know that's not what I meant. Well played though.

11.07.2025 17:27 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

What is the primary issue? I get it's not a billion dollar stadium, but I have had no issues enjoying the couple of soccer games I watched there.

This isn't related to the project, just wondering what the issue is with it. Some of food options being relegated to one corner certainly isn't ideal.

11.07.2025 17:26 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

If only there was a stadium in San Diego that already met this criteria

11.07.2025 17:20 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

That neither team fills consistently. So why build another 50k person stadium, in a less accessible location of the city, that will then be half filled at best?

11.07.2025 16:38 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

They will never agree to it though.

Also, I love going to games at Petco, but Petco was not needed to redevelop Gaslamp. Redevelopment would have occurred eventually anyway. Without the stadium, redevelopment would have been cheaper and would bring in more revenue to the city on an annual basis.

11.07.2025 16:36 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

The Soccer City group was under no obligation to build a stadium or bring an MLS team to San Diego. They were going to develop the land first, then maybe try to bring a team to San Diego, if it made sense to them financially.

11.07.2025 16:27 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Also, we don't need another stadium IMO. Stadiums are the worst investment you can make. In almost every scenario you are better off economically by building anything else.

11.07.2025 16:25 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

If the developer really wants to build a stadium, and buys the land at market rate, have at it. They don't want to buy it though, they want to be given the land for next to nothing.

Just like Soccer City, there will be no guarantee of a stadium once details of the proposal are released.

11.07.2025 16:23 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Where did I say I hated progress? You are making up an argument I never made.

11.07.2025 16:05 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I'm not saying we should only build housing. I am just against giving land to a developer who will pocket billions of dollars cause they make empty promises of a stadium. The Soccer City group tried to do the same thing.

11.07.2025 16:01 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Even if Snapdragon is not a great soccer stadium, there is no reason to spend any money on another stadium in San Diego. This is just a ploy for the developer to get a hold of the site.

11.07.2025 15:49 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 1

No one cares.

29.06.2025 15:09 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

@beeerdude is following 19 prominent accounts