noevidenz

And they still won't say his name right.

Either they withhold their votes and he runs rampant during the shutdown, or they give him the votes and make themselves complicit. They don't have the power to stop him either way.

so many dead canaries and we just keep on mining

Report: You To Be Fired For Reading This Headline About Charlie Kirk NEW YORK—Insisting your fate was sealed the moment you clicked the link, a report released Tuesday found that you will be fired for reading this headline about Charlie Kirk. “Shortly after you navigat...

Report: You To Be Fired For Reading This Headline About Charlie Kirk

Go check it out, it's well worth your time

No, Charlie Kirk was not practicing politics the right way His assassination deserves full condemnation; his full impact should not be sidestepped.

NEW: No, Charlie Kirk was not practicing politics the right way. That's what Ezra Klein said. We can condemn this heinous assassination but also recognize that with his 2020 election denialism and extremist rhetoric, Kirk built his movement with falsehoods and in a wrong and divisive manner.

Yoooo wtf, he lost Chase too?! Weren't Alex's new supplement businesses in Chase's name to avoid the bankruptcy thing?

You guys see where this is going? Right?

Do you have any pictures of this? Please share them if so. The ADF takes that type of thing very seriously.

Thanks Ofuane.

"When prompted, ChatGPT agreed."

This @zohrankmamdani.bsky.social video is absolutely INCREDIBLE. The numbers he cites, the strategy and results they produced — it’s the future. When have you heard *any* campaign talk about this, ever? (Video split in 2 to fit in Bluesky’s limits)

Congresspeople finally learn what normal people face every single day when commuting to work. Harrowing.

Why is Loomer stalking her Instagram anyway? How far back did she have to scroll to find that picture?

Absolute fucking clown. That was branding which would permanently and immediately be identifiable as Trump's.

Striking the name will only obscure who's responsible.

Or maybe they're just starving for representation

The original script for Source Code is out there online. It differs in a few ways (which I really liked) to the film and I'd really recommend checking it out if you haven't already

"When I said that there was a cabal of billionaires secretly plotting to rob you of your democratic voice I did not mean that there was a cabal of billionaires secretly plotting to rob you of your democratic voice."

I think her 2c titanium tax goes too far.

But you ain't got no capital, Lieutenant Dan.

Possibly trying to rob Greens of seats that could be used to pressure Labor to pull left?

Not sure which is more bizarre - Dan Andrews being used for propaganda despite having left politics nearly 2 years ago, or the ghostly third handrail that makes it look like Albo's using a mobility walker.

If they get overruled on this, their next step will be just to withhold payment and wait until the employees quit.

Calling it a vulnerability is a bit misleading. The memo indicates that Signal users are being targeted by a phishing campaign. This is an exploitation of user behaviour, not a vulnerability in the Signal application or protocol.

What's the alternative and in what way is it worse?

Oh, right. The rant. The rant about Kuzco. The rant made especially to criticise Kuzco, Kuzco's rant.

It's also gotta be illegal to throw a shoe off a building, right?

I didn't mind it, and that's what really bothered me.

Harry Potter and the Mandatory Fifteen-minute Phone Queue