Nataliia Kaliuzhna's Avatar

Nataliia Kaliuzhna

@nataliiak.bsky.social

PhD candidate in Library & Information Science. πŸ“TIB, OpenScience Lab |Academic publishing |Open science |ScholComm |Open access

84 Followers  |  115 Following  |  17 Posts  |  Joined: 13.12.2024  |  2.1194

Latest posts by nataliiak.bsky.social on Bluesky

Recommendations for Scholarly Publishers and Journal Editors to Mitigate Barriers to Open Access Publishing for Researchers with Weak Institutional Ties The recommendations aim to provide a basis for keeping the publication process as free as possible from barriers for authors with weak institutional ties, in order to enable an inclusive and epistemically just scientific publication system. The recomendations were developed at the TIB – Leibniz Information Centre for Science and Technology in the course of the IDAHO project (IDentificAtion of Hurdles to Open Access Publishing for Researchers with Weak Institutional Ties: Epistemic Injustice in Scientific Publishing). The project focused on the obstacles faced by researchers with weak institutional ties in open access publishing. The recommendations were derived based on qualitative and quantitative studies with weakly-affiliated researchers and scientific journals editors.

Recommendations for Scholarly Publishers and Journal Editors to Mitigate Barriers to Open Access Publishing for Researchers with Weak Institutional Ties https://zenodo.org/records/17418990

23.10.2025 19:17 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Linked Open Profiles - ORCID Global Participation Fund Final Report 2025 Our project, Linked Open Profiles, is a WordPress plugin designed to display ORCID profile data directly on websites. With ORCID Global Participation Fund (GPF) support, we moved the tool from a proto...

Our team developed an open-source WordPress plugin that lets you pull in items from your ORCID profile and display them on your site. Very cool!

Schopieray, S., & Eben, G. (2025). Linked Open Profiles - ORCID Global Participation Fund Final Report 2025 (p. 3). MSU Commons. doi.org/10.17613/ypc...

27.10.2025 09:38 β€” πŸ‘ 43    πŸ” 16    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 3
Preview
Recommendations for Scholarly Publishers and Journal Editors to Mitigate Barriers to Open Access Publishing for Researchers with Weak Institutional Ties - TIB-Blog Rigorous, ethical, and timely research is being conducted beyond the walls of traditional universities and research institutions - and it deserves equitable opportunities for dissemination. Yet affiliation-based barriers often stand in the way. We propose a set of recommendations for academic publishers and editors to mitigate obstacles to open access publishing faced by researchers with weak institutional ties, thereby fostering a more inclusive and epistemically just scholarly communication system.

Rigorous, ethical and timely research is being conducted beyond the walls of traditional academia - it deserves equitable opportunities for dissemination. This set of recommendations aims to make scholarly communication system more inclusive and epistemically just
blog.tib.eu/2025/10/23/r...

23.10.2025 09:16 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Thank you for having us @drbeth.bsky.social!

13.10.2025 08:17 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
A banner image for a seminar entitled "Obstacles to Open Access publishing for researchers with weak institutional ties - epistemic injustice in academic publishing" The seminar is by Nataliia Kaliuzhna and Zeynep Aydin. In the background is a faded out image of academic library bookshelves.

A banner image for a seminar entitled "Obstacles to Open Access publishing for researchers with weak institutional ties - epistemic injustice in academic publishing" The seminar is by Nataliia Kaliuzhna and Zeynep Aydin. In the background is a faded out image of academic library bookshelves.

Did you miss the LIS Research seminar on "Obstacles to Open Access publishing for researchers with weak institutional ties"?

If so, never fear, the recording is now out! I'd really recommend giving it a listen.

doi.org/10.52843/cas...

#Library #openaccess #LISResearch #Librarian

07.10.2025 08:21 β€” πŸ‘ 22    πŸ” 8    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 1
Preview
Institutional affiliation should not be a requirement for doing research - Impact of Social Sciences Universities espouse a universalist approach to creating research-based knowledge. Helen Kara & Petra Boynton argue, from the outside these claims are hollow.

With yet another university hosted event closed to 'non academics' (aka those not employed by a university)* I'm just going to leave this piece by @drhelenkara.bsky.social and myself here blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsoci...

* yes I know it's utter nonsense and academics/researchers exist outside unis

07.10.2025 15:42 β€” πŸ‘ 62    πŸ” 26    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 2
Preview
How journal submission and hosting systems influence the level of open metadata in Crossref | Septentrio Conference Series In this presentation, we present the results of a large-scale analysis investigating the correlation between the level of metadata that publishers deposit with Crossref and the submission and hosting Β systems that they deploy for their journals.

πŸš€ How do journal systems shape open metadata in Crossref? πŸ“Š Kramer, de Jonge & Korzec analyze 150 publishers – tech vs. commercial choices? πŸ” Read more: septentrio.uit.no/index.php/SC...
πŸŒβ„οΈ #Munin2025 #OpenScience #Metadata #Crossref

06.10.2025 06:04 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 4    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Advocacy Kit Skills4EOSC β€˜Skills for the European Open Science commons: creating a training ecosystem for Open and FAIR science’ is funded by the European Commission Horizon Europe programme (GA 101058527)

Advocacy Kit for Open Science

And EU project (Skills4EOSC) has created an Advocacy Kit to empowers users to promote Open Science skills to policymakers and funders to help foster steady policy support.

06.10.2025 07:00 β€” πŸ‘ 6    πŸ” 3    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
NISO logo. NISO RP-49-202X. Open Access Business Processes (OABP), a Recommended Practice of the National Information Standards Organization. Draft for public comment.

NISO logo. NISO RP-49-202X. Open Access Business Processes (OABP), a Recommended Practice of the National Information Standards Organization. Draft for public comment.

Two weeks left! The draft Open Access Business Processes Recommended Practice is available for public comment. All in the information community are invited to review the document, view comments made by others, and provide feedback through October 17: www.niso.org/standards-co...
#OA #standards

03.10.2025 15:45 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Redefining publishing: why we're moving beyond the article - Research Information The current publishing system doesn’t reflect how science is done – or how it should be assessed, writes Iain Hrynaszkiewicz

Redefining publishing: why we’re moving beyond the article
www.researchinformation.info/analysis-opi...
The current publishing system doesn’t reflect how science is done – or how it should be assessed, writes Iain Hrynaszkiewicz of @plos.org

02.10.2025 08:22 β€” πŸ‘ 6    πŸ” 3    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 1
Post image

πŸ“šNew book chapter published with @intermediocl.bsky.social and C. Rovira

Factors for enhancing visibility in digital repositories: Metadata quality, interoperability standards, persistent identifiers, and SEO-GEO optimization

doi.org/10.3145/cuvi...

This work is part of @cuvicom.bsky.social

01.10.2025 12:36 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 4    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

Congratulations! Adding to my reading list.

01.10.2025 12:52 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Holly K. Andersen, Grace A. Shaw, Erica Olson & Rudy Reimer, Identifying Epistemic Injustices to Inform Epistemic Transformative Justice - PhilPapers In this chapter, we identify four specific subtypes of epistemic injustice that target Indigenous knowledge systems, practices, products, and methods of transmission. These four subtypes of epistemic ...

Preprint: specific subtypes of epistemic injustice where academic science interfaces with Indigenous knowledge in the BC area, targeted by epistemic transformative justice in 3 "the future looks better than the past" case studies. Great coauthors here
#philsci #philsky #sfu
philpapers.org/rec/ANDIEI

29.09.2025 17:27 β€” πŸ‘ 34    πŸ” 8    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Bristol University Press launches Global Social Challenges Development Fund - Research Information Initiative designed to democratise access to academic publishing and empower marginalised voices across the globe

Bristol University Press launches Global Social Challenges Development Fund
www.researchinformation.info/news/bristol...
Initiative designed to democratise access to academic publishing and empower marginalised voices across the globe
@brisunipress.bsky.social

30.09.2025 11:08 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 3    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 1
Preview
OA Week 2025: Who owns our knowledge? Event 1 | Open Access Australasia

Have you registered for any webinars for #OAWeek2025?
OAA as three webinars featuring regional and international speakers - Event 1 πŸ‘‡
The politics of knowledge: Who controls the story and who has access to it?
πŸ—“οΈ Tuesday October 21
oaaustralasia.org/events/oa-we...

29.09.2025 01:41 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 3    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
A website panel which says "Obstacles to Open Access publishing for researchers with weak institutional ties - epistemic injustic in academic publishing - Nataliia Kaliuzhna and Zeynep Aydin

A website panel which says "Obstacles to Open Access publishing for researchers with weak institutional ties - epistemic injustic in academic publishing - Nataliia Kaliuzhna and Zeynep Aydin

The first of this term's LIS research seminars is starting in just under 30 mins. I'm looking forward to seeing those of you who've registered there.

If you've not registered yet, you can still do so from this page cassyni.com/events/RY5W1...

26.09.2025 13:35 β€” πŸ‘ 6    πŸ” 4    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Great presentation from @nataliiak.bsky.social and Zeynep Aydin from the IDAHO project on "identification of hurdles to open access publishing for researchers with weak institutional ties"

26.09.2025 15:01 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Cassyni | Science starts with a seminar Seamlessly organise, run and publish academic research seminars. Get started in minutes.

Join us today for the LIS seminar β€œObstacles to Open Access publishing for researchers with weak institutional ties - epistemic injustice in academic publishing”
πŸ“… Friday 26th Sep 2025
⏰ 15.00 PM (GMT+1)

cassyni.com/events/RY5W1...

26.09.2025 11:05 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Upshot:
NNES report to need twice as long to read English-language papers and to prepare English presentations. Even among highly proficient NNES (C1–C2 level), ~60% report having avoided asking questions at events due to concerns about their English (compared to 16% of NES). #philsky

24.09.2025 16:55 β€” πŸ‘ 24    πŸ” 10    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Please check out ukrainian-carpentries.github.io for links to Ukrainian translations of @carpentries.carpentries.org Git and UNIX shell lessons!

23.09.2025 19:54 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 3    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

New article published with @intermediocl.bsky.social and Cris Rovira:

Visibility, Discoverability, Findability, Search Engine Optimization (SEO) and Academic SEO in Digital Repositories

doi.org/10.1344/BID202…

This work is part of @cuvicom.bsky.social and my research at @upf.edu

22.09.2025 10:46 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 4    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Visibility, Discoverability, Findability, Search Engine Optimization (SEO) and Academic SEO in Digital Repositories: A scoping review – BiD

πŸ‚ This paper offers 22 techniques to improve visibility in #digital_repositories. Must read for institutional repository managers! @danreyesl.bsky.social

doi.org/10.1344/bid2...

#greenOA #OA #SEO

22.09.2025 10:16 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Epistemic oligarchies: capture and concentration through science reform In this paper we describe how current efforts to reform science create oligarchic power structures within science and prepare scientific products for the uptake by existing oligarchic actors like Big ...

"Epistemic oligarchies: capture and concentration through science reform", a new preprint by Sven Ulpts (not here), Sheena Bartscherer (also not here), @nicolecnelson.bsky.social and me. Read it here: zenodo.org/records/1713... 1/

17.09.2025 08:23 β€” πŸ‘ 21    πŸ” 11    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 2
English is widely used as a lingua franca in scholarly communication, yet preserving local languages is vital to reaching a broader audience. Disseminating research in multiple languages can help ensure equitable access, a responsibility shared by both publishers and authors. This study examines the practices of both groups to identify any notable differences. Several academic social networks, preprint servers and repositories are analysed to evaluate the resources currently available and their existing policies. Additionally, journals that actively promote multilingual dissemination are reviewed to understand their implementation strategies and how these align with the standards set by their DOI Registration Agency (DOI RA). From the author’s perspective, differing policies across platforms can heavily influence decisions, mainly because not all platforms provide relationship metadata. Publishers face similar challenges, underscoring the urgent need for standardization. Moreover, the lack of consistency creates opportunities for unethical practices in academia, such as counting the total of citations originating from the same article in different languages. This highlights the importance of a more comprehensive approach to evaluating research beyond citation and document counts. Collaboration among publishers, authors and other stakeholders is essential to fostering greater understanding and preventing misconceptions in the academic landscape.

English is widely used as a lingua franca in scholarly communication, yet preserving local languages is vital to reaching a broader audience. Disseminating research in multiple languages can help ensure equitable access, a responsibility shared by both publishers and authors. This study examines the practices of both groups to identify any notable differences. Several academic social networks, preprint servers and repositories are analysed to evaluate the resources currently available and their existing policies. Additionally, journals that actively promote multilingual dissemination are reviewed to understand their implementation strategies and how these align with the standards set by their DOI Registration Agency (DOI RA). From the author’s perspective, differing policies across platforms can heavily influence decisions, mainly because not all platforms provide relationship metadata. Publishers face similar challenges, underscoring the urgent need for standardization. Moreover, the lack of consistency creates opportunities for unethical practices in academia, such as counting the total of citations originating from the same article in different languages. This highlights the importance of a more comprehensive approach to evaluating research beyond citation and document counts. Collaboration among publishers, authors and other stakeholders is essential to fostering greater understanding and preventing misconceptions in the academic landscape.

New from #UKSGInsights: "Multilingual research dissemination: current practices and implications for bibliometrics" dub.sh/NJjpJG3

17.09.2025 10:48 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 5    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Thank you

16.09.2025 08:33 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Samuel Moore’s book Publishing Beyond the Market: Open Access, Care and the Commons

Samuel Moore’s book Publishing Beyond the Market: Open Access, Care and the Commons

πŸš„ Heading to #OAT25 in Konstanz. Seven hours train companion @samuelmoore.org β€˜s fresh book β€œPublishing Beyond the Market: Open Access, Care and the Commons”

16.09.2025 07:37 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Science as a global public good? From the right to participate in science to science governance | Royal Society Science+ meeting organised by Professor Geoffrey Boulton FRS FRSE MAE and Professor Michela Massimi FRSE FRAS MAE

This 2-day workshop @royalsociety.org on the right to participate in science and science as a global public good brings together scientists, philosophers, and policy makers. The event is open to everyone and can also be attended online. Programme coming soon. Registration required πŸ‘‡

01.09.2025 15:43 β€” πŸ‘ 55    πŸ” 23    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 2
Post image

Making scientific knowledge freely available is essential, but not always easy. This new #RSOS study examines the barriers that prevent researchers from publishing #OpenAccess: royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/... @nataliiak.bsky.social

04.09.2025 13:04 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 3    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Reimagining the Humanities Book: Bringing Living With Machines to Life Through Experimental Publishing Workflows and Open Research Practices Click on the article title to read more.

Lovely article from our publishers at @uolpress.bsky.social about bringing the Living With Machines book to life 'Through Experimental Publishing Workflows and Open Research'. It's been so great working with Emma and Jamie on this! Practiceshttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/leap.2025

01.09.2025 12:43 β€” πŸ‘ 22    πŸ” 9    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 1
Preview
Lost in the Stacks: the Research Library Rock'n'Roll Radio Show: Episode 649: Global Equitable Open Access Guest: Melissa Hagemann, Director of the Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI), discussing her paper .  First broadcast August 1 2025. Transcript at   Playlist "And that is what we call an...

Check out the BOAI'sΒ Melissa Hagemann, as she talks with Lost in the Stacks: the Research Library Rock'n'Roll Radio Show about Global Equitable #OpenAccess. Fun format of weaving music about the theme in withΒ the interview.Β 

lostinthestacks.libsyn.com/episode-649-...

27.08.2025 15:02 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 1

@nataliiak is following 20 prominent accounts