Caroline Seydel's Avatar

Caroline Seydel

@carolineseydel.bsky.social

Independent science writer covering genetic technology. Always hopeful yet discontent.

715 Followers  |  806 Following  |  149 Posts  |  Joined: 13.11.2024  |  2.3288

Latest posts by carolineseydel.bsky.social on Bluesky

I think it’s pretty rare that anyone is charged with a crime in a traffic accident death.

22.11.2025 00:18 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Vision: slightly fewer child pedestrians unnecessarily mowed down by speeding vehicles

American drivers: HOW DARE YOU

22.11.2025 00:09 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

In the US we get bogged down in debates about whether speed cameras are more racist than traffic cops. My proposal: cars must have a sensor that beeps at you, like the β€˜fasten seat belt’ alarm, when you’re exceeding the speed limit by more than 5 mph for more than a minute.

22.11.2025 00:06 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

β€œCall my baby lollipop, tell you why
His kiss is sweeter than an apple pie”

Me at 10: omg music back then was so cute and wholesome

Me at 50: wait a minute, that is NOT why she calls him that

21.11.2025 18:26 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Because they think they have a chance, I assume

21.11.2025 18:22 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

β€œthose who collaborate with fascists” 🀣🀣

21.11.2025 07:30 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Yeah. I was agreeing with that. I guess my faux pas was losing focus that β€œthe real bad guyβ€œ here is the woman in Nigeria trying to make a living, not the exploitative industry that rewarded her unethical behavior

20.11.2025 17:01 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Wow. Yes, I’m struggling to even understand the concept of AAN because in my experience, if your BMI is on the higher side, doctors *advise* you to do all those things. Not binge/purge of course but, like, dramatically restrict your diet and be terrified of gaining any more weight

20.11.2025 16:55 β€” πŸ‘ 6    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

Maybe I misunderstood what you meant by β€œa quarter a word will do this”

20.11.2025 16:49 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Oh, I agree. And I have no doubt that it will change peopleβ€˜s shopping and spending habits, same as online retail did. I’m just getting old, and not looking forward to another shift.

20.11.2025 16:48 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Perhaps! I haven’t worked with those specific publications. And yet they all found the robot writer to be the best candidate in their inbox, hired it, and happily published its completely fabricated article.

20.11.2025 16:44 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I was thinking this too. And in the article he says β€œBut AI doesn’t care about [promotions, deals, and discounts] β€” if you ask for a car to the airport, an AI might just open Uber and Lyft and always pick the cheapest ride.” Would human users ever want that?

20.11.2025 16:41 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Not really? Editors want to commission pieces from writers who already have a long list of clips in prestigious publications and who can turn around reported stories in a few days for pennies a word. And now they’re shocked that, oops, their ideal candidates are actually robots.

20.11.2025 05:00 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

Yes. Dan Crenshaw was a Navy SEAL. Joni Ernst I think was National Guard? Rick Scott was Navy. I’m sure there are many others.

19.11.2025 20:46 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
60 Attorneys on the Year of Chaos Inside Trump’s Justice Department (Gift Article) Sixty former staffers describe an environment of suspicion and intimidation within the nation’s most powerful law enforcement agency.

60 attorneys describe a year of chaos and suspicion inside Trump's Justice Department.

β€œIf we’re indicting people because the president hates them, that’s counter to the whole point of doing my job.”

- Mike Romano, former prosecutor in the Public Integrity Section

www.nytimes.com/interactive/...

17.11.2025 17:22 β€” πŸ‘ 22    πŸ” 10    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Right? I mean, good that they finally investigated, although better to have done it before assigning the story. They’re telling on themselves here: the only way to get a pitch accepted is to have fake credentials and a fake resume. Real people just aren’t good enough anymore

19.11.2025 17:25 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Oh I saw that movie

19.11.2025 01:58 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
a man in captain america 's uniform says i understood that reference ALT: a man in captain america 's uniform says i understood that reference
18.11.2025 05:33 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Wouldn’t surprise me if he’s lying

18.11.2025 05:25 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

That’s not what β€œslut-shamingβ€œ means

18.11.2025 05:17 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I think he’s taking about the Patton Oswalt post calling for Megyn Kelly to be fed into a wood chipper

14.11.2025 20:45 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I still get paid with paper checks

14.11.2025 20:37 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

It's gotta be frustrating for journalists scraping by and doing great work to go to NY Times dot com and read a puff piece written by a nepo baby that whitewashes a journalist who had sex with a source and has now parlayed that into a new book and a job at Vanity Fair

14.11.2025 18:07 β€” πŸ‘ 708    πŸ” 126    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 18

It absolutely was, depending on the circumstances. Halloween costumes, etc - in my experience, most people did not consider that offensive in the 70s, 80s, 90s even. I don’t know exactly when it became taboo in any context, but pretty recently

13.11.2025 20:52 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Yeah but donors

13.11.2025 18:33 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I feel like we the taxpayers have bigger problems than punishing the tiny fraction of people desperate enough to steal a dead relative’s SNAP benefits

13.11.2025 16:19 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Can we circle back to the part where the NY Times never disclosed that they have incriminating information on Donald Trump from sent by Epstein that's been sitting on their email servers for nearly a decade?

12.11.2025 19:15 β€” πŸ‘ 8371    πŸ” 2751    πŸ’¬ 109    πŸ“Œ 236

Wait something doesn’t make sense … why is the 5:03 PM message higher in the thread than the 5:50 PM message

12.11.2025 21:18 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Young girl making a disgusted face with the caption β€œno”

Young girl making a disgusted face with the caption β€œno”

12.11.2025 21:04 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

William Gibson called it 40 years ago: β€œAnd, for an instant, she stared directly into those soft blue eyes and knew, with an instinctive mammalian certainty, that the exceedingly rich were no longer even remotely human.”

10.11.2025 20:33 β€” πŸ‘ 41    πŸ” 8    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

@carolineseydel is following 18 prominent accounts