Progress bar showing 2800/8000 35% ETA: 4m
Help to test new progress bar in CmdStanR by @josswright.bsky.social, see more at discourse.mc-stan.org/t/help-us-te...
28.02.2026 14:05 β π 12 π 7 π¬ 0 π 0@fusaroli.bsky.social
Cognitive Science at Aarhus Uni. Curious about social interactions, symbolic behaviors, and meta-science. Focus on stats, computational modeling, machine learning, complex systems, language, exp semiotics and neuropsychiatric conditions. He/They.
Progress bar showing 2800/8000 35% ETA: 4m
Help to test new progress bar in CmdStanR by @josswright.bsky.social, see more at discourse.mc-stan.org/t/help-us-te...
28.02.2026 14:05 β π 12 π 7 π¬ 0 π 0
β¨New Perspective out w/ Wenning Deng and @fearbrain.bsky.social in @cp-iscience.bsky.social ! We argue that social foraging gives us a unifying, and ecologically grounded way to study how decisions unfold across levels β from individuals and dyads to collectives.
www.cell.com/iscience/ful...
Little smart critters..πͺ°ππ
Cognitive primitives of the insect brain: Trends in Cognitive Sciences www.cell.com/trends/cogni...
π¨ New Paper: How can AI help us understand child lang dev? If we train models on childrenβs environment, they can tell us if this environment support learning.
E.g., models tested child linguistic input (Huebner et al.) and visual input (Vong et al.).
What about Social Interaction? (a thread π§΅)
While everyone is excited by early European precursors of 'writing', let's not forget the African geometrics, here Howiesons Poort oes, but also Blombos haematite, almost twice as old
phys.org/news/2026-02...
and here a few attempts at better understanding how these patterns might or not have been shaped by different cognitive/cultural constraints:
- www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/...
- onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/...
- www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
this signal detection based missing data estimation model (early stage) is brought to you by mu-ko the happy cow I'll have to work around for the next six month or so (or until my kids come around again and draw the next nuis... err masterpiece)
26.02.2026 09:52 β π 4 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Also 4 ways to fail an exam -3 , 00, used attempt and failed π€·π½
25.02.2026 17:32 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Short for half way towards 5 (from4) times 20!
25.02.2026 17:31 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 2 π 0discrete categories are useful for experiments and setting up competing hypotheses, so I totally get it. Yet, reality is complex and ancient semiotic behavior was likely a complex mix of different practices as well . So we need to take this plurality into account.
25.02.2026 17:04 β π 4 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0their relative weight is largely due to the practices of use and interpretation around the signs (the reason a sign in Peirce is triadic and not just expression and content as in saussure, as it's always co-defined in its conceivable interpretations). It's a subtle point, and 2/
25.02.2026 17:03 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0A pet peeve of mine is that lots of people referring to C.S. Peirce stated that he divided signs into icons (resemblance), indices (reference) and symbols (convention). Yet lots of his work was in showing how any sign has iconic, indexical and symbolic components, and 1/
25.02.2026 17:03 β π 4 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0
prepping my teaching for tomorrow and introducing pathfinder (a bayesian approximation model fitting technique) to the students: we can use it to quickly prototype, and SMARTLY to set init values for your MCMC, it'll be so much faster!
reality: FALSE (for simple models)
We might never learn what signs produced by ancient humans meant. But we are on a good track to at least understand which kinds of semiotic/cognitive practices they might have supported :-)
25.02.2026 12:41 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0I once had belgian interns who ended up publishing their work (academic.oup.com/chidev/artic...), I was asked to grade them, so I gave top grade (20, I think). I got a very puzzled call from their uni admin in belgium...
25.02.2026 12:33 β π 5 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Very speculatively, I could imagine this sign system having decorative functions, and acting as a mnemonic support, with some initial conventionalization. cool stuff!
25.02.2026 12:22 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 0 π 1But all in all, an important step in better understanding aurignacian sign systems. As the authors write: this points to aurignacians having "information capacity to create a sign system comparable to protocuneiformβ (rather than having done so). 9/
25.02.2026 12:22 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0This would allow to better qualify a theoretically solid analysis model and be more aware of possible confounds (e.g. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41381798/) 8/
25.02.2026 12:22 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0mapping how e.g. date might affect preservation and medium, and medium can affect preservation, and how sequence length is involved in all this, and how these things can affect data missingness, etc. 7/
25.02.2026 12:22 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Another thing that stands out to me is that the study could have strongly benefitted by a more explicit and thorough reflection on the data generating process. Currently the authors throw a bunch of predictors into a (stepwise) regression, rather than carefully 6/
25.02.2026 12:22 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0This might suggest that the sign system was not as abstractly conceived as protocuneiform (albeit one could make the claim that it was rather used in a very sophisticated way, like poetry vs name tags, tho unlikely). 5/
25.02.2026 12:22 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0and this is where the key finding of the paper for me lies: the aurignacians sign compositions have average formal properties (sequence length and predictability) similar to protocuneiform. Yet the properties vary substantially across artifact types (say figurine vs personal ornament) 4/
25.02.2026 12:22 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0What I particularly liked was the caution in the language (tho not the title!) and the attempt at looking at the formal properties of the sign compositions, including the context in which these compositions appear. 3/
25.02.2026 12:22 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0First, this is an important step in the epistemic iterations on the topic. Evidence is sparse and indirect (pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC...) and we need multiple angles and perspectives to make any progress. 2/
25.02.2026 12:22 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0
A new paper dropped out on "Humans 40,000 y ago developed a system of conventional signs" www.pnas.org/doi/full/10....
Understanding the evolution of human semiotic behavior is a crucial (basic) scientific enterprise & really difficult, so kudos!
I have thoughts: 1/
1. Kevin Gross and I have a new paper out today PLOS Biology.
We used economic models based around screening games and the market for unpaid labor to highlight a meltdown cycle threatening peer review.
yet v indistinct (colorless) that were boiling over under the surface (furiously) and not yet ready to be formulated clearly (sleeping). only me?
24.02.2026 12:03 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0listening to the pretty neat "the laws of thought" by @cocoscilab.bsky.social (recommended) &I finally got the "colorless green ideas..." point. I was introduced to it as grammatical but non-sensical, and that never made sense to me. As an undergrad it perfectly describe my immature (green) ideas 1/
24.02.2026 12:03 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Poster for the call. All relevant information is in thread
1/6
Excited to share the call for posters & registration for the 2nd XSCAPE Workshop: "Varieties of Externalism" !
π
Friday, April 10th, 2026 β Gallery Room, Bramber House, University of Sussex
Registration is free but places are limited. π§΅
π’ Talk announcement!
10th March with Dr. Luke Rendell: "Are we really about to talk to whales?"
All are welcome, for details see:
interactingminds.au.dk/events/singl...