Judges Fed

Panel opinion:

cases.justia.com/federal/appe...

Filed: Ninth Circuit DENIES petition for panel rehearing and en banc rehearing in CARRALERO V. BONTA - 2nd amendment and sensitive places

Judge Collins, joined by Bress, dissents

Judge VanDyke, joined by Callahan, Ikuta, Nelson, Lee, Bumatay dissents

cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/op...

Can't this be accomplished by viewing the metadata? E.g. On the Dec 16th orders list, the metadata tells us it was effectively final on Friday, December 13

Posts like these really highlight just how little know about Tiktok and the legislation.

En Banc: cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/op...

Panel opinion that was reversed: cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/op...

Project Veritas v. Smith - CA9, en banc

Held: Oregon's conversational privacy statute is content neutral, thus applying intermediate scrutiny and finds it serves a significant governmental interest in protecting conversational privacy.

Also rejects facial overbreadth challenge.

Thapar will be on the wrong side of 55 by the time a vacancy opens up. The nomination of RBG, at 60, closed the door on nominees over 55 effectivley.

Which is why its likely we're going to see someone like Ho, Oldham, VanDyke or Bumatay.

Trump can fire any of these people. Roberts Court has made it clear in past 15 years that executive branch nominees can be shown the door at any time.

Gorsuch was relatively silent in 3 OA that I can recall: Janus, Dobbs, WV/EPA. I think he’s had a propensity for voting against the progressive side when this happens and I do not expect it to stop here. Additionally, Gorsuch is not the one to author a narrow opinion, goes against him as a writer.