Whew! That’s a load off.
05.10.2025 21:13 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0@bootcanyon.bsky.social
Biscuits. Preheat 450F, 2 c flour, ¼ t salt, ½ t cr. of tartar, 1 T baking powder, 2 t sugar, 4 T cold butter, 2/3 c milk. Mix dry. Cut in butter. Add milk. Bring together into a ball. Knead once or twice. Roll out to 1/2”. Cut 2” biscuits. Bake 14-18 min.
Whew! That’s a load off.
05.10.2025 21:13 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I need to push back a bit on the EV credit. I think measures like this as well as protective tariffs ultimately hurt the manufacturer because they shield them from competition. It’s a dog eat dog world out there and if you keep your dog behind a fence he won’t learn how to fight.
05.10.2025 21:11 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0I say we ban travel altogether. You will be restricted from venturing more than one hour walking distance from your place of birth. You will each be given one acre upon which to grow your food but you may not raise animals for consumption of their meat or produce.
04.10.2025 17:50 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Nope. You expended energy to push the mower. In order to maintain a set weight, you need to consume more calories when you exercise more. More calories = more food = more food production = more CO2. Everything has a cost.
04.10.2025 17:42 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0It’s already looking like the most popular Christmas gift this year is going to be Gestapo Barbie. As a bonus, she comes in a set with two Brownshirt Kens.
04.10.2025 16:13 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 02/2 …of the natural cycle of warming and cooling that happens on every time scale throughout his history. It’s caused by two things, 1) changes in solar radiation that occur cyclically, and 2) changes in orbital cycles known as Milankovitch Cycles.
Follow me for more Easy Lessons In Science.
1/2 This is called “global warming” or more recently “climate change”. The Earth has been warming for about 150 years since a period called the “Little Ice Age. During that period, the Earth was colder than it has been in 10,000 years. Don’t worry, though, this is all part…
04.10.2025 15:58 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0That seems to be a normal trend.
25.07.2025 09:39 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Are there just 20 years shown here?? Can you provide a link?
25.07.2025 09:28 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Sunday on the porch at Terlingua mercantile, Terlingua, TX USA
18.06.2025 16:32 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0You crossed a line. Not funny. Fuck you. Blocking you.
19.05.2025 19:03 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 6 📌 0Zeke’s study is completely wrong for Tambora. The cooling had occurred before the eruption due to the Dalton Minimum. The yellow is TSI (NNLTSI1). Here’s a graphic…
11.05.2025 22:38 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Oops…never mind.
05.04.2025 09:02 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0What was normal about 1991-2020? Serious question.
05.04.2025 08:59 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0🧵5/ …Maunder Minimum, about 1700 AD, temperature jumped and continued to rise. CO2 didn’t start increasing for 75 years.
Please look at the facts and not the hype.
🧵4/ …the paleoclimate record…EXCEPT FOR THE LAST 156 YEARS…temperature change has always preceded changes in CO2 😳. And even worse, they don’t even get the last 156 year part right. At the end of the…
27.02.2025 13:27 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0🧵3/ …nat/ut and −0.054 ± 0.040 nat/ut in the reverse direction. Therefore we have on these long time scales a significant IF only from the temperature data to the CO2, but not in the other direction, exactly opposite to that seen in the data from the last 156 years.
They’re saying that for all of…
🧵/2 …of 1000 years using the AICC201243,44 chronology. As already known the two data set are highly correlated with a correlation coefficient of 0.842 ± 0. By calculating the IF in nat per unit time from the 1000 year interpolated PAT time series to CO2 concentration we get 0.123 ± 0.060…
27.02.2025 13:17 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0🧵/1 This paper is embarrassingly stupid. Did you get to this part?…
“Further we apply this technique to analyse paleoclimatological air temperature (PAT)40 and CO2/CH4 data from the EPICA Dome C ice cores41,42 from the last 800,000 years. Both time series are interpolated on the same time steps…
🧵/2 …changes occur. And, on timescales where correlation between temperature and CO2 is observed, temperature always leads CO2. Always. In light of these facts, why would we spend billions to capture CO2 when we can predict with certainty that it won’t have any impact on temperature.
21.02.2025 20:49 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0🧵/1 It is easily demonstrated that throughout climate history, there has never been a causal link between atmospheric CO2 concentration and temperature. There are long periods when CO2 remains virtually unchanged while significant temperature…
21.02.2025 20:48 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Looks like we’re in the clear, kids. Global surface temperature is back where it was 9 years ago.
climatereanalyzer.org/clim/t2_dail...
We need Bullwinkle now more than ever (and Rocky of course, that goes without saying).
19.02.2025 13:51 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I wonder if it could be nudged into hitting a particular city? Just curious.
19.02.2025 13:40 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0You’ve got to love the irony here…”Large Areas of Fertile Cropland Rendered Useless by Underground CO2 Storage”.
That’s enough for me. I vote we kill carbon capture in the crib.