Izzy, short for Isabella

The bar is so low that I'm just happy that someone won who is capable of disappointing people

Once more, for old times’ sake

mamdani did vote for her tho

You expect too much from him.

"Democrats Deeply Worried About the Repercussions of Victory" could be the defining statement of our generation.

Oh yeah then Sliwa would also be on there twice. Cause he's Republican and Protect Animals.

oh come on

Most of this makes sense. But what does he mean by on the ballot twice? That sounds like it would split the vote

wife so aloof she makes you mayor

Seems like a waste of time to argue whether Cuomo did good things in the past. He's a sex pest endorsed by Donald Trump whose campaign has been nonstop racism, I feel comfortable giving 2019 Cuomo all the credit in the book cuz it should have no bearing on this race.

Eh, seems thin skinned. I don't think the average user actually uses these lists, and any somewhat big account will be on some number of lists.

He's already here all the time though:(

Actual supervillain Mr. Soon-Shiong swooping in to save the day.

*fit the campaigning

And then you end up with Starmer Labour who got a shitton of votes and then governed like every tory they replaced was telling them what to do simultaneously. So many seats and a complete lack of ideological goals.

"does moderation impact policy outcomes?" is a question popularist pundits can't answer consistently because they have a big tent of "yes, to the left," "yes, to the right but it's worth it", "no", and "I don't care".

Plus it doesn't really affect most people whether trans women play sports so that gets seen as a minor detail that makes them go "eh let's do what's currently popular", meanwhile the people with strongly held positions are like "why are we doing the GOP's work for them?"

I think the crux of these brick wall discussions is that centrists just don't want to **feel** uncomfortable, but just enough of a small number of them actually want transphobic policies that they can't come out and say "fit the complaining to the electorate regardless of policy".

How exactly do centrists suggest the Democrats lecture trans people out of wanting rights?

If Cuomo wins, then the Democratic Party loses, which is a disaster for internal morale, messaging, and opening the tent.

We can agree those guys suck at least

Did Rahm Emmanuel write that website?

Comment 1 is moronic, comment 2 is based on contempt for voters, comment 3 makes an interesting point since "just run the same candidate again" worked in 2024, but greatly overestimates Harris' ability to win over voters.

That the screenshot of things Rahm Emmanuel didn't say, is of Rahm Emmanuel

Deciding To Win – Toward A Common Sense Renewal of the Democratic Party Deciding to Win aims to provide the most comprehensive account to date of why Democrats lost and what our party needs to do to win again.

decidingtowin.org

The way this is a blatant lie that you just chose to believe

eh, the lady whose actions prompted you to ask it deffo fanned the flames

There are anti-idpol leftists but the fact that some people hoping to influence the mainstream Democratic party are joining in on that is bad.

On the contrary, they won't care about it in 2 or 4 years, but in 3 years it will mean everything

She definitely gets to land a lot of final blows, but she is ultimately a tragic character and the central philosophical conflict of the game ends up lying on mostly gendered lines.

Hilarious, and as I've found, looks even worse than just leaving up the original article, which while more edge than point didn't actually call anyone that.