Doc Savage's Avatar

Doc Savage

@savage-t.bsky.social

Adventurer

292 Followers  |  384 Following  |  1,223 Posts  |  Joined: 25.10.2024  |  2.237

Latest posts by savage-t.bsky.social on Bluesky

John Martyn - May You Never
YouTube video by scotsraindog John Martyn - May You Never

Just lovely.

13.02.2026 22:10 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Yes, we know what you believe. The question was, do you have any evidence to substantiate these beliefs?

13.02.2026 19:34 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

If we've got compromised pedophiles who've infiltrated every echelon of government and industry, then I think perhaps the national security crisis is already upon us?

12.02.2026 21:59 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Apparently, you don't even need to invent it first to announce it as a feature.

12.02.2026 20:57 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

"Enhance."

11.02.2026 07:29 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I fear we've veered into "Those browns are doing something I don't like" phase.

Next up: "Those browns have something I want."

11.02.2026 03:58 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I think it's time to rename the files after the person who is named the most in them.

10.02.2026 23:56 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Sounds like he delivered a load of 'nannies'.

10.02.2026 23:00 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

'The King of Debt' kind of takes on new meaning...

10.02.2026 16:19 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

"Oh, well. If you brought your kids there, that makes everything perfectly alright, then."

10.02.2026 16:15 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

THEY'RE EATING THE PUCKS!

10.02.2026 14:33 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

"Err... I mean, welcome them to their expansive views from their luxurious condominium at Regolith Ranch, assuming they can qualify for our in-house financing, of course."

10.02.2026 08:29 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

"And another thing... this one time, *before* high-school..."

10.02.2026 05:34 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Can we make it go slower? Much, much slower.

10.02.2026 00:53 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Not if I get to pit them against each other, it's not.

10.02.2026 00:52 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Their Texas gerrymandering might even blow up in their face, if they've diluted their 'safe' districts enough for a complete and total rout when faced with a wave of backlash across all districts.

10.02.2026 00:39 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

"I'm just saying, they hate hockey!"

09.02.2026 23:15 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

My dream: "Oh, yeah. Sorry, bro. No, you don't get to keep any of it. That's taxpayer's money. No, see, you were just the servant. Thanks for playing our hand, but your turn is over now. Hope you saved enough of your own money for your legal defense, because some of these stacks smell kinda fishy!"

09.02.2026 07:56 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

A possible stopgap measure would require enumerating the specific crimes for which the pardon is valid. This eliminates blanket pardons for "any crimes during x time period", but more importantly, it intrinsically links the issuer to the crime, and forces the consideration of political consequences.

09.02.2026 07:18 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

"Hey, a little privacy? And I better not see that on the internet!"

09.02.2026 03:47 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Never met a contest he wouldn't try to cheat.

09.02.2026 02:08 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I say we slap some skis on Trump before deciding who's a loser.

08.02.2026 23:50 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

...is best sun.

08.02.2026 06:44 β€” πŸ‘ 9    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

What's with the carpal tunnel there, Skeeter? Been busy, have you?

07.02.2026 22:52 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

"Yeah? Well I paid less for mine than you did, so there!"

07.02.2026 22:49 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I think that fits the legal definition of obstruction, for the both of them.

07.02.2026 21:04 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

To quote your shipmate, "Oh, my."

Even the rudimentary AI of yesteryear could have a field day with all of those delightful poses.

07.02.2026 09:54 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image 07.02.2026 09:40 β€” πŸ‘ 13    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

"Did I say 'limited interactions'? I meant Ltd. interactions."

07.02.2026 05:55 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

The Inglorious Basterds had an elegant solution to his dilemma.

07.02.2026 01:00 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

@savage-t is following 20 prominent accounts