Peter Geoghegan's Avatar

Peter Geoghegan

@petergeoghegan.bsky.social

Irishman in London.

59,840 Followers  |  1,585 Following  |  1,764 Posts  |  Joined: 22.06.2023  |  2.3184

Latest posts by petergeoghegan.bsky.social on Bluesky

Haha not that long, alas!

07.08.2025 11:28 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 2    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Out of office on. See you all in a few weeks!

07.08.2025 11:19 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 56    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 1
The Cabinet Office v The Information Commissioner & Anor - Find Case Law - The National Archives

The case was actually heard in January so it spans both Tory and Labour administrations caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ukftt/grc/20...

07.08.2025 08:53 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
The Cabinet Office v The Information Commissioner & Anor - Find Case Law - The National Archives

The case was actually heard in January so it spans both Tory and Labour administrations caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ukftt/grc/20...

07.08.2025 08:53 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 4    ๐Ÿ” 1    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
The Cabinet Office v The Information Commissioner & Anor - Find Case Law - The National Archives

The case was actually heard in January so it spans both Tory and Labour administrations caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ukftt/grc/20...

07.08.2025 08:53 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Preview
Ministers tried to block publication of financial interests form The Cabinet Office spent ยฃ30,000 on a legal battle to prevent publication of a questionnaire for ministers.

Also think itโ€™s very telling that there is no source for the figure in their story www.bbc.co.uk/news/article...

The full FOI is on democracy for sale

07.08.2025 08:06 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 9    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

In this case I shared it as the story directly related to the reporter - who filed the foi - and the bbc as it took the case.

I would see this as pretty standard decent journalism (and decent behaviour full stop.)

Nothing was agreed but I really didnโ€™t expect them to just publish it

07.08.2025 08:06 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 11    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 3    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Preview
Ministers tried to block publication of financial interests form The Cabinet Office spent ยฃ30,000 on a legal battle to prevent publication of a questionnaire for ministers.

Indeed! Worth reading the bbc story. Thereโ€™s no source cited for the ยฃ32k figure www.bbc.co.uk/news/article...

The full foi is on democracy for sale

07.08.2025 08:04 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 15    ๐Ÿ” 3    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

*Extremely* poor behaviour from the BBC and its reporter here.

07.08.2025 07:47 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 153    ๐Ÿ” 37    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 3    ๐Ÿ“Œ 3
Preview
Ministers tried to block publication of financial interests form The Cabinet Office spent ยฃ30,000 on a legal battle to prevent publication of a questionnaire for ministers.

I know, right!?! Worth reading the BBC piece and noting that there's no source quoted for the 'more than ยฃ30,000 figure' www.bbc.co.uk/news/article...

(The full FOI is published on our site)

07.08.2025 07:42 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 40    ๐Ÿ” 4    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 3    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Preview
Subscribe to Democracy for Sale A newsletter dedicated to revealing how dark money and hidden influence threaten our democracy. Click to read Democracy for Sale, a Substack publication with tens of thousands of subscribers.

We all pay our licence fee, no quarrel. But if you think our efforts deserve some credit - and a few extra bob - please become a paid subscriber to Democracy for Sale.

And if you can't avoid that, do subscribe to the newsletter.

democracyforsale.substack.com/subscribe

07.08.2025 07:30 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 92    ๐Ÿ” 11    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 2    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image

PS: You may have read this story already. The BBC ran a version of it yesterday

We shared our FOI docs with their reporter and press office.
Their response? To publish the story - our story - without even notifying us.

A ยฃ6bn public broadcaster selling out a tiny investigative newsletter. Nice. ๐Ÿ˜”

07.08.2025 07:30 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 468    ๐Ÿ” 179    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 25    ๐Ÿ“Œ 16

Lawyer @danneidle.bsky.social who first exposed Zahawiโ€™s tax affairs:

โ€œThere seems to be zero legal basis for refusing this FOI. A huge amount of taxpayer money has been wasted because of an obsession with secrecy.โ€

In all weโ€™ve found ยฃ1m spent by govt on legal fees to fight FOI cases

07.08.2025 07:30 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 96    ๐Ÿ” 12    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 2    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

A judge said the government had โ€œoverstatedโ€ the risks and there was โ€œstrong public interestโ€ in understanding how these declarations work.

As @suehawley.bsky.social says โ€œโ€œIt is extremely difficult to fathom why the government should want to be so secretive over basic things."

07.08.2025 07:30 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 81    ๐Ÿ” 7    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

BBC - rightly - appealed to information commissioner.

Who told Cabinet Office - rightly - to release the *blank form*

Cabinet Office still refused. So they ended up at an information tribunal

Government spent ยฃ32,251 on legal fees to stop the release of a document withโ€ฆ nothing on it.

07.08.2025 07:30 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 89    ๐Ÿ” 12    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

After Nadhim Zahawi was sacked for failing to declare a tax investigation, a BBC reporter asked to see the blank ministerial form he should have filled in.

Not his answers. Just the empty form.

The Cabinet Office refused sayings disclosure could harm โ€œthe effective conduct of public affairs." ๐Ÿคฏ

07.08.2025 07:30 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 83    ๐Ÿ” 14    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 2    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Preview
The blank piece of paper that cost taxpayers ยฃ32,000 Government โ€˜obsession with secrecyโ€™ descends into farce

๐Ÿšจ New: The UK government spent ยฃ32,251 fighting to hide a blank form.

Yep - 30 grand plus to avoid releasing a blank template of the ministerial interests form.

A wild story - with a surprise twist. Would read to end of this one... ๐Ÿ™„ (๐Ÿงต)

democracyforsale.substack.com/p/why-did-ta...

07.08.2025 07:30 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 435    ๐Ÿ” 233    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 19    ๐Ÿ“Œ 20
'The BBC Bottled It' - Alan Rusbridger on Political Influence Over The Media
YouTube video by Democracy for Sale 'The BBC Bottled It' - Alan Rusbridger on Political Influence Over The Media

Really enjoyed this conversation with the peerless @arusbridger.bsky.social on Democracy for Sale.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=b2RH...

06.08.2025 20:57 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 75    ๐Ÿ” 33    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 1

This is going to be a really, really good discussion on Freedom of Information - get along if you can!

06.08.2025 12:13 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 21    ๐Ÿ” 5    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Ah yeah I didnโ€™t mean that theyโ€™d torn through the top order. Was a fair result, and very dramatic

04.08.2025 16:50 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

India thoroughly deserves this. Came out this morning and absolutely tore through England.

04.08.2025 10:38 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 42    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 5    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Incredibly equally matched. A draw would be a fair result butโ€ฆ.

03.08.2025 14:55 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 2    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

What a gloriously fitting finale to the end of Eng v India. Been a terrific test

03.08.2025 14:08 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 51    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 4    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Preview
Revealed: How foreign billionaires pump millions into British politics The Elon Musk-shaped hole in Starmerโ€™s Election Bill

๐Ÿ”ด NEW: Foreign billionaires are using UK companies to pour millions into British politics โ€” legally.

We found ยฃ6m+ in political donations from UK firms owned by foreign nationals โ€” people who canโ€™t vote in Britain.

New on Democracy for Sale (๐Ÿงต)

democracyforsale.substack.com/p/revealed-h...

02.08.2025 10:08 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 466    ๐Ÿ” 336    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 13    ๐Ÿ“Œ 10

Yes this is it exactly.

02.08.2025 14:44 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 2    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Yep, mention this in the piece. But these arenโ€™t shell companies, theyโ€™re trading companies. So currently looks like wouldnโ€™t be covered by the proposals (but of course that might change depending on what exactly proposed legislation looks like)

02.08.2025 13:35 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Preview
Labour's election funding reforms: closing loopholes at one door, welcoming foreign influence at another Welcome

Yes and Mark wrote an excellent piece on this very issue recently lordseyeview.substack.com/p/labours-el...

02.08.2025 11:48 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 1    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Thanks for sharing the piece!

02.08.2025 10:39 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Thanks - as it says in the piece, it is โ€˜unlikelyโ€™ that these people can vote (and hence donate) but we have taken a very conservative approach, and asked the various people directly if they were registered to vote in the UK or U.K. passport holders.

02.08.2025 10:28 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 2    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Preview
Revealed: How foreign billionaires pump millions into British politics The Elon Musk-shaped hole in Starmerโ€™s Election Bill

Read the full story from @lucasamin.bsky.social and me on how foreign billionaires are using UK companies to bankroll British politics in Democracy for Sale today.

If you want to help us keep digging, subscribe, too ๐Ÿ˜€ democracyforsale.substack.com/p/revealed-h...

02.08.2025 10:08 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 22    ๐Ÿ” 14    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

@petergeoghegan is following 20 prominent accounts