Glad there can be no 1A claim for ‘’I hereby search you in retaliation for your protected speech, thereby dispelling any causal complexities!’’ That seems right.
05.12.2025 23:40 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0@danielrice.bsky.social
Law prof @ UNC-Chapel Hill. Con Law and Indian Law. Views my own. Bio: https://law.unc.edu/people/daniel-rice/ SSRN: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=1684746
Glad there can be no 1A claim for ‘’I hereby search you in retaliation for your protected speech, thereby dispelling any causal complexities!’’ That seems right.
05.12.2025 23:40 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Missed this when it was originally uploaded, but "Conscription's Constitution" by Gerard Magliocca looks fascinating:
papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
I had such a terrific time presenting at Georgia State yesterday – thanks for having me!!
02.12.2025 19:46 — 👍 14 🔁 1 💬 1 📌 0TIL that France continued to use the guillotine until 1977?!?!
www.nytimes.com/2025/10/10/a...
It’s super cool seeing Learned Hand’s actual TV and Peleton in these pics.
29.11.2025 23:50 — 👍 10 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Aspiring law profs – check out this fantastic opportunity!
21.11.2025 14:26 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Sounds violent!
18.11.2025 01:22 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0program for the First Amendment Law Review's annual symposium
Looking forward to attending the First Amendment Law Review's 2025 Symposium tomorrow (and moderating a panel on Mahmoud v. Taylor)!
medialaw.unc.edu/events/first...
Cannabis Amnesty Box
Amazing
08.11.2025 20:13 — 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0www.nytimes.com/2025/11/07/u...
08.11.2025 13:23 — 👍 7 🔁 2 💬 0 📌 0If you're the listening type, an interview version is here (or wherever you get your podcasts):
soundcloud.com/california-l...
Civic duties aren't static artifacts; they've been created, altered, and destroyed in response to cultural pressures. Because individual liberty and social obligation are dialectically linked, it doesn't make sense to decide liberty claims in a purely time-bound way. (Cough, Dobbs.)
04.11.2025 14:04 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0The article explores the (mostly) forgotten concept of duties owed to the state. For decades, judges would just say that certain legal compulsions rested on societal obligations, thereby negating associated liberty claims. And plenty of modern laws still function as a form of conscription.
04.11.2025 14:04 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Abstract for "Civic Duties and Cultural Change"
Abstract & Table of Contents for "Civic Duties and Cultural Change"
The final version of "Civic Duties and Cultural Change" is now live on @califlrev.bsky.social's website!
californialawreview.org/s/4-Rice.pdf
Unless I'm missing something, this seems pretty straightforwardly unconstitutional.
30.10.2025 02:19 — 👍 336 🔁 105 💬 9 📌 3Thread
22.10.2025 17:11 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0this is a tacit admission that the administration is not confident in the legal arguments it would have to make in order to detain them, which should also cast into question the legality of the operation in the first place
18.10.2025 20:17 — 👍 2355 🔁 684 💬 41 📌 10When your toddler watches Mr. Rogers for the first time and immediately says, ‘’it’s an ad!’’
18.10.2025 10:33 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Very glad to see that former SG Prelogar and her team are handling this one. Nothing other than summary reversal is warranted here, but I’d settle for a cert grant.
17.10.2025 10:25 — 👍 3 🔁 2 💬 0 📌 0extra comma in the Dobbs majority opinion
This is not the most important part about Dobbs, but there’s (still) a typo on p. 6:
17.10.2025 01:06 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I am confident that, in performing this limited historical analysis, the Court will not analogize to the holdings of prior cases. Nor will it derive from those cases principles that seemingly encompass the present SDP claim.
14.10.2025 14:09 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0If the Court eventually grants cert here, I look forward to its "careful analysis" of the relevant history. Was there, in fact, a positive-law right to obtain information from the government about the gender-identity choices of one's children?
14.10.2025 14:09 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0you had anything left to learn about the mind of the South?
10.10.2025 16:06 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Here's to hoping the federal posse comitatus power stays buried...
07.10.2025 00:04 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0The sequence appears to be: (1) "All flag burners should be incarcerated"; (2) EO prioritizing the prosecution of flag burners who cause noncommunicative harms (because doctrine); and (3) "No, I'm actually demanding that literally everyone who burns a flag be imprisoned."
04.10.2025 00:54 — 👍 2 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0new frontiers in compelled speech
03.10.2025 14:53 — 👍 6 🔁 5 💬 0 📌 1A series of short posts from leading scholars about the constraints the First Amendment imposes on the government's authority to impose conditions on federal funding. Seems relevant! This is a @knightcolumbia.org series from earlier this year. knightcolumbia.org/research/fed...
02.10.2025 16:21 — 👍 49 🔁 33 💬 2 📌 0Nice.
28.09.2025 00:02 — 👍 5 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Toddler’s first no-nap day. Help.
27.09.2025 19:15 — 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0