Daniel Rice's Avatar

Daniel Rice

@danielrice.bsky.social

Law prof @ UNC-Chapel Hill. Con Law and Indian Law. Views my own. Bio: https://law.unc.edu/people/daniel-rice/ SSRN: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=1684746

3,326 Followers  |  753 Following  |  200 Posts  |  Joined: 01.07.2023  |  1.5652

Latest posts by danielrice.bsky.social on Bluesky

Can I also vote to grant you tenure? (congrats!!)

09.02.2026 22:28 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Eagerly awaiting the response, "Bruen's Tenth Amendment Problem's Problem."

09.02.2026 19:17 β€” πŸ‘ 6    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

Great piece! As a prelude to the main argument, it does a nice job of rebutting sympathetic reconstructions of Bruen. Give it a read!

09.02.2026 17:11 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

My latest, "Free Exercise and the Redistribution of Liberty," is now posted (and forthcoming in @yalelawjournal.bsky.social). It argues that free exercise doctrine uses selective market logic to redistribute both public resources and liberty itself.

Comments welcome: papers.ssrn.com/abstract=618...

09.02.2026 15:22 β€” πŸ‘ 88    πŸ” 19    πŸ’¬ 14    πŸ“Œ 2

Had a ton of fun on this panel with @audrelawdamercy.bsky.social, Thomas Saenz, and Reggie Oh!

07.02.2026 00:24 β€” πŸ‘ 13    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
A student criticizes my attempt to pretext-proof my tenure file

A student criticizes my attempt to pretext-proof my tenure file

Usually don’t screenshot student evals, but making an exception here

06.02.2026 00:26 β€” πŸ‘ 11    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

See you there!

04.02.2026 19:38 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I made a point of assigning Muller this semester!

03.02.2026 11:18 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 1
Preview
Zachary Clopton named dean of Northwestern Pritzker School of Law He has served the school as interim dean for the past six months

More article placements for everyone else! news.northwestern.edu/stories/2026...

29.01.2026 19:48 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Happy to announce that my article, "The Jurisprudence of Constitutional Entitlement," has finally hit the press via the William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal.

It explores how judges create certain domains where govt is *entitled* to act, even if it means flouting general doctrinal rules.

27.01.2026 18:30 β€” πŸ‘ 13    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Video thumbnail

brass solidarity band performing β€œstand by me” in the streets of whittier next to alex pretti’s memorial. the crowd started chanting β€œthe people united will never be defeated” so they incorporated it into the song. i love minneapolis

27.01.2026 00:22 β€” πŸ‘ 23437    πŸ” 7823    πŸ’¬ 331    πŸ“Œ 890
Post image

I feel like this warranted a push notification

26.01.2026 11:18 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

There went your shot at becoming a law dean.

24.01.2026 01:45 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Quite possibly, if a doctrine expressly seeks to implement historical "understandings" or "beliefs"! But admittedly haven't thought about this.

20.01.2026 16:12 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Reposting for the workweek crowd!

20.01.2026 15:56 β€” πŸ‘ 6    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Tradition Without Text? <p><span>It is no secret that the <i>Dobbs </i>framework dooms virtually all liberty claims brought under the ambit of due process. Yet for all their devotion t

I've just posted a draft essay called "Tradition Without Text?" (forthcoming in Duke Law Journal Online). It critiques Dobbs for using crude positive-law proxies to identify "historical understandings of ordered liberty."

papers.ssrn.com/abstract=609...

19.01.2026 13:09 β€” πŸ‘ 12    πŸ” 5    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 3
β€˜β€™political free zone’’

β€˜β€™political free zone’’

Minnesota Voters Alliance v. Mansky in the wild!

17.01.2026 17:20 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

This footnote from Foley v. Connelie (1978) should be more widely known:

15.01.2026 20:48 β€” πŸ‘ 35    πŸ” 10    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Yes, both apps allow you to β€˜β€™clone’’ your voice by speaking a few pre-written sentences!

15.01.2026 12:46 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Speechify, Natural Reader, and probably others. Super fun!

15.01.2026 02:24 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

You have been known to discharge a composition!

13.01.2026 23:11 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Book recommendation: "The Worst Trickster Story Ever Told" by Keith Richotte, Jr.

This is a wonderful and *highly* entertaining account of the development of Indian law.

I learned a lot!!!

#indianlaw #law #constitution @skystorians @lawsky

12.01.2026 17:17 β€” πŸ‘ 16    πŸ” 7    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Gonna add this to my syllabus on Johnson v. M’Intosh day …

09.01.2026 22:28 β€” πŸ‘ 54    πŸ” 5    πŸ’¬ 4    πŸ“Œ 1
Preview
Opinion | It’s 2086. This Is What American History Could Look Like. (Published 2022)

Didn't quite take 65 years! www.nytimes.com/2022/01/06/o...

06.01.2026 20:40 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

oh my lord

06.01.2026 01:35 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Thanks to @williambaude.bsky.social for flagging Pryor's essay, which is worth a read. (But so are the arguments of his critics!)

06.01.2026 00:25 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Justice Scalia engages in judicial moral prophecy

Justice Scalia engages in judicial moral prophecy

Judge Wilkinson engages in judicial moral prophecy

Judge Wilkinson engages in judicial moral prophecy

Justice John Marshal Harlan engages in engages in judicial moral prophecy

Justice John Marshal Harlan engages in engages in judicial moral prophecy

Anyone who seriously engages with this scholarship can't reduce moral prophecy to liberal wishcasting. Trying to avoid future tragediesβ€”avowedly on rule-of-law groundsβ€”isn't "hyperventilat[ion]." (It was good enough for Justice Scalia, Judge Wilkinson, and the first Justice Harlan!)

06.01.2026 00:25 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
"Things to Read This Week (1/5/2026)," from the Divided Argument Blog

"Things to Read This Week (1/5/2026)," from the Divided Argument Blog

Wherein a prominent federal judge urges courts not to anticipate future moral judgments, but fails even to acknowledge the only full-length defense of that practice (my "Judicial Moral Prophecy" piece, available here: wustllawreview.org/2023/09/25/j...)

06.01.2026 00:25 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

This is basically the teacher’s manual

28.12.2025 15:25 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

His vids are a RABBIT HOLE. Wow.

17.12.2025 16:26 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

@danielrice is following 20 prominent accounts