𝕋𝕙𝕖 ℍ𝕚𝕤𝕥𝕠𝕣𝕪 𝕠𝕗 ℂ𝕙𝕚𝕟𝕒 ℙ𝕠𝕕𝕔𝕒𝕤𝕥

he wants to flash people his spectral junk. he gets off on it.

Memento potty, O Caesar: remember that you, too, must wipe...

《𝚀𝚄𝙴𝚁𝚈 𝚁𝙴𝚂𝙿𝙾𝙽𝚂𝙴: 𝚆𝙴 𝚂𝙴𝙴𝙺 𝚃𝙾 𝙵𝚄𝚁𝚃𝙷𝙴𝚁 𝙿𝙴𝚁𝙵𝙴𝙲𝚃 𝙰𝙻𝙻 𝙰𝚂𝙿𝙴𝙲𝚃𝚂 𝙾𝙵 𝙾𝚄𝚁 𝙱𝙴𝙸𝙽𝙶, 𝙸𝙽𝙲𝙻𝚄𝙳𝙸𝙽𝙶 𝚃𝙷𝙴 𝙰𝚂𝚂𝙸𝙼𝙸𝙻𝙰𝚃𝙸𝙾𝙽 𝙾𝙵 𝟾-𝙿𝙰𝙲𝙺𝚂 & 𝚃𝙰𝙲𝚃𝙻𝙴𝙽𝙴𝙲𝙺 𝚂𝚆𝙴𝙰𝚃𝙴𝚁𝚂. 𝚆𝙴 𝙰𝚁𝙴 𝚃𝙷𝙴 𝙱𝙾𝚁𝙶.》

100% agree

You're doing great, kiddo. If you keep posting through it at this rate, you'll win em all over to your side soon... you almost there!

Hubert Louis & the Tickertapes

That is the dictionary definition of "not taking no for an answer."

Top-shelf vintage brand-name Poster's Madness™.

If you've ever wondered what it would be like to try to communicate with someone who seems to have been raised by AI like Romulus, Remus & the Wolf-Mother, & only ever conversed with LLMs before... have his 1st-ever human interface...

It's 2 days old, still ongoing, & an absolutely wild ride:

He's doing swell, everyone. Everything is fine :)

bsky.app/profile/sher...

hey, um, maybe let's not send her on a redeption arc to make her more palatable. yeah, no, we're all good here, actually.

Pouring one out for the homies (dropping an excedrin under the fridge)

^ Yupppp

Even the CCP's Politburo Standing Committee would blush at the thought of being seen to be this overtly self-serving & nakedly corrupt in its vested interests in state-affiliated orgs...

This is definitely the least rock'n'roll photo ever taken.

Conservative theory of jurisprudence used to be about "precedence," "continuity," & even "intent."
Now it centers entirely around the single overwhelming imperative of "owning the libs & drinking their tears."

If you carefully scan the full document, you may be ale to subtly pick out the hidden essence of the amendment's statement of intent...

it's pretty well-hidden, so I've tried to point it out for everyone...

With absolutely zero respect to this slithering imbecile, this facile attempt at a counter-"argument" flies in the face 150+ years of US jurisprudence & all reasonable, rational readings of of both the letter & spirit of the law.
Wurman should be ashamed of himself, though he's obviously incapable.

Today in the people who've been professionally doing this for 45 years going, "Oh wow, style & format is actually also important to effective communication? TIL standing flat in front of a camera reading canned lines approved by committee doesn't resonate..."

For clarification: that last post was saying you're a silly, lying git who seems to get off on purposely wasting everyone's time through transparent, childish verbal "tricks" that sound... like they came from an LLM you're feeding for responses.

Still desperately trying to talk strangers into a weird vidchat...

Ah yes, our ancient, implacable foe - Eastasia.

It’s been reading to me like an incredibly unsocialized guy who talks to no one but chatbot personality simulations believing that he’s having actual conversations with conscious agents & seems to believe that the argument methods he uses with bots also works on real people.

“You’re just intoxicated with hate”

bsky.app/profile/sher...

“Intoxicated with hate”??

Really dude? This is your big swing? Something that sounds like plagiarist remix of a Trump slogan?

Which AI do you use to write these *devastating* ripostes for you?

Hey, bit of free advice, friendo: just for kicks, next time try digging up, instead.

“Accuse *Me* of shoplifting?! I brought receipts!!”

<produces receipt that clearly doesn’t list the 4K TV in my cart & is from another store>

That’s a fluffyboi

Holmes, if you’re going to dedicate yourself to something like being a gaslighting liar, you should at least be minimally competent in constructing a believable lie & maintaining it convincingly.

Instead, your immediate fallback is middle-school snark & butthurt “no u” ad hominem.

Amateur hour.

That is the most list of online usernames that, uh... yeah... wow.