so, I just randomly came upon Curtis Sliwa standing on a corner giving a speech to four people (& a camera). obviously i stopped to listen and nod along encouragingly.
(dudeโs not going anywhere. we got this)
@roytsao.bsky.social
Teaching political theory/philosophy etc at Pratt Institute, Brooklyn; Shax & co. at BC/CUNY. bird stalker. tweet tweet. ๐ณ๏ธโ๐
so, I just randomly came upon Curtis Sliwa standing on a corner giving a speech to four people (& a camera). obviously i stopped to listen and nod along encouragingly.
(dudeโs not going anywhere. we got this)
God bless you both
23.09.2025 00:06 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0kakania! love it
20.09.2025 23:46 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0and pretty much always have been
20.09.2025 23:27 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0logging off now. maybe also throwing my phone into the ocean, whoโs to say
12.09.2025 19:24 โ ๐ 9 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 1I come back to the question with which I began: who are *we*, in this impasse, and what are we responsible for, in the circumstances? The present U.S. government isn't *us*, and it isn't ours. We can no more rely on the inertial force of decades-old statutes than we can count on past presidents' executive actions. Our endorsement of the government's policies isn't sought, and it's idle to remonstrate. If the ethical duties that weigh in Odenbaugh's analysis have any practical hold on us at all, they converge on a different set of practical questions. How are we to overcome the impotence to which we've been reduced? What will it take to build and to mobilize the power to displace our opponents? I don't claim to know how that might be done, or if it's even possible. But it seems pretty clear that it would be unrealistic to hope for any good whatever to come of political action confined to the scope of what had seemed feasible, in previous years. And if that's true of our situation now, I can't help but wonder if this might have been true all along.
last lines from a thing I wrote back in April, just published in Ethics, Policy & Environment. Nominally in response to a paper (from last year) on wildlife conservation ethics, but mostly channeling my rage at *all this*
โWhat is to be Done?โ
www.tandfonline.com/eprint/GVXJW...
thanks- bleak, yes.
planning on writing something further on thisโ
working title: โOwls at Dusk: Reflections on Damaged Natureโ
i trust you get the idea
hey look I wrote a thing that just got published
09.09.2025 22:45 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0truth
09.09.2025 22:44 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0sounds great! wish I could be there (wonโt be at APSA this year alas)
09.09.2025 22:43 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Let me know what you think- I may be writing further on this
09.09.2025 22:40 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0title for an era
09.09.2025 19:25 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0nice find!
09.09.2025 17:27 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0let me know what you think if you get a chance to read. not sure how well it works as a freestanding piece, as I had too much to say about paper I was responding to. As youโll see I donโt have much patience for the framing.
09.09.2025 17:19 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0fyi @michaeldemoor.bsky.social - itโs about the PNW barred owls
09.09.2025 16:58 โ ๐ 3 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 2 ๐ 0I come back to the question with which I began: who are *we*, in this impasse, and what are we responsible for, in the circumstances? The present U.S. government isn't *us*, and it isn't ours. We can no more rely on the inertial force of decades-old statutes than we can count on past presidents' executive actions. Our endorsement of the government's policies isn't sought, and it's idle to remonstrate. If the ethical duties that weigh in Odenbaugh's analysis have any practical hold on us at all, they converge on a different set of practical questions. How are we to overcome the impotence to which we've been reduced? What will it take to build and to mobilize the power to displace our opponents? I don't claim to know how that might be done, or if it's even possible. But it seems pretty clear that it would be unrealistic to hope for any good whatever to come of political action confined to the scope of what had seemed feasible, in previous years. And if that's true of our situation now, I can't help but wonder if this might have been true all along.
last lines from a thing I wrote back in April, just published in Ethics, Policy & Environment. Nominally in response to a paper (from last year) on wildlife conservation ethics, but mostly channeling my rage at *all this*
โWhat is to be Done?โ
www.tandfonline.com/eprint/GVXJW...
โit goes against our presidentโs laws.โ what a country this is
09.09.2025 16:14 โ ๐ 4 ๐ 1 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0The big authoritarian creepiness of this is the students absolute certainty it is illegal for the professor to teach gender theory because the president said so
09.09.2025 13:35 โ ๐ 13 ๐ 2 ๐ฌ 2 ๐ 0Gotham Commune gotta love it
09.09.2025 16:18 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0wow looks great- congrats
09.09.2025 16:17 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0โit goes against our presidentโs laws.โ what a country this is
09.09.2025 16:14 โ ๐ 4 ๐ 1 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0I think about this every day
01.09.2025 21:24 โ ๐ 4 ๐ 1 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Just a reminder that if the sovereign can't keep your life from being nasty, brutal, and short, the deal is off.
29.08.2025 00:17 โ ๐ 26 ๐ 8 ๐ฌ 3 ๐ 0yeah. like, it really is all happening, now, real time.
29.08.2025 02:10 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0checks out
27.08.2025 16:14 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0outstanding. even by the standards of MTโs unfailing excellence. *sly*
27.08.2025 16:08 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0yeah, i hear you, of course. couldnโt resist doing my classroom bit
27.08.2025 16:00 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0cars are allowed only on roads tho. motor vehicle regulations are pretty strict about, say, not being allowed to drive on the college quad lawn even though some might find that a much faster way to get to classes. just saying
27.08.2025 15:34 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0came here to say that!
27.08.2025 15:22 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0paging @zsw.bsky.social @calebcrain.bsky.social @michaeldemoor.bsky.social @coatesmatthew.bsky.social
21.08.2025 21:50 โ ๐ 3 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0